Changeset 2844
- Timestamp:
- May 11, 2006, 2:15:18 PM (19 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
-
documentation/experimentation/smf.tex (modified) (10 diffs)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
documentation/experimentation/smf.tex
r2843 r2844 1 2 1 \documentclass[reqno]{article} 2 %\documentstyle{letter} 3 3 \usepackage{ae} % or {zefonts} 4 4 \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} … … 25 25 \advance\textwidth -2.5in 26 26 \setstretch{1.5} 27 \parindent 0pt 28 \parskip 2pt 27 29 28 30 %\title{Application of SMF surface elevation function in inundation modelling} … … 33 35 %\maketitle 34 36 35 \noindentMay 200637 May 2006 36 38 37 \noindentDr Phil Watts39 Dr Phil Watts 38 40 39 \noindentApplied Fluids Engineering41 Applied Fluids Engineering 40 42 41 \noindentLong Beach California43 Long Beach California 42 44 43 \noindentUSA45 USA 44 46 45 \noindentphil.watts@appliedfluids.com47 phil.watts@appliedfluids.com 46 48 47 \noindent Dear , 49 Dear Phil, 50 \parindent 15pt 48 51 49 52 {\bf Ref: Application of sediment mass failure surface elevation function … … 65 68 66 69 The risks posed by tsunamis is one of the natural hazards areas which 67 the RRG is investigating. GA can model the prop ogation of an event70 the RRG is investigating. GA can model the propagation of an event 68 71 generated through a submarine earthquake 69 72 through to inundation ashore. Currently, we are 70 73 employing the Method of Splitting Tsunami (MOST) [1] for the event 71 and subsequent prop ogation in deep water, and then use ANUGA to74 and subsequent propagation in deep water, and then use ANUGA to 72 75 propagate the resultant waves in shallow water and onshore. 73 76 … … 80 83 A recent tsunami inundation study called for the tsunami source to 81 84 be a slump and as such, we implemented the surface elevation 82 function as described in equation 14 of Watts et al 2005, [3]. 83 Which brings us to the reason for contacting you aswe have two questions.85 function as described in equation 14 of Watts et al 2005, [3]. The reason 86 then for our contact is that we have two questions. 84 87 85 88 {\bf Question 1:} Is there a physical explanation to why the volume … … 116 119 117 120 118 \begin{figure} [hbt]121 \begin{figure} 119 122 120 123 \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{volume_conservation.png}} … … 158 161 function, $\eta(x,y)$. 159 162 163 \parindent 0pt 164 160 165 We look forward to your response on these questions. 161 166 … … 166 171 Risk Research Group, Geoscience Australia. 167 172 168 \noindent{\bf References}173 {\bf References} 169 174 170 \noindent[1]175 [1] 171 176 Titov, V.V., and F.I. Gonzalez (1997), Implementation and testing of 172 177 the Method of Splitting Tsunami (MOST) model, NOAA Technical Memorandum 173 178 ERL PMEL-112. 174 179 175 \noindent176 180 [2] Nielsen, O., S. Robers, D. Gray, A. McPherson, and A. Hitchman (2005) 177 181 Hydrodynamic modelling of coastal inundation, MODSIM 2005 International 178 182 Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society 179 of Australian and New Zealand, 518-523, URL:183 of Australian and New Zealand, 518-523, \newline URL: 180 184 http://www.msanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/nielsen.pdf 181 185 182 \noindent183 186 [3] Watts, P., Grilli, S.T., Tappin, D.R. and Fryer, G.J., 2005, 184 187 Tsunami generation by submarine mass failure Part II: Predictive … … 186 189 Ocean Engineering, 131, 298 - 310. 187 190 188 \noindent189 191 [4] Grilli, S.T. and Watts, P., 2005, Tsunami generation by 190 192 submarine mass failure Part I: Modeling, experimental validation, … … 192 194 Ocean Engineering, 131, 283 - 297. 193 195 194 195 196 196 \end{document}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
