1 | The calculated run-up height and resulting inundation ashore is controlled by |
---|
2 | the input topographic and bathymetric elevation, the |
---|
3 | initial and boundary conditions, as well as the cell area of the computational |
---|
4 | mesh. |
---|
5 | Ideally, the topographic and bathymetric data |
---|
6 | should adequately capture all complex features |
---|
7 | of the underlying bathymetry and topography. Any limitations |
---|
8 | in the resolution and accuracy of the data will introduce |
---|
9 | errors to the inundation maps, in addition to the range of approximations |
---|
10 | made within the model. |
---|
11 | |
---|
12 | %In this study, we used the Australian Height Datum (AHD) |
---|
13 | %as the vertical datum. Mean Sea Level (MSL) is approximately equal to |
---|
14 | %0m AHD with the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) |
---|
15 | %and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) defined as \?m AHD |
---|
16 | %and \?m AHD respectively for Hobart \cite{antt:06}. |
---|
17 | |
---|
18 | Data for this study have been supplied by the |
---|
19 | Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, |
---|
20 | who provided a |
---|
21 | 12.5m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) |
---|
22 | covering the South East of Tasmania. The DEM has been constructed from |
---|
23 | 10 and 20m contour lines. |
---|
24 | |
---|
25 | With respect to the offshore data, the Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd (Tasports) |
---|
26 | provided state digital |
---|
27 | fairsheet data around |
---|
28 | Hobart, in particular the Derwent River. |
---|
29 | This data covers a very small geographic area but high density. |
---|
30 | Additional data was provided from |
---|
31 | University of Tasmania. |
---|
32 | The Australian Hydrographic Office (AHO) has supplied extensive |
---|
33 | fairsheet data which has also been utilised. In contrast to the onshore data, |
---|
34 | the offshore data is a series of survey points which is typically |
---|
35 | not supplied on a fixed grid. In addition, offshore data typically |
---|
36 | does not have the coverage of the onshore data, and often the |
---|
37 | offshore data will have gaps where surveys have not been conducted. |
---|
38 | The coastline has been generated by ... |
---|
39 | |
---|
40 | %Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare}(a) shows the contour lines for |
---|
41 | %HAT, MSL and LAT for the study area using the data described above. |
---|
42 | |
---|
43 | |
---|
44 | %\begin{figure}[p] |
---|
45 | |
---|
46 | % \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm] |
---|
47 | %{../report_figures/onslow_dted_contour.jpg}} |
---|
48 | |
---|
49 | % \caption{Study region showing the m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) |
---|
50 | % and m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the AHO and Tasmanian data.} |
---|
51 | % \label{fig:contours} |
---|
52 | |
---|
53 | %\end{figure} |
---|
54 | |
---|
55 | |
---|
56 | Appendix \ref{sec:metadata} provides more details and the supporting metadata |
---|
57 | for this study, including images of the data extent. |
---|
58 | Table \ref{table:data} summarises the available data. |
---|
59 | |
---|
60 | \begin{table} |
---|
61 | \caption{Available data for the South East Tasmania tsunami inundation study.} |
---|
62 | \label{table:data} |
---|
63 | \begin{center} |
---|
64 | \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline |
---|
65 | Data & Specifications \\ \hline |
---|
66 | DPIW & Onshore, 12.5m DEM \\ \hline |
---|
67 | UTAS & Offshore, sonar soundings \\ \hline |
---|
68 | Tasports & Offshore, sonar soundings \\ \hline |
---|
69 | AHO & Offshore, fairsheet data for the study region \\ \hline |
---|
70 | \end{tabular} |
---|
71 | \end{center} |
---|
72 | \end{table} |
---|
73 | |
---|
74 | |
---|
75 | \pagebreak |
---|
76 | |
---|