Changeset 3004
- Timestamp:
- May 29, 2006, 12:48:22 PM (19 years ago)
- Location:
- production/onslow_2006/report
- Files:
-
- 4 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex
r2983 r3004 9 9 boundary of the study area is placed approximately around the 100m contour 10 10 line. 11 The resultant computational mesh is then seen in \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}.11 The resultant computational mesh is then seen in figure \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}. 12 12 13 13 \begin{figure}[hbt] … … 44 44 those regions where complex behaviour will occur, such as the inter-tidal 45 45 zone and estuaries. 46 47 The following subsections detail the time series at select locations48 for high, low and zero tide conditions. These locations have49 been chosen to assist in describing the features of the tsunami wave50 and the resultant impact ashore. It is evident from \ref{fig:ic_high}51 that the DEM ...52 53 \begin{figure}[hbt]54 55 %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}}56 57 \caption{Initial condition for mean sea level.}58 \label{fig:ic_zero}59 \end{figure}60 61 \begin{figure}[hbt]62 63 %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}}64 65 \caption{Initial condition for lowest astronomical tide.}66 \label{fig:ic_low}67 \end{figure}68 69 \begin{figure}[hbt]70 71 %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/.png}}72 73 \caption{Initial condition for highest astronomical tide.}74 \label{fig:ic_high}75 \end{figure}76 77 78 What are the features of the tsunami wave?79 direction? multiple waves? amplitude offshore?80 81 It is evident for each simulation that the sand dunes west of Onslow82 are very effective in halting the tsunami wave. The height of these83 sand dunes are approximately 10m which is more than enough to halt84 the largest of the tsunami waves which occurs for the85 high tide simulation. There is inundation between the sand dunes at high86 tide, however, this water penetrated from the north east (via87 Onslow town cetnre) rather than seaward.88 The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow which89 rise to 15m in height. Currently, ANUGA can not model changes90 to the bathymetry or topography due to effects of the water flow.91 Therefore, we do not know whether these sand dunes would withstand the92 transmitted energy of the tsunami wave.93 94 The wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with increasingly95 greater inundation as the tide changes from LAT to HAT.96 97 As expected, there is greater inundation at high tide. The major road98 into Onslow, the Onslow Mount Stuart Rd, remains free of inundation for99 all tidal scenarios. Beadon Creek Rd which services the wharf in the100 river becomes increasingly inundated as the tide rises. Only the101 entry to the wharf on Beadon Creek Rd is sufficiently inundated at LAT102 to stop traffic. At HAT however, essentially the entire road103 would be impassable.104 105 There is significant inundation of at106 least 2m on the foreshore of Onslow for zero and high tide.107 The inundation extent increases as the tide rises, pushing the edges108 of the majority of the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre. -
production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex
r2974 r3004 18 18 Impact on indigeneous communities are important considerations when determining 19 19 tsunami impact, especially as a number of communities exist in coastal regions. 20 These communities are typcially not included in national residential databases and21 would be therefore overlooked in damage model estimates.20 These communities are typcially not included in national residential databases 21 and would be therefore overlooked in damage model estimates. 22 22 There is one indigeneous community located in this study area as seen 23 in \ref{fig:communities}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140 and is 24 situated in a potentially vulnerable location. 23 in figure 24 \ref{fig:communities}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140 25 and is situated in a potentially vulnerable location. 25 26 26 27 \begin{figure}[hbt] -
production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex
r2997 r3004 1 The following subsections detail the time series at select locations 1 %\clearpage 2 The following subsections detail the time series at the locations 3 described in the previous table 4 %table \ref{table:gaugelocations} 2 5 for Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT), Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) and 3 6 Mean Sea Level (MSL) conditions. These locations … … 11 14 simulations. 12 15 16 \begin{table} 17 \label{table:speed_examples} 18 \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.} 13 19 \begin{center} 14 \begin{tabular}{| c|c|}\hline20 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline 15 21 Velocity (m/s) & Example \\ \hline 16 1 & \\ \hline 17 2 & \\ \hline 18 5 & \\ \hline 19 10 & \\ \hline 22 1 & leisurely stroll pace\\ \hline 23 1.5 & average walking pace \\ \hline 24 2 & 100m Olympic male freestyle \\ \hline 25 3 & mackeral \\ \hline 26 4 & average person maintain for 1000m \\ \hline 27 5 & blue whale \\ \hline 28 10 & 100m Olympic male sprinter \\ \hline 29 16 & car travelling in urban zones (60 km/hr) \\ \hline 20 30 \end{tabular} 21 31 \end{center} 32 \end{table} 22 33 23 34 In simulating different tidal conditions, we assume that the … … 39 50 Onslow map? If so, does that place AHD 0 at MHWS? 40 51 41 It is evident from \ref{fig:ic_high}52 It is evident from figure \ref{fig:ic_high} 42 53 that much of Onslow would be inundated at Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) 43 54 (1.5m above MSL). … … 53 64 provide a 54 65 qualitative discussion on the changes to the inundation at HAT and LAT. 55 56 %Depending on what the following figures look like, we may need to use the57 %other data rather than the DTED.58 66 59 67 \begin{figure}[hbt] … … 108 116 event propagate towards the shore. 109 117 110 111 118 %At some gauge locations, these 112 119 %subsequent waves cause significantly increased inundation than that of … … 114 121 %West of Groyne and Beadon Creek locations. 115 122 116 117 (\bf{Note, these words are assuming that the current simulations are OK, 123 ({\bf Note, these words are assuming that the current simulations are OK, 118 124 and will have to be updated once we have more information about 119 125 the tides etc}). -
production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex
r2983 r3004 62 62 \label{sec:results} 63 63 \input{computational_setup} 64 65 \begin{table} 66 \label{table:gaugelocations} 67 \caption{Defined gauge locations for Onslow study area.} 64 68 65 69 \begin{center} … … 80 84 Beadon Bay west & 305311.01 & 7606557.16 \\ \hline 81 85 Beadon Bay east & 307989.36 & 7606591.95 \\ \hline 82 \end{tabular} 83 \end{center} 84 86 87 \end{tabular} 88 \end{center} 89 \end{table} 90 85 91 \input{interpretation} 86 92 \subsection{Lowest Astronomical Tide} … … 102 108 103 109 \section{Damage modelling} 110 \label{sec:damage} 104 111 \input{damage} 105 112 \subsection{Lowest Astronomical Tide}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.