1 | |
---|
2 | The software tool, ANUGA \cite{ON:modsim}, has been used to develop the |
---|
3 | inundation extent |
---|
4 | and associated water level at various points in space and time. |
---|
5 | ANUGA has been developed by GA and the Australian National University |
---|
6 | (ANU) to solve the nonlinear shallow water |
---|
7 | wave equation using the finite volume technique. |
---|
8 | An advantage of this technique is that the cell area can be changed |
---|
9 | according to areas of interest and that wetting and drying |
---|
10 | is treated robustly as part of the numerical scheme. |
---|
11 | ANUGA is continually being developed and validated. |
---|
12 | As such, the current results represent ongoing work |
---|
13 | and may change in the future. |
---|
14 | |
---|
15 | The following set of information is required to undertake the |
---|
16 | inundation modelling; |
---|
17 | |
---|
18 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
19 | \item onshore and offshore elevation data (topographic and bathymetric data, |
---|
20 | see Section \ref{sec:data}) |
---|
21 | \item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides) |
---|
22 | \item boundary condition (the tsunami source as described in |
---|
23 | Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}) |
---|
24 | \item forcing terms (such as wind) |
---|
25 | \item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction |
---|
26 | \end{itemize} |
---|
27 | |
---|
28 | As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the |
---|
29 | extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts |
---|
30 | from the |
---|
31 | event. However, throughout the modelling process, a number of issues became |
---|
32 | evident. A standard assumption is that zero Australian Height Datum |
---|
33 | (AHD) is approximately |
---|
34 | the same as Mean Sea Level (MSL). Implementing the values provided for |
---|
35 | Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) |
---|
36 | would inundate some regions of Onslow before the simulation is even begun. |
---|
37 | Further, the recorded value for HAT will not be identical at each |
---|
38 | point along the coastline. There |
---|
39 | is evidence suggesting different high tide marks (with respect |
---|
40 | to a set datum) within |
---|
41 | a localised region. As an aside, a current GA contract is |
---|
42 | extracting information from LANDSAT imagery to reconstruct the |
---|
43 | tidal variations for various WA locations. Future modelling of |
---|
44 | these areas will incorporate this information. |
---|
45 | Further, the dynamics of |
---|
46 | tidal effects (that is, the changes in water height over time for |
---|
47 | the entire study area) is not currently modelled. |
---|
48 | In the simulations provided in this report, we assume that |
---|
49 | increase of water height for the initial condition is spatially consistent |
---|
50 | for the study region. |
---|
51 | |
---|
52 | We use three initial conditions in this report; |
---|
53 | -1.5m AHD, 0m AHD and 1.5m AHD. Figure \ref{fig:ic} shows the Onslow region |
---|
54 | with the 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD contour lines shown. It is evident then |
---|
55 | that much of Onslow would be inundated at a uniform tide at 1.5m AHD. |
---|
56 | Bottom friction will generally provide resistance to the water flow |
---|
57 | and thus reduce the impact somewhat. However, it is an open area |
---|
58 | of research on how to determine the friction coefficients, and |
---|
59 | thus it has not been incorporated |
---|
60 | in the scenarios presented in this report. Therefore, the |
---|
61 | results presented are over estimated to some degree. |
---|
62 | |
---|
63 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
64 | |
---|
65 | \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm] |
---|
66 | {../report_figures/contours.jpg}} |
---|
67 | |
---|
68 | \caption{Onslow regions showing the 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD contour lines.} |
---|
69 | \label{fig:ic} |
---|
70 | \end{figure} |
---|
71 | |
---|
72 | |
---|
73 | |
---|
74 | |
---|