Index: production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex
===================================================================
--- production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex	(revision 3237)
+++ production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex	(revision 3240)
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 In this report, impact modelling refers to damage as a result
 of the inundation described in Section \ref{sec:results}. This damage
-is reported as to damage to infrastructure as well as
-number of human injuries. The infrastructure
+is reported as damage to infrastructure as well as
+number of human injuries and is determined assuming
+that the event occurs at night. The infrastructure
 refers to residential structures only and is sourced from the 
 the National Building Exposure Database (NBED). The NBED has been
@@ -22,7 +23,8 @@
 To develop building damage and casuality estimates, we briefly describe 
 residential collapse probability models and casualty models and their 
-application to inundation modelling.
-With limited data found in the international literature, 
-along with reported observations made of building performance during the 
+application to inundation modelling. There is limited data found in
+the international literature to support to the development of
+vulnerability models. However,
+with reported observations made of building performance during the 
 recent Indian Ocean tsunami, vulnerability models have been proposed for 
 framed residential construction. The models predict the collapse 
@@ -50,11 +52,11 @@
 sleeping height (1.0 m) and the limited warning noise for people 
 in the first three city blocks (six house rows) that could potentially 
-awaken them. The three injury categories corresponded with the 
+awaken them. The three injury categories correspond with the 
 categories presented in HAZUS-MH \cite{NIBS:2003} for earthquake 
 related injury. The casualty model used is presented in Table
 \ref{table:casualty} 
 and the injury categories are presented in Table \ref{table:injury}. 
-Input data comprised resident population data at CD level derived 
-from the ABS 2001 census.
+Input data comprised of resident population data at census
+district level derived from the ABS 2001 census.
 
 The damage to the residential structures in the Onslow community
@@ -73,14 +75,11 @@
 \begin{table}[h]
 \label{table:damageoutput}
-%\caption{Residential damage sustained for 1.5m, 0m and -1.5m AHD scenarios.}
 \caption{Residential damage sustained for the 0m AHD scenario.}
 \begin{center}
-\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
-& Houses  & Houses  & Structural & Repair Cost \% & Contents & Contents Loss \% \\ 
-& Inundation & Collapsed & Repair Cost 
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+Houses  & Houses  & Structural & Repair Cost \% & Contents & Contents Loss \% \\ 
+Inundation & Collapsed & Repair Cost 
 & of Total Value & Losses & of Total Value \\ \hline
-%1.5m AHD & 90 & 14 & \$10,951,887 & 18.2 \% & \$24,020,309 & 28.12 \%\\ \hline
-0m AHD & 54 & 1 & \$5,317,783 &  8.8 \% & \$11,592,602 & 13.6 \% \\ \hline
-%-1.5m AHD & 0 & 0 & 0& 0& 0&  0\\ \hline
+54 & 1 & \$5,317,783 &  8.8 \% & \$11,592,602 & 13.6 \% \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
@@ -89,16 +88,12 @@
 \begin{table}[h]
 \label{table:injuries}
-%\caption{Injuries sustained for 1.5m, 0m and -1.5m AHD scenarios.}
 \caption{Injuries sustained for the 0m AHD scenario.}
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
- & Minor & Moderate & Serious & Fatal \\ \hline
-%1.5m AHD & 59 & 17 & 8 & 83 \\ \hline
-0m AHD & 43 & 11 & 6 & 20 \\ \hline
-%-1.5m AHD & 0 & 0 & 0 & \\ \hline
+Minor & Moderate & Serious & Fatal \\ \hline
+43 & 11 & 6 & 20 \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 \end{table}
-
 
 Impact on indigeneous communities are important considerations when determining
@@ -109,4 +104,5 @@
 in Figure
 \ref{fig:points}. The population of the Bindibindi community is 140 
+(18 \% of the Onslow population)
 and is situated close to the coast as seen in Figure \ref{fig:points}.
 At 0m AHD, over 2m of water will inundate parts of the community (Figure 
