Changeset 3341
- Timestamp:
- Jul 17, 2006, 6:59:51 PM (19 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex
r3340 r3341 2 2 determined. Preliminary investigations have indicated that point 3 3 at which the deep water and shallow water models can exchange data is 4 sufficiently OK at the 5 100m bathymetric contour line. 6 Current computation requirements define a coastline 7 extent of around 100km. 4 sufficient at the 100m bathymetric contour line\footnote{ 8 5 Preliminary investigations indicate that MOST and ANUGA compare 9 6 well at the 100m contour line. In addition, the resolution for … … 12 9 the tsunami wave at the boundary is approximately 20km. A much 13 10 higher model resolution will be used in developing the probabilistic 14 models for further studies. 15 Therefore, the study area cof around 6300 km$^2$ 11 models for further studies.}. Historical runup heights are 12 of the order of 10m and we would expect that a tsunami wave 13 would penetrate no higher for this scenario. 14 Current computation requirements define a coastline 15 extent of around 100km. Therefore, the study area of around 6300 km$^2$ 16 16 covers approximately 100km of 17 17 coastline and extends offshore to the 100m contour line and inshore to … … 19 19 20 20 To initiate the modelling, a triangular mesh is constructed to 21 cover the study region 22 The cell size is chosen to balance 21 cover the study region. Each triangular cell is defined a cell area 22 which is chosen to balance 23 23 computational time and desired resolution in areas of interest, 24 particularly in the interface between the onand offshore.24 particularly in the interface between onshore and offshore. 25 25 Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area} illustrates the data extent for the 26 26 scenario, the study area and where further mesh refinement has been made. … … 85 85 \end{figure} 86 86 87 To complete the model setup, we illustrate the 88 tsunami wave from the earthquake source described 89 in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario} which is used as the boundary condition, 90 as described in Section \ref{sec:methodology}. 91 MOST was used to initiate the event and propagate the wave in deep water. 92 ANUGA uses the MOST wave amplitude and velocity at 93 the boundary (the 100m contour line as shown in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area}) 94 and continues to propagate the wave in shallow water and onshore. 95 To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we show the 96 tsunami wave moving through the point locations shown in 97 Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution} as a surface showing the wave's 98 amplitude as a function of its spatial location and time. 99 This figure shows how the wave has been affected by the bathymetry in 100 arriving at these locations as the amplitude is variable. It is also 101 important to note that the tsunami is made up of a series of 102 waves with different amplitudes. 87 The final item to be addressed to complete the model setup is to 88 define the boundary condition. As 89 discussed in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}, a Mw 9 event provides 90 the tsunami source. The resultant tsunami wave is made up of a series 91 of waves with different amplitudes which is affected by the energy 92 and style of the event as well as the bathymetry whilst it travels 93 from its source to Onslow. The amplitude and velocity of each of these 94 waves are then provided to ANUGA as boundary conditions and propagated 95 inshore. 96 %To complete the model setup, we illustrate the 97 %tsunami wave from the earthquake source described 98 %in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario} which is used as the boundary condition, 99 %as described in Section \ref{sec:methodology}. 100 %MOST was used to initiate the event and propagate the wave in deep water. 101 %ANUGA uses the MOST wave amplitude and velocity at 102 %the boundary (the 100m contour line as shown in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area}) 103 %and continues to propagate the wave in shallow water and onshore. 104 %To illustrate the form of the tsunami wave, we show the 105 %tsunami wave moving through the point locations shown in 106 %Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution} as a surface showing the wave's 107 %amplitude as a function of its spatial location and time. 108 %This figure shows how the wave has been affected by the bathymetry in 109 %arriving at these locations as the amplitude is variable. It is also 110 %important to note that the tsunami is made up of a series of 111 %waves with different amplitudes. 103 112 104 \begin{figure}[hbt]105 \centering106 \begin{tabular}{cc}107 \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth, height=50mm]{../report_figures/point_line_3d.png}&108 \includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth, height=50mm]{../report_figures/solution_surfaceMOST.png}\\109 (a) & (b) \\110 \end{tabular}111 \caption{Point locations used to illustrate the form of the tsunami wave and the112 corresponding surface function.}113 \label{fig:MOSTsolution}114 \end{figure}113 %\begin{figure}[hbt] 114 % \centering 115 % \begin{tabular}{cc} 116 %\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth, height=50mm]{../report_figures/point_line_3d.png}& 117 %\includegraphics[width=0.49\linewidth, height=50mm]{../report_figures/solution_surfaceMOST.png}\\ 118 %(a) & (b) \\ 119 %\end{tabular} 120 % \caption{Point locations used to illustrate the form of the tsunami wave and the 121 %corresponding surface function.} 122 % \label{fig:MOSTsolution} 123 % \end{figure}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.