source: production/onslow_2006/results.tex @ 2917

Last change on this file since 2917 was 2901, checked in by sexton, 18 years ago

few minor changes

File size: 3.4 KB
Line 
1To initiate the modelling, the computational mesh is constructed to
2cover the available data. The resolution is chosen to balance
3computational time and desired resolution in areas of interest,
4particularly in the interface between the on and offshore. The
5following figures illustrate the study extent for the
6scenario and the resulting computational mesh, highlighting areas
7of refinement around areas of particular interest.
8
9\begin{figure}[hbt]
10
11  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{.png}}
12
13  \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario}
14  \label{fig:onslow_area}
15\end{figure}
16
17
18\begin{figure}[hbt]
19
20  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=75mm, height=75mm]{.png}}
21
22  \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area}
23  \label{fig:mesh_onslow}
24\end{figure}
25
26For the simulations, we have chosen a resolution of 500 m$^2$ for the
27region surrounding the Onslow town centre. The resolution is increased
28to 2500 m$^2$ for the region surrounding the coast and further increased
29to 20000 m$^2$ for the remainder of the study area. With these
30resolutions in place, the study area consists of 440150 triangles. The
31associated accuracy
32for these resolutions is approximatly 22m, 50m and to 140m. This means
33that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation to approximately
3422m accuracy. This is because ANUGA calculates whether each cell in the
35triangular
36mesh is wet or dry. It is important
37to refine the mesh to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in
38those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal
39zone and estuaries.
40
41The following subsections detail the time series at select locations
42for high, low and zero tide conditions. These locations have
43been chosen to assist in describing the features of the tsunami wave
44and the resultant impact ashore.
45
46What are the features of the tsunami wave?
47direction? multiple waves? amplitude offshore?
48
49It is evident for each simulation that the sand dunes west of Onslow
50are very effective in halting the tsunami wave. The height of these
51sand dunes are approximately 10m which is more than enough to halt
52the largest of the tsunami waves which occurs for the
53high tide simulation. There is inundation between the sand dunes at high
54tide, however, this water penetrated from the north east (via
55Onslow town cetnre) rather than seaward.
56The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow which
57rise to 15m in height. Currently, ANUGA can not model changes
58to the bathymetry or topography due to effects of the water flow.
59Therefore, we do not know whether these sand dunes would withstand the
60transmitted energy of the tsunami wave.
61
62The wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with increasingly
63greater inundation as the tide changes from LAT to HAT.
64
65As expected, there is greater inundation at high tide. The major road
66into Onslow, the Onslow Mount Stuart Rd, remains free of inundation for
67all tidal scenarios. Beadon Creek Rd which services the wharf in the
68river becomes increasingly inundated as the tide rises. Only the
69entry to the wharf on Beadon Creek Rd is sufficiently inundated at LAT
70to stop traffic. At HAT however, essentially the entire road
71would be impassable.
72
73There is significant inundation of at
74least 2m on the foreshore of Onslow for zero and high tide.
75The inundation extent increases as the tide rises, pushing the edges
76of the majority of the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre.
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.