Changeset 3326

Timestamp:

Jul 13, 2006, 11:26:43 AM (19 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

more changes

Location:

production/onslow_2006

Files:

• make_report.py (modified) (1 diff)
• report/discussion.tex (modified) (4 diffs)

production/onslow_2006/make_report.py

@@ -282 +282 @@
     \input{references}
 
-    \appendix
+    \\appendix
     
    \section{Metadata}

production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex

@@ -20 +20 @@
 ``bare earth'', whereas the DLI data is distorted by 
 vegetation and buildings.
-Figure \ref{fig:contours_dted} shows the contour lines for
+Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare} shows the contour lines for
 HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the DTED data where it is evident 
 that the extent of the tidal inundation is exaggerated. This is due to
@@ -27 +27 @@
 derived from 20m contour lines. {\bf Need some words from hamish here.}
 As a result, we turned to the WA DLI onshore data to present
-the results in this report. Figure \ref{fig:contours_dli} shows
+the results in this report. Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare} shows
 the contour lines for HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the WA DLI data.
 It is obvious that there are significant differences in each DEM with
@@ -39 +39 @@
 {../report_figures/onslow_dted_contour.jpg}}
 
-  \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)
- and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the DTED Level 2 data.}
-  \label{fig:contours_dted}
-\end{figure}
+ % \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)
+ %and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the DTED Level 2 data.}
+ % \label{fig:contours_dted}
+%\end{figure}
 
-\begin{figure}[hbt]
+%\begin{figure}[hbt]
 
   \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
@@ -50 +50 @@
 
   \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 
-and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the WA DLI data.}
-  \label{fig:contours_dli}
+and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the DTED Level 2 data and
+the WA DLI data.}
+ % \label{fig:contours_dli}
+ \label{fig:contours_compare}
 \end{figure}
 
 The purpose of this section then is to
 show the differences to the impact ashore when each data set is used
-to demonstrate the importance of using the best possible data set. As
-before, we show the time history of the water's stage and velocity for the
+to demonstrate the importance of using the best possible data set. The
+maximum inundation map is shown for MSL in Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map_DTED}
+which can be compared with the equivalent map for the WA DLI data,
+Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map}.
+Additionaly, we show
+the time history of the water's stage and velocity for the
 point locations in Table \ref{table:locations} for both the DTED and 
 DLI data at MSL. 
 These results are shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseriescompare}.
 
+\begin{figure}[hbt]
+
+  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
+{../report_figures/mid_tide_DTED.jpg}}
+
+  \caption{Maximum inundation map for the Onslow region using
+  the DTED data.}
+  \label{fig:MSL_map_DTED}
+\end{figure}