Changeset 3189

Timestamp:

Jun 20, 2006, 6:00:07 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

updates to working document

File:

• documentation/experimentation/boundary_ANUGA_MOST/report/MOST_ANUGA.tex (modified) (3 diffs)

documentation/experimentation/boundary_ANUGA_MOST/report/MOST_ANUGA.tex

@@ -174 +174 @@
 \label{sec:mostanugaonslow}
 
+Before considering any comparison, we will investigate how the maximum
+amplitude varies as the tsunami wave reaches the shore. The theory
+says that the amplitude will grow and the velocity decrease to zero.
+
+have a plot here that has the bed elevation on the x-axis and the 
+maximum amplitude on the y-axis
+
+have a plot here that has the bed elevation on the x-axis and the 
+maximum amplitude on the y-axis
+
 We want to compare MOST and ANUGA all the way to the shore - as
 close as practical anyway. It is important to note here
-that MOST and ANUGA are using different bathymetry data sets. MOST
-typically uses a much coarser grid than ANUGA. We interpolate
-both MOST and ANUGA output onto the defined point locations.
-
-\begin{figure}
-\caption{Diagram of MOST grid layout, ANUGA boundary and gauge 
-locatations.}
-\label{fig:setuponslow}
-\end{figure}
+that MOST and ANUGA are using different bathymetry data sets, with MOST
+typically using a much coarser grid than ANUGA. We interpolate
+both MOST and ANUGA output onto the defined point locations. Due to the
+fact that ANUGA is utilising a finer resolution bathymetry set, 
+we will expect to see richer detail in the ANUGA output. 
+
+\input{comparison_onslow}
 
 The table should show us where it is appropriate to place
@@ -199 +207 @@
 \end{tabular}
 \end{table}
+
+or perhaps ditch the table and repeat the graphs above
+with both ANUGA and MOST
 
 \subsubsection{ANUGA comparison - 50m and 100m contour}
@@ -215 +226 @@
 see for example the output for the Ocean polygon 1 and 2 locations.
 
-\input{comparison_onslow}
 
 It is more instructive in this case to compare differences in