1 | The main features of the |
---|
2 | tsunami wave and resultant impact ashore is described in this section. |
---|
3 | To assist this description, we have |
---|
4 | chosen a number of locations which we believe would be important |
---|
5 | in an emergency situation, such as the hospital and power station, or |
---|
6 | effect recovery efforts, such as the airport and docks. These locations |
---|
7 | are described in Table \ref{table:locations} and shown in |
---|
8 | Figure \ref{fig:points}. The water's stage and speed are shown |
---|
9 | as a function of time in the series of graphs shown in |
---|
10 | Appendix \ref{sec:timeseries}. Stage is defined as the absolute |
---|
11 | water level relative to AHD. Both stage and speed are shown |
---|
12 | on consistent scales to allow comparison between point locations. |
---|
13 | %The graphs show these time series for |
---|
14 | %the three cases; 1.5m AHD, 0m AHD and -1.5m AHD so that comparisons can |
---|
15 | %be made. |
---|
16 | As a useful benchmark, Table \ref{table:speedexamples} |
---|
17 | describes typical examples for a range of velocities found in the |
---|
18 | simulations. |
---|
19 | |
---|
20 | \begin{table} |
---|
21 | \begin{center} |
---|
22 | \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.} |
---|
23 | \label{table:speedexamples} |
---|
24 | \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline |
---|
25 | {\bf Velocity (m/s)} & {\bf Example} \\ \hline |
---|
26 | 1 & leisurely stroll pace\\ \hline |
---|
27 | 1.5 & average walking pace \\ \hline |
---|
28 | 2 & 100m Olympic male freestyle \\ \hline |
---|
29 | 3 & mackeral \\ \hline |
---|
30 | 4 & average person maintain for 1000m \\ \hline |
---|
31 | 5 & blue whale \\ \hline |
---|
32 | 10 & 100m Olympic male sprinter \\ \hline |
---|
33 | 16 & car travelling in urban zones (60 km/hr) \\ \hline |
---|
34 | \end{tabular} |
---|
35 | \end{center} |
---|
36 | \end{table} |
---|
37 | |
---|
38 | Examining the offshore locations shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseries}, |
---|
39 | the drawdown prior to the tsunami wave |
---|
40 | arriving at the shore can be seen to occur around 230 mins |
---|
41 | (3.8 hours) after the tsunami is generated. |
---|
42 | Prior to the drawdown, maximum amplitudes are approximately 50cm at |
---|
43 | West of Groyne (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeWestofGroyne}) and |
---|
44 | the mouth of Beadon Creek |
---|
45 | (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonCreekmouth}), for example. |
---|
46 | The first wave |
---|
47 | after the drawdown ranges from approximately 2m in the |
---|
48 | west of Beadon Bay (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonBaywest}) |
---|
49 | to 1.5m in the east of Beadon Bay |
---|
50 | (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonBayeast}). |
---|
51 | The speed |
---|
52 | sharply increases at drawdown with further increases as the |
---|
53 | wave grows in amplitude. |
---|
54 | There is an increased amplitude of approximately 3m found in |
---|
55 | east of Beadon Bay for the secondary wave, as opposed to the first wave. |
---|
56 | This feature is also evident at the West of Groyne location. |
---|
57 | This may be due to the geography of the bay, including the groyne west of |
---|
58 | the creek mouth opening, the local bathymetry |
---|
59 | and the direction of the tsunami wave. |
---|
60 | |
---|
61 | The maximum speed found for the offshore locations occur at the West of |
---|
62 | Groyne location (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeWestofGroyne}) |
---|
63 | with speeds halved at the Beadon Bay west location. |
---|
64 | The speed at west of Beadon Bay is greater than the east of Beadon |
---|
65 | Bay location (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonBayeast}). |
---|
66 | There is similar differences in amplitude (from drawdown to maximum |
---|
67 | amplitude), however, the western location is in deeper water than the eastern |
---|
68 | location which may indicate the increased speed found in the east of the |
---|
69 | bay. Subsequent drawdowns are seen as the multitude of waves which make up the |
---|
70 | event (see Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}) propagate towards the shore. |
---|
71 | |
---|
72 | %At some gauge locations, these |
---|
73 | %subsequent waves cause significantly increased inundation than that of |
---|
74 | %the first wave. This is particularly seen at the Beadon Creek Docks, |
---|
75 | %West of Groyne and Beadon Creek locations. |
---|
76 | |
---|
77 | It is evident that the sand dunes west of |
---|
78 | Onslow are very effective in halting the tsunami wave which rise to approximately |
---|
79 | 10m in height, |
---|
80 | see Figure \ref{fig:MSL_max_inundation}. |
---|
81 | %There is inundation between the sand dunes at high |
---|
82 | %tide, Figure \ref{fig:HAT_max_inundation}, however, this water |
---|
83 | %penetrated from the north east (via |
---|
84 | %Onslow town centre) rather than seaward. |
---|
85 | The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow which |
---|
86 | rise to 15m in height. Currently, we do not model changes |
---|
87 | to the bathymetry or topography due to effects of the water flow. |
---|
88 | Therefore, we do not know whether these sand dunes would withstand the |
---|
89 | transmitted energy of the tsunami wave. |
---|
90 | The tsunami wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with wave height |
---|
91 | approximately 2m at the mouth |
---|
92 | (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonCreekmouth}) |
---|
93 | and inundation |
---|
94 | exceeding 1m found at the Beadon Creek south of dock location (Figure |
---|
95 | \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonCreeksouthofdock}). |
---|
96 | %The wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with increasingly |
---|
97 | %greater inundation between the -1.5m AHD and 1.5m AHD simulations. |
---|
98 | |
---|
99 | %As expected, there is greater inundation at 1.5m AHD. The major road |
---|
100 | %into Onslow, the Onslow Mount Stuart Rd, remains free of inundation for |
---|
101 | %all simulations. Beadon Creek Rd which services the wharf in the |
---|
102 | %river becomes increasingly inundated as the initial condition |
---|
103 | %changes from 0m AHD to 1.5m AHD. Only the |
---|
104 | %entry to the wharf on Beadon Creek Rd is sufficiently inundated at -1.5m AHD |
---|
105 | %to stop traffic. At 1.5m AHD however, essentially the entire road |
---|
106 | %would be impassable. |
---|
107 | |
---|
108 | %There is significant inundation of at |
---|
109 | %least 2m on the foreshore of Onslow for 0m AHD and 1.5m AHD. |
---|
110 | %The inundation extent increases the initial condition increases above 0m AHD, |
---|
111 | %pushing the edges |
---|
112 | %of the majority of the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre. |
---|
113 | There is significant inundation of at least 2m on the foreshore of Onslow. |
---|
114 | The major road into Onslow, the Onslow Mount Stuart Rd, remains free |
---|
115 | of inundation, however there is some inundation on Beadon Creek Rd |
---|
116 | which services the wharf in the river. |
---|