source: production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex @ 3156

Last change on this file since 3156 was 3079, checked in by sexton, 19 years ago

small updates

File size: 3.2 KB
Line 
1To initiate the modelling, a computational triangular mesh is constructed to
2cover the study regions which has an area of around 6300 km$^2$.
3The cell size is chosen to balance
4computational time and desired resolution in areas of interest,
5particularly in the interface between the on and offshore.
6Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area} illustrates the data extent for the
7scenario, the study area and where further mesh refinement has been made.
8The choice
9of the refinement is based around the important inter-tidal zones and
10other important features such as islands and rivers. The most northern
11boundary of the study area is placed approximately around the 100m contour
12line.
13
14\begin{figure}[hbt]
15
16  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
17             {../report_figures/onslow_data_poly.png}}
18
19  \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario highlighting areas of increased
20refinement.
21The underlying data is as in Figure \ref{fig:onslowdataarea}.}
22  \label{fig:onslow_area}
23\end{figure}
24
25For the simulations, we have chosen a cell area of 500 m$^2$ per triangle
26for the
27region surrounding the Onslow town centre. It is worth noting here that
28the cell
29area will be the maximum cell area within the defined region and that each
30cell in
31the region does not necessarily have the same area. The cell area is increased
32to 2500 m$^2$ for the region surrounding the coast and further increased
33to 20000 m$^2$ for the region reaching approximately the 50m contour line.
34The remainder of the study area has a cell area of 100000 m$^2$.
35The resultant computational mesh is then seen in Figure \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}.
36
37With these cell areas in place, the study area consists of 440150 triangles
38in which water levels and momentums are tracked through time.
39The associated lateral accuracy
40for these cell areas is approximatly 30m, 70m, 200m and 445m for the respective
41areas. This means
42that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation extent to
43approximately 30m lateral accuracy within the Onslow town centre.
44Referring to the discussion in Section \ref{sec:anuga}, it is important
45to refine the mesh to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in
46those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal
47zone and estuaries. Our choice of cell area for the region surrounding the
48Onslow town centre is commensurate with the onshore data used for this study
49(see Section \ref{sec:data}). In contrast to the onshore data, the offshore
50data is a series of survey points which is typically not supplied on a fixed
51grid which complicates the issue of determining an appropriate cell area.
52If we refer to the discussion in Section \ref{sec:data} 
53on modelling a tsunami wave in deep water, we can determine an appropriate
54cell area for the deeper water. Here,
55the wavelength of the tsunami wave is approximately 20km
56near the boundary, which indicates that our cell area is more than adequate
57to propagate the tsunami wave.
58
59\begin{figure}[hbt]
60
61  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
62              {../report_figures/mesh.jpg}}
63
64  \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area.}
65  \label{fig:mesh_onslow}
66\end{figure}
67
68
69
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.