source: inundation/report_generation/report_fesa_project_v1.tex @ 2703

\documentclass[reqno]{article}
\usepackage{ae} % or {zefonts}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ansinew]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
% \Add{} and \Del{} Corrections and \Mark{}
%\usepackage[active,new,noold,marker]{xrcs}
\usepackage{eurosym}
\DeclareInputText{128}{\euro} % ANSI code for euro: € \usepackage{eurosym}
\DeclareInputText{165}{\yen}  % ANSI code for yen:  ¥ \usepackage{amssymb}

\usepackage{lscape} %landcape pages support
%\input{definitions}

\title{Tsunami impact modelling for NW shelf}
\date{}

\begin{document}

\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
\end{abstract}


\tableofcontents

\section{Introduction}

This report is being provided to the Fire and Emergency Services Authority (FESA) 
as part of the Collaborative Research Agreement with Geoscience Australia. 
The report describes the methods, assumptions and results of tsunami inundation 
scenarios for two areas in the North West shelf region of the West Australian 
coastline, namely Onslow and Pt Hedland. 

Describe why this work is being done – exposure, vulnerability – 
understand impact and risk to tsunami hazard.

The current results represent ongoing work and may change in the future.

The software tool, ANUGA, has been used to develop the inundation extent 
and associated water height at various points in space and time. 
ANUGA has been developed by GA and ANU to solve the nonlinear shallow water 
wave equation using the finite volume technique (described in [1]). 
An advantage of this technique is that the cell resolution can be changed 
according to areas of interest.

The following set of information is necessary input to undertake the tsunami 
impact modelling.

\begin{itemize}
\item onshore and offshore data
\item initial condition
\item boundary condition
\end{itemize}

\section{Data sources}

The runup height and resulting inundation ashore is determined by the input 
topographic and bathymetric data, the forcing terms as well as the initial 
and boundary conditions. It would be ideal if the data adequately captures 
all complex features of the underlying bathymetry and topography. 

What can we say about the data used here? How happy?


\section{Tsunami scenarios}

\begin{figure}[hbt]

  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{examples/.eps}}

  \caption{Source zones of influence}
  \label{fig:source}
\end{figure}



\section{Inundation modelling results}

Do we have to combine any data? If so, comment.
%\include{interpretation.tex}
\begin{figure}[hbt]

  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{examples/.eps}}

  \caption{Study area for scenario 1: Onslow}
  \label{fig:onslow_area}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hbt]

  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{examples/.eps}}

  \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area}
  \label{fig:mesh_onslow}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hbt]

  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{examples/.eps}}

  \caption{Study area for scenario 2: Pt Hedland}
  \label{fig:pthedland_area}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hbt]

  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{examples/.eps}}

  \caption{Computational mesh for Pt Hedland study area}
  \label{fig:mesh_pthedland}
\end{figure}

Time series at relevant gauge locations - INSERT RESULTS HERE ( insert generated
latex file)


\section{Summary}

\section{References}

\end{document}