source: production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex @ 3158

Last change on this file since 3158 was 3157, checked in by sexton, 19 years ago

minor textual updates

File size: 3.6 KB
Line 
1
2The software tool, ANUGA \cite{ON:modsim}, has been used to develop the
3inundation extent
4and associated water height at various points in space and time.
5ANUGA has been developed by GA and the Australian National University
6(ANU) to solve the nonlinear shallow water
7wave equation using the finite volume technique.
8An advantage of this technique is that the cell area can be changed
9according to areas of interest and that wetting and drying
10is treated robustly as part of the numerical scheme.
11ANUGA is continually being developed and validated.
12As such, the current results represent ongoing work
13and may change in the future.
14
15The following set of information is required to undertake the tsunami
16inundation modelling;
17
18\begin{itemize}
19\item onshore and offshore elevation data (topographic and bathymetric data,
20see Section \ref{sec:data})
21\item initial condition (e.g. determined by tides)
22\item boundary condition (the tsunami source as described in
23Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario})
24\item forcing terms (such as wind)
25\item definition of a mesh parameter values
26\end{itemize}
27
28As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the
29ends of the tidal regimes to understand the potential impact of the
30event. Throughout the modelling process, a number of issues became
31evident. A standard assumption is that zero AHD is approximately
32the same as Mean Sea Level (MSL). Implementing the values provided for
33Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT)
34would inundate some regions of Onslow before the simulation is even begun.
35Further, the recorded value for HAT will not be identical at each
36point along the coastline. There
37is enough evidence suggesting different high tide marks (with respect
38to a set datum) within
39a localised region. As an aside, a current GA contract is
40extracting information from LANDSAT imagery to reconstruct the
41tidal variations for various WA locations. Future modelling of
42these areas will incorporate this information.
43Further, the dynamics of
44tidal effects (that is, the changes in water height over time for
45the entire study area) is not currently modelled.
46In the simulations provided in this report, we assume that
47increase of water height for the initial condition is spatially consistently
48for the study region.
49
50We use three initial conditions in this report;
51-1.5 AHD, 0 AHD and 1.5 AHD. Figure \ref{fig:ic} shows the Onslow region
52with the 1.5 AHD and -1.5 AHD contour lines shown. It is evident then
53that much of Onslow would be inundated at 1.5 AHD.
54
55
56\begin{figure}[hbt]
57
58  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
59{../report_figures/contours.jpg}}
60
61  \caption{Onslow regions showing the 1.5 AHD and -1.5 AHD contour lines.}
62  \label{fig:ic}
63\end{figure}
64
65
66It is important
67to refine the model areas to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in
68those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal
69zone and estuaries. In modelling the tsunami wave in deep water,
70it is suggested that the minimum model resolution
71be such so that there are at least
72ten cells per wavelength. The modelling
73undertaken to develop the preliminary hazard map \cite{BC:FESA}
74used a
75grid resolution which can adequately model tsunamis with a
76wavelength of 50km. Bottom friction has not been incorporated
77in the scenarios presented in this report. It
78can be accommodated in ANUGA as a forcing term, however, it is an
79open area of research on how to determine the friction coefficients.
80Therefore, the results presented are overly compensated to some degree.
81
82
83
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.