Changeset 3235


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 26, 2006, 3:39:12 PM (19 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

yet more updates

Location:
production/onslow_2006/report
Files:
7 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex

    r3232 r3235  
    3838in the scenario presented in this report. Therefore, the
    3939results presented are over estimated to some degree.
     40
  • production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3232 r3235  
    4141In addition, the data is not necessarily complete, as can be
    4242seen in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area}.
     43
    4344In the deep water modelling such as MOST,
    4445the minimum model resolution is chosen so that there at
     
    8788and continues to propagate the wave in shallow water and onshore.
    8889To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we show the
    89 tsunami wave moving through the point locations
    90 (Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}(a)). This time history is
    91 shown as a surface in Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}(b).
     90tsunami wave moving through the point locations shown in
     91Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution} as a surface showing the wave's
     92amplitude as a function of its spatial location and time.
    9293
    9394
     
    9899\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth, height=50mm]{../report_figures/solution_surfaceMOST.png}\\
    99100\end{tabular}
    100  \caption{(1) Point locations used to illustrate form of tsunami wave.
    101 (2) Time hisorty of tsunami wave)}
     101 \caption{Point locations used to illustrate the form of the tsunami wave and the
     102corresponding surface function.}
    102103 \label{fig:MOSTsolution}
    103104 \end{figure}
  • production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex

    r3232 r3235  
    1919housing survey}.
    2020
    21 Impact on indigeneous communities are important considerations when determining
    22 tsunami impact, especially as a number of communities exist in coastal regions.
    23 These communities are typically not included in national residential databases
    24 and would be therefore overlooked in damage model estimates.
    25 There is one indigeneous community located in this study area as seen
    26 in Figure
    27 \ref{fig:points}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140
    28 and is situated close to the coast as seen in Figure \ref{fig:points}.
    29 At 0m AHD, over 2m of water will inundate parts of the community (Figure
    30 \ref{fig:fig:20060515001733gaugeBindiBindiCommunity})
    31 indicating 100\% damage of contents.
    3221
    3322To develop building damage and casuality estimates, we briefly describe
     
    6049for the structure, the water depth with respect to
    6150sleeping height (1.0 m) and the limited warning noise for people
    62 in the first three city blocks (6 house rows) that could potentially
     51in the first three city blocks (six house rows) that could potentially
    6352awaken them. The three injury categories corresponded with the
    6453categories presented in HAZUS-MH \cite{NIBS:2003} for earthquake
     
    112101\end{table}
    113102
    114 discussion on Mary's outputs
    115103
     104Impact on indigeneous communities are important considerations when determining
     105tsunami impact, especially as a number of communities exist in coastal regions.
     106These communities are typically not included in national residential databases
     107and would be therefore overlooked in damage model estimates.
     108There is one indigeneous community located in this study area as seen
     109in Figure
     110\ref{fig:points}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140
     111and is situated close to the coast as seen in Figure \ref{fig:points}.
     112At 0m AHD, over 2m of water will inundate parts of the community (Figure
     113\ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBindiBindiCommunity})
     114indicating 100\% damage of contents.
  • production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex

    r3233 r3235  
    22As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the
    33extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts
    4 from the event. Onslow is termed a Standard Port
    5 by the Australian Hydrographic Service, with tidal
    6 predictions based on continuous observation of the tide
    7 over a period of at least one year, however it is advised that these
    8 observations extend to three years to note changes in the mean
    9 sea level. The Australian National Tide Tables 2006 \cite{antt:06}
    10 describes how
    11 these predictions are rounded to two decimal places, then
    12 further rounded to a single decimal place.
     4from the event. The Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest
     5Astronomical Tide (LAT) are defined as 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD
     6respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}. These values are tidal
     7predictions based on continous tidal observations from Standard Ports
     8over a period of
     9at least one year, with the Australian Hydrographic Service
     10recommending this be extended to three years to capture
     11changes to the mean sea level. Onslow is listed as
     12a Standard Port. These predictions are ultimately rounded on a single
     13decimal place.
     14
    1315Figure \ref{fig:contours} shows the contour lines for
    14 the values for
    15 Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT; 1.5m AHD), Mean Sea Level (MSL; 0m AHD)
    16 and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT; -1.5m AHD) for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}.
     16the HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow.
    1717It is evident from this figure that the extent of the tidal
    18 inundation is exaggerated. This is due to
    19 short comings with the digital elevation model which has been
     18inundation is exaggerated which is due to
     19short comings with the digital elevation model (DEM). The DEM has been
    2020derived from 20m contour lines. {\bf Need some words from hamish here.}
    2121
  • production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex

    r3219 r3235  
    4747(Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonCreekmouth}), for example.
    4848The first wave
    49 after the drawdown ranges from approximatly 2m in the
     49after the drawdown ranges from approximately 2m in the
    5050west of Beadon Bay (Figure \ref{fig:20060515001733gaugeBeadonBaywest})
    5151to 1.5m in the east of Beadon Bay
  • production/onslow_2006/report/modelling_methodology.tex

    r3232 r3235  
    2323of hundreds of metres, which is sufficient to model long wavelength tsunami waves.
    2424Non-linear models by contrast require much finer resolution in order to capture
    25 the complexity associated the water flow from off to onshore. The data
    26 resolution is typically of the order of tens of metres.
     25the complexity associated with the water flow from off to onshore. By contrast, the data
     26resolution required is typically of the order of tens of metres.
    2727The model ANUGA (\cite{ON:modsim}) is suitable for this type of non-linear
    2828modelling.
  • production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex

    r3136 r3235  
    11
    2 Further modelling effort is required in the next financial year to
    3 investigate the solution sensitivity to cell resolution,
    4 bathymetry and tsunami source uncertainties.
    5 Further investigation of the point at which
    6 ANUGA can use the deep water model output is also required as well
    7 as incorporating appropriate friction coefficients.s
     2This report has described the impact to Onslow from a Mw 9 earthquake
     3generated from the Sunda Arc subduction zone occurring at
     4Mean Sea Level.
     5There is no knowledge of the return period for this event.
     6As discussed in Section \ref{sec:discussion}, there are issues
     7with the underlying data set which may have vertical inaccuracies
     8of approximately 1-2m. As a result, these results should be considered
     9preliminary.
     10These scenarios will be revisited once the probabilistic models
     11are complete so that a suite of tsunami impact assessments can be made.
     12It is therefore imperative that suitably accurate onshore data
     13be made available to raise confidence in the impact assessments.
     14
     15Future activities to support the impact studies on the North West Shelf
     16include:
     17
     18\begin{itemize}
     19\item Sourcing of data sets
     20\item Investigation of solution sensitivity to cell resolution,
     21bathymetry and tsunami source uncertainties
     22\item Location of boundary for simulation study area
     23\item Investigation of friction coefficients
     24\end{itemize}
     25
     26
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.