Changeset 3079

Timestamp:

Jun 5, 2006, 2:56:24 PM (19 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

small updates

Location:

production/onslow_2006/report

Files:

• anuga.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• computational_setup.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• damage.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• data.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• interpretation.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• onslow_2006_report.tex (modified) (2 diffs)

production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex

@@ -21 +21 @@
 \item initial condition (e.g. determined by tides)
 \item boundary condition (the tsunami source as described in 
-Section \ref{sec:tsunami_scenario})
+Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario})
 \item forcing terms (such as wind)
 \item definition of a mesh parameter values

production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

@@ -17 +17 @@
              {../report_figures/onslow_data_poly.png}}
 
-  \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario highlighting areas of increased refinement.
-The underlying data is as in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_data_area}.}
+  \caption{Study area for Onslow scenario highlighting areas of increased 
+refinement.
+The underlying data is as in Figure \ref{fig:onslowdataarea}.}
   \label{fig:onslow_area}
 \end{figure}
 
-For the simulations, we have chosen a cell area of 500 m$^2$ per triangle for the 
-region surrounding the Onslow town centre. It is worth noting here that the cell 
-area will be the maximum cell area within the defined region and that each cell in
+For the simulations, we have chosen a cell area of 500 m$^2$ per triangle 
+for the 
+region surrounding the Onslow town centre. It is worth noting here that 
+the cell 
+area will be the maximum cell area within the defined region and that each 
+cell in
 the region does not necessarily have the same area. The cell area is increased 
 to 2500 m$^2$ for the region surrounding the coast and further increased
@@ -36 +40 @@
 for these cell areas is approximatly 30m, 70m, 200m and 445m for the respective
 areas. This means
-that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation extent to approximately
-30m lateral accuracy within the Onslow town centre. 
+that we can only be confident in the calculated inundation extent to 
+approximately 30m lateral accuracy within the Onslow town centre. 
 Referring to the discussion in Section \ref{sec:anuga}, it is important 
 to refine the mesh to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in 

production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex

@@ -32 +32 @@
 There is one indigeneous community located in this study area as seen
 in Figure
-\ref{fig:gauges}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140 
+\ref{fig:points}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140 
 and is situated in a potentially vulnerable location.
 

production/onslow_2006/report/data.tex

@@ -47 +47 @@
 The extent of the
 data used for the tsunami impact modelling can be seen in the
-Figure \ref{onslow_data_area}. The study area covers approximately 100km of coastline
+Figure \ref{fig:onslowdataarea}. The study area covers approximately 100km 
+of coastline
 and extends offshore to the 100m contour line and inshore to approximately 10m
 elevation.
@@ -53 +54 @@
 \begin{figure}[hbt]
 
-  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]{../report_figures/onslow_data_extent.png}}
+  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
+{../report_figures/onslow_data_extent.png}}
 
-  \caption{Data extent for Onslow scenario. Offshore data shown in blue and onshore data
-in green.}
-  \label{fig:onslow_data_area}
+  \caption{Data extent for Onslow scenario. Offshore data shown in blue 
+and onshore data in green.}
+  \label{fig:onslowdataarea}
 \end{figure}
 

production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex

@@ -5 +5 @@
 in an emergency situation, such as the hospital and power station, or
 effect recovery efforts, such as the airport and docks. These locations
-are described in table \ref{table:gaugelocations} and shown in 
-Figure \ref{fig:gauges}. The supporting graphs are shown in
+are described in table \ref{table:locations} and shown in 
+Figure \ref{fig:points}. The supporting graphs are shown in
 Section \ref{sec:timeseries} which show how the stage and speed
 vary with time at a particular location. Stage is
@@ -70 +70 @@
 It is evident for each simulation that the sand dunes west of 
 Onslow are very effective in halting the tsunami wave,
-see Figures \ref{fig:HAT_map}, \ref{fig:MSL_map} and
-\ref{fig:LAT_map}. The height of these
+see Figures \ref{fig:HAT_max_inundation}, \ref{fig:MSL_max_inundation} and
+\ref{fig:LAT_max_inundation}. The height of these
 sand dunes are approximately 10m which is more than enough to halt
 the largest of the tsunami waves which occurs for the
 1.5 AHD simulation. There is inundation between the sand dunes at high 
-tide, Figure \ref{fig:HAT_map}, however, this water 
+tide, Figure \ref{fig:HAT_max_inundation}, however, this water 
 penetrated from the north east (via
 Onslow town centre) rather than seaward.

production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex

@@ -52 +52 @@
    
   \section{Tsunami scenarios}
-    \label{sec:tsunami_scenarios}
+    \label{sec:tsunamiscenario}
     \input{tsunami_scenario}
 
@@ -106 +106 @@
  
 
-   \section{Damage modelling}
+  \section{Damage modelling}
+   \label{sec:damage}
      \input{damage}
+
 \input{MSL_damage} 
  \clearpage