Changeset 3157


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 15, 2006, 12:49:20 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

minor textual updates

Location:
production/onslow_2006/report
Files:
3 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex

    r3156 r3157  
    6363\end{figure}
    6464
     65
    6566It is important
    6667to refine the model areas to be commensurate with the underlying data especially in
     
    7374used a
    7475grid resolution which can adequately model tsunamis with a
    75 wavelength of 50km. In completing the model setup, we have not incorporated
    76 bottom friction in the scenarios presented in this report. Bottom friction
    77 can be accommodation in ANUGA as a forcing term, however, it is an
     76wavelength of 50km. Bottom friction has not been incorporated
     77in the scenarios presented in this report. It
     78can be accommodated in ANUGA as a forcing term, however, it is an
    7879open area of research on how to determine the friction coefficients.
    7980Therefore, the results presented are overly compensated to some degree.
    8081
    8182
     83
  • production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3079 r3157  
    6666\end{figure}
    6767
     68To complete the model setup, we describe the form of the
     69tsunami wave from the earthquake source described
     70in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}. The Method of Splitting Tsunami (MOST)
     71was used to initiate the event and propagate the wave in deep water. The
     72waves amplitude and velocity is then determined at the
     73boundary of the study area (see Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area}) whereupon
     74ANUGA continues to propagate the tsunami wave in shallow water and onshore.
     75To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we select a number
     76of point locations outside, on and within the boundary (shown in
     77Figure \ref{fig:boundarypoints}) and show the moving
     78wave amplitude and speed.
    6879
     80\begin{figure}[hbt]
    6981
     82%  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
     83%              {../report_figures/mesh.jpg}}
     84
     85  \caption{Point locations used to illustrate form of tsunami wave.}
     86  \label{fig:boundarypoints}
     87\end{figure}
     88
     89%\input{latexoutput_MOST}
     90
     91{\bf run compare\_timeseries.py for some boundary gauges to show
     92what the source provides to the boundary for this study.}
     93
  • production/onslow_2006/report/tsunami_scenario.tex

    r3078 r3157  
    2525the coast of Java. It is this event which provides the source and
    2626boundary condition to the
    27 inundation modelling presented in this report.
     27inundation modelling presented in this report. Description of the boundary
     28condition particular to the Onslow study area
     29follows in Section \ref{sec:anuga}.
    2830
    2931
     
    3739  \label{fig:mw9}
    3840\end{figure}
    39 
    40 {\bf run runtimeseries.py for some boundary gauges to show
    41 what the source provides to teh boundary for this study.}
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.