Changeset 3238

Timestamp:

Jun 26, 2006, 4:38:55 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

references

Location:

production/onslow_2006

Files:

• make_report.py (modified) (1 diff)
• report/modelling_methodology.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• report/references.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• report/summary.tex (modified) (1 diff)

production/onslow_2006/make_report.py

@@ -271 +271 @@
    \section{Issues}
      \input{discussion}
+     \label{issues}
 
      \section{Summary}

production/onslow_2006/report/modelling_methodology.tex

@@ -7 +7 @@
 The maximal wave height at a fixed contour line near the coastline
 (e.g.\ 50m) is then reported as the hazard to communities ashore. 
-Models such as Method of Splitting Tsunamis (MOST) \cite{VT:MOST} and 
-``URS model'' \cite{xxx} follow this paradigm.
+Models such as Method of Splitting Tsunamis (MOST) \cite{VT:MOST} and the 
+URS Corporation's
+Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis  
+\cite{somerville:urs} follow this paradigm.
 
 To capture the \emph{impact} of a hydrological disaster such as tsunamis on a 

production/onslow_2006/report/references.tex

@@ -8 +8 @@
 Tsunami (MOST) model, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-112.
 
-\bibitem{person:urs} get from DB
+\bibitem{somerville:urs} Somerville, P., Thio, H.K. and Ichinose, G. (2005)
+Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Report delivered to Geoscience
+Australia 2005.
 
 \bibitem{matsuyama:1999}

production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex

@@ -4 +4 @@
 Mean Sea Level. 
 There is no knowledge of the return period for this event. 
-As discussed in Section \ref{sec:discussion}, there are issues
+As discussed in Section \ref{sec:issues}, there are issues
 with the underlying data set which may have vertical inaccuracies
 of approximately 1-2m. As a result, these results should be considered