1 | To initiate the modelling, a computational triangular mesh is constructed to |
---|
2 | cover the study regions which has an area of around 6300 km$^2$. |
---|
3 | The cell size is chosen to balance |
---|
4 | computational time and desired resolution in areas of interest, |
---|
5 | particularly in the interface between the on and offshore. |
---|
6 | Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area} illustrates the data extent for the |
---|
7 | scenario, the study area and where further mesh refinement has been made. |
---|
8 | The choice |
---|
9 | of the refinement is based around the important inter-tidal zones and |
---|
10 | other important features such as islands and rivers. The most northern |
---|
11 | boundary of the study area is placed approximately around the 100m contour |
---|
12 | line. |
---|
13 | |
---|
14 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
15 | |
---|
16 | \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm] |
---|
17 | {../report_figures/onslow_data_poly.png}} |
---|
18 | |
---|
19 | \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario highlighting areas of increased |
---|
20 | refinement. |
---|
21 | The underlying data is as in Figure \ref{fig:onslowdataarea}.} |
---|
22 | \label{fig:onslow_area} |
---|
23 | \end{figure} |
---|
24 | |
---|
25 | For the simulations, we have chosen a cell area of 500 m$^2$ per triangle |
---|
26 | for the |
---|
27 | region surrounding the Onslow town centre. It is worth noting here that |
---|
28 | the cell |
---|
29 | area will be the maximum cell area within the defined region and that each |
---|
30 | cell in |
---|
31 | the region does not necessarily have the same area. The cell area is increased |
---|
32 | to 2500 m$^2$ for the region surrounding the coast and further increased |
---|
33 | to 20000 m$^2$ for the region reaching approximately the 50m contour line. |
---|
34 | The remainder of the study area has a cell area of 100000 m$^2$. |
---|
35 | The resultant computational mesh is then seen in Figure \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}. |
---|
36 | |
---|
37 | With these cell areas in place, the study area consists of 440150 triangles |
---|
38 | in which water levels and momentums are tracked through time. |
---|
39 | The associated lateral accuracy |
---|
40 | for these cell areas is approximatly 30m, 70m, 200m and 445m for the respective |
---|
41 | areas. This means |
---|
42 | that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation extent to |
---|
43 | approximately 30m lateral accuracy within the Onslow town centre. |
---|
44 | Referring to the discussion in Section \ref{sec:anuga}, it is important |
---|
45 | to refine the mesh to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in |
---|
46 | those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal |
---|
47 | zone and estuaries. Our choice of cell area for the region surrounding the |
---|
48 | Onslow town centre is commensurate with the onshore data used for this study |
---|
49 | (see Section \ref{sec:data}). In contrast to the onshore data, the offshore |
---|
50 | data is a series of survey points which is typically not supplied on a fixed |
---|
51 | grid which complicates the issue of determining an appropriate cell area. |
---|
52 | If we refer to the discussion in Section \ref{sec:data} |
---|
53 | on modelling a tsunami wave in deep water, we can determine an appropriate |
---|
54 | cell area for the deeper water. Here, |
---|
55 | the wavelength of the tsunami wave is approximately 20km |
---|
56 | near the boundary, which indicates that our cell area is more than adequate |
---|
57 | to propagate the tsunami wave. |
---|
58 | |
---|
59 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
60 | |
---|
61 | \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm] |
---|
62 | {../report_figures/mesh.jpg}} |
---|
63 | |
---|
64 | \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area.} |
---|
65 | \label{fig:mesh_onslow} |
---|
66 | \end{figure} |
---|
67 | |
---|
68 | |
---|
69 | |
---|