1 | To initiate the modelling, the computational mesh is constructed to |
---|
2 | cover the available data. The resolution is chosen to balance |
---|
3 | computational time and desired resolution in areas of interest, |
---|
4 | particularly in the interface between the on and offshore. The |
---|
5 | following figure illustrates the data extent for the |
---|
6 | scenario and where further mesh refinement has been made. The choice |
---|
7 | of the refinement is based around the important inter-tidal zones and |
---|
8 | other important features such as islands and rivers. The most northern |
---|
9 | boundary of the study area is placed approximately around the 100m contour |
---|
10 | line. |
---|
11 | The resultant computational mesh is then seen in \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}. |
---|
12 | |
---|
13 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
14 | |
---|
15 | \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/onslow_data_poly.png}} |
---|
16 | |
---|
17 | \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario highlighting areas of increased refinement.} |
---|
18 | \label{fig:onslow_area} |
---|
19 | \end{figure} |
---|
20 | |
---|
21 | |
---|
22 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
23 | |
---|
24 | %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}} |
---|
25 | |
---|
26 | \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area} |
---|
27 | \label{fig:mesh_onslow} |
---|
28 | \end{figure} |
---|
29 | |
---|
30 | For the simulations, we have chosen a resolution of 500 m$^2$ for the |
---|
31 | region surrounding the Onslow town centre. The resolution is increased |
---|
32 | to 2500 m$^2$ for the region surrounding the coast and further increased |
---|
33 | to 20000 m$^2$ for the region reaching approximately the 50m contour line. |
---|
34 | The remainder of the study area has a resolution of 100000 m$^2$. |
---|
35 | With these resolutions in place, the study area consists of 440150 triangles. |
---|
36 | The associated accuracy |
---|
37 | for these resolutions is approximatly 22m, 50m, 140m and 315m for the increasing |
---|
38 | resolutions. This means |
---|
39 | that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation to approximately |
---|
40 | 22m accuracy within the Onslow town centre. |
---|
41 | This is because ANUGA calculates whether each cell in the triangular |
---|
42 | mesh is wet or dry. It is important |
---|
43 | to refine the mesh to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in |
---|
44 | those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal |
---|
45 | zone and estuaries. |
---|
46 | |
---|
47 | The following subsections detail the time series at select locations |
---|
48 | for high, low and zero tide conditions. These locations have |
---|
49 | been chosen to assist in describing the features of the tsunami wave |
---|
50 | and the resultant impact ashore. It is evident from \ref{fig:ic_high} |
---|
51 | that the DEM ... |
---|
52 | |
---|
53 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
54 | |
---|
55 | %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}} |
---|
56 | |
---|
57 | \caption{Initial condition for mean sea level.} |
---|
58 | \label{fig:ic_zero} |
---|
59 | \end{figure} |
---|
60 | |
---|
61 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
62 | |
---|
63 | %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}} |
---|
64 | |
---|
65 | \caption{Initial condition for lowest astronomical tide.} |
---|
66 | \label{fig:ic_low} |
---|
67 | \end{figure} |
---|
68 | |
---|
69 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
---|
70 | |
---|
71 | %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}} |
---|
72 | |
---|
73 | \caption{Initial condition for highest astronomical tide.} |
---|
74 | \label{fig:ic_high} |
---|
75 | \end{figure} |
---|
76 | |
---|
77 | |
---|
78 | What are the features of the tsunami wave? |
---|
79 | direction? multiple waves? amplitude offshore? |
---|
80 | |
---|
81 | It is evident for each simulation that the sand dunes west of Onslow |
---|
82 | are very effective in halting the tsunami wave. The height of these |
---|
83 | sand dunes are approximately 10m which is more than enough to halt |
---|
84 | the largest of the tsunami waves which occurs for the |
---|
85 | high tide simulation. There is inundation between the sand dunes at high |
---|
86 | tide, however, this water penetrated from the north east (via |
---|
87 | Onslow town cetnre) rather than seaward. |
---|
88 | The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow which |
---|
89 | rise to 15m in height. Currently, ANUGA can not model changes |
---|
90 | to the bathymetry or topography due to effects of the water flow. |
---|
91 | Therefore, we do not know whether these sand dunes would withstand the |
---|
92 | transmitted energy of the tsunami wave. |
---|
93 | |
---|
94 | The wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with increasingly |
---|
95 | greater inundation as the tide changes from LAT to HAT. |
---|
96 | |
---|
97 | As expected, there is greater inundation at high tide. The major road |
---|
98 | into Onslow, the Onslow Mount Stuart Rd, remains free of inundation for |
---|
99 | all tidal scenarios. Beadon Creek Rd which services the wharf in the |
---|
100 | river becomes increasingly inundated as the tide rises. Only the |
---|
101 | entry to the wharf on Beadon Creek Rd is sufficiently inundated at LAT |
---|
102 | to stop traffic. At HAT however, essentially the entire road |
---|
103 | would be impassable. |
---|
104 | |
---|
105 | There is significant inundation of at |
---|
106 | least 2m on the foreshore of Onslow for zero and high tide. |
---|
107 | The inundation extent increases as the tide rises, pushing the edges |
---|
108 | of the majority of the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre. |
---|