Changeset 3201

Timestamp:

Jun 22, 2006, 2:00:23 PM (17 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

onslow report updates

Location:

production/onslow_2006

Files:

• make_report.py (modified) (2 diffs)
• report/computational_setup.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• report/damage.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• report/damage_inputs.tex (added)
• report/references.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• report_figures/point_line_3d.png (added)
• report_figures/solution_surfaceMOST.png (added)

production/onslow_2006/make_report.py

@@ -258 +258 @@
      \input{summary}
      
-   \section{References}
     \input{references}
     
@@ -267 +266 @@
    \section{Time series}
      \label{sec:timeseries}
+     
+   \section{Damage modelling inputs}
+     \label{sec:damageinputs}
+     \input{damage_inputs}
 """
 fid.write(s)

production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

@@ -86 +86 @@
 the boundary (the 100m contour line as shown in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area})
 and continues to propagate the wave in shallow water and onshore. 
-To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we select a number
-of point locations surrouding the boundary (shown in 
-Figure \ref{fig:boundarypoints}) and show the waves movement in terms
-of water level and speed. 
+To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we show the form
+of the tsunami wave moving through the point locations 
+shown in \ref{fig:pointline3d}. This time history is
+shown as a surface in Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}.
+
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+
+  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
+              {../report_figures/point_line_3d.png}}
+
+  \caption{Point locations used to show form of tsunami wave.}
+  \label{fig:pointline3d}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+
+  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=100mm, height=75mm]
+              {../report_figures/solution_surfaceMOST.png}}
+
+  \caption{Time history of tsunami wave.}
+  \label{fig:MOSTsolution}
+\end{figure}
 
 
-
-

production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex

@@ -31 +31 @@
 \ref{fig:gaugeBindiBindiCommunity}) indicating 100\% damage of contents.
 
-Once the maximum inundation is calculated for each building, the resultant 
-damage 
-can be determined as a function of its type and location from the 
-coastline, \cite{ken:damage}. The damage to the residential
-structures in the Onslow community
+To develop building damage and casuality estimates, we briefly describe 
+residential collapse probability models and casualty models and their 
+application to inundation modelling.
+
+
+There is a paucity of data on the tsunami vulnerability of buildings. 
+With reference to the limited data found in the international literature, 
+along with reported observations made of building performance during the 
+recent Indian Ocean tsunami, vulnerability models have been proposed for 
+framed residential construction. The models predict the collapse 
+probability for an exposed population and incorporate the following 
+parameters known to influence building damage \cite{papathoma:vulnerability}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item   Inundation Depth at Building    
+\item   Building Row From Coast 
+\item   Building Material (residential framed construction)     
+\item   Inundation Depth at House Above Floor Level
+\end{itemize}   
+
+The collapse vulnerability models used are presented in \ref{table:collapse}. 
+In applying the model all structures in the inundation zone were 
+spatially located and the local water depth and building row 
+number from the exposed edge of the suburb were determined for each.
+
+Casualty models were developed by making reference to the 
+storm surge models used for the Cairns Cyclone Scenario and 
+through consultation with Dr David Cooper of NSW Health, \cite{cooper:2005}. 
+The injury probabilities for exposed populations were selected 
+based on the nocturnal nature of the event, the collapse outcome 
+for the structure, the water depth with respect to 
+sleeping height (1.0 m) and the limited warning noise for people 
+in the first three city blocks (6 house rows) that could potentially 
+awaken them. The three injury categories corresponded with the 
+categories presented in HAZUS-MH \cite{NIBS:2003} for earthquake 
+related injury. The casualty model used is presented in 
+\ref{table:casualty} 
+and the injury categories are presented in \ref{table:injury}. 
+Input data comprised resident population data at CD level derived 
+from the ABS 2001 census.
+
+The damage to the residential structures in the Onslow community
 is summarised in Table \ref{table:damageoutput}. The percentage
 of repair cost to structural value shown is based on the total structural value

production/onslow_2006/report/references.tex

@@ -21 +21 @@
 URL: http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/nielsen.pdf
 
-\bibitem{ken:damage} Dale, K. (year)
+\bibitem{papathoma:vulnerability} 
+Papathoma, M. and Dominey-Howes, D. (2003) 
+Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard 
+analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece, 
+Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 3, 733-747.
+
+\bibitem{cooper:2005}
+Cooper, D. (2005) Personal Communication at NSW Tsunami Workshop 12th and 
+13th April, Masonic Centre, Goulburn St, Sydney.
+
+\bibitem{NIBS:2003} National Institute of Building Sciences (2003) 
+HAZUS-MH User Manual, Washington DC, USA.
 
 \end{thebibliography}