source: production/onslow_2006/report/data.tex @ 3240

Last change on this file since 3240 was 3188, checked in by sexton, 19 years ago

make gauges to compare MOST and ANUGA time series

File size: 2.7 KB
Line 
1The calculated run-up height and resulting inundation ashore is determined by
2the input topographic and bathymetric elevation, the forcing terms, the
3initial and boundary conditions, as well as the cell area of the computational
4mesh.
5Ideally, the data should adequately capture all complex features
6of the underlying bathymetry and topography and that mesh
7is commensurate with the underlying data, as discussed in
8Section \ref{sec:anuga}. Any limitations
9in the resolution and accuracy of the data will introduce
10errors to the inundation maps, in addition to the range of approximations
11made within the model.
12
13Data for this study have been sourced from a number of agencies. With
14respect to the onshore data, the Defence Imagery and Geospatial
15Organisation (DIGO) supplied the DTED (Digital Terrain Elevation
16Data) Level 2 data which has been authorised for Australian Tsunami
17Warning System use only. This data has a resolution of 1 second
18(about 30 metres), produced from 1:50 000 contours, elevations and
19drainage. In addition, the Department of Land Information (DLI) has provided a
2020m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and orthophotography
21covering the NW Shelf. However, the 30m
22DTED Level 2 data is ``bare earth'' whereas the DLI data is distorted by
23vegetation
24and buildings so we have chosen to use the DTED as the onshore
25topographic data set. It is also important to note that the DEM does
26not include features such as rock walls, berths etc.
27
28With respect to the offshore data, the Department of Planning and
29Infrastructure (DPI) have provided state digital fairsheet data around
30Onslow. This data covers only a very small geographic area. (Note,
31similar data has been provided for Pt Hedland and Broome by DPI.)
32The Australian Hydrographic Office (AHO) has supplied extensive
33fairsheet data which has also been utilised.
34
35In summary,
36
37\begin{center}
38\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
39Data & Detail \\ \hline 
40DIGO DTED Level 2  & Onshore, 1 second $\approx$ 30m \\ \hline 
41DLI & Onshore, 20m DEM and orthophotography \\ \hline
42DPI & Offshore, fairsheet data around Onslow \\ \hline
43AHO & Offshore, fairsheet data for North West Shelf region \\ \hline
44\end{tabular}
45\end{center}
46
47The coastline has been generated from the DIGO DTED Level 2 and modified
48using the aerial photography and two detailed surveys provided
49by WA Department of Planning and Infrastructure.
50
51%\begin{figure}[hbt]
52%
53%  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
54%{../report_figures/onslow_data_extent.png}}
55%
56%  \caption{Data extent for Onslow scenario. Offshore data shown in blue
57%and onshore data in green.}
58%  \label{fig:onslowdataarea}
59%\end{figure}
60
61Section \ref{sec:metadata} provides more details and metadata for data used for
62this study.
63
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.