source: production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex @ 3174

Last change on this file since 3174 was 3171, checked in by sexton, 19 years ago

more updates

File size: 3.2 KB
Line 
1
2The software tool, ANUGA \cite{ON:modsim}, has been used to develop the
3inundation extent
4and associated water level at various points in space and time.
5ANUGA has been developed by GA and the Australian National University
6(ANU) to solve the nonlinear shallow water
7wave equation using the finite volume technique.
8An advantage of this technique is that the cell area can be changed
9according to areas of interest and that wetting and drying
10is treated robustly as part of the numerical scheme.
11ANUGA is continually being developed and validated.
12As such, the current results represent ongoing work
13and may change in the future.
14
15The following set of information is required to undertake the
16inundation modelling;
17
18\begin{itemize}
19\item onshore and offshore elevation data (topographic and bathymetric data,
20see Section \ref{sec:data})
21\item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides)
22\item boundary condition (the tsunami source as described in
23Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario})
24\item forcing terms (such as wind)
25\item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction
26\end{itemize}
27
28As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the
29extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts
30from the
31event. However, throughout the modelling process, a number of issues became
32evident. A standard assumption is that zero Australian Height Datum
33(AHD) is approximately
34the same as Mean Sea Level (MSL). Implementing the values provided for
35Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT)
36would inundate some regions of Onslow before the simulation is even begun.
37Further, the recorded value for HAT will not be identical at each
38point along the coastline. There
39is evidence suggesting different high tide marks (with respect
40to a set datum) within
41a localised region. As an aside, a current GA contract is
42extracting information from LANDSAT imagery to reconstruct the
43tidal variations for various WA locations. Future modelling of
44these areas will incorporate this information.
45Further, the dynamics of
46tidal effects (that is, the changes in water height over time for
47the entire study area) is not currently modelled.
48In the simulations provided in this report, we assume that
49increase of water height for the initial condition is spatially consistent
50for the study region.
51
52We use three initial conditions in this report;
53-1.5m AHD, 0m AHD and 1.5m AHD. Figure \ref{fig:ic} shows the Onslow region
54with the 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD contour lines shown. It is evident then
55that much of Onslow would be inundated at a uniform tide at 1.5m AHD.
56Bottom friction will generally provide resistance to the water flow
57and thus reduce the impact somewhat. However, it is an open area
58of research on how to determine the friction coefficients, and
59thus it has not been incorporated
60in the scenarios presented in this report. Therefore, the
61results presented are over estimated to some degree.
62
63\begin{figure}[hbt]
64
65  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
66{../report_figures/contours.jpg}}
67
68  \caption{Onslow regions showing the 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD contour lines.}
69  \label{fig:ic}
70\end{figure}
71
72
73
74
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.