Changeset 2876


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 16, 2006, 1:55:13 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

updates to smf

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • documentation/experimentation/smf.tex

    r2874 r2876  
    104104$\kappa'$ is technically less than 1 for $\Delta x < 5.93$ it is
    105105effectively equal to 1 for those values. From this calculation, it would
    106 seem then that there would be no appropriate $\Delta x$ for $\kappa'$ = 0.83
    107 (a parameter used in [2]).
     106seem then that there is no appropriate $\Delta x$ for $\kappa'$ = 0.83
     107(a parameter used in [2]) satisfying conservation of volume.
    108108
    109109We've reproduced Figure 2 in [2]
     
    144144by |$\eta_{\rm min}$|?
    145145
    146 Our next question is whether it was appropriate to substitute
     146Our final question is whether it is appropriate to substitute
    147147the formulation for $x_g$ into the surface elevation function using
    148148$x_0 - \Delta x \approx x_g$.
    149149($x_g$ is formulated
    150 as $x_g = d/\tan \theta + T/ \sin \theta$ (described as a gauge
     150as $x_g = d/\tan \theta + T/ \sin \theta$ which is described as a gauge
    151151located above the submarine mass failure
    152 initial submergence location in [3]).) In this
     152initial submergence location in [3].) In this
    153153way, $\kappa'$ as described above would not
    154154be dependent on $\Delta x$, nor the subsequent surface elevation function.
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.