Context Navigation

Changeset 3361

Timestamp:

Jul 18, 2006, 6:36:53 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

more stuff

Location:

production/onslow_2006

Files:

-                      r3347
+                      r3361
 * Impact modelling
 * Summary
+* Acknowledgements
 * References
 * Appendix: Metadata
 …
      \section{Summary}
      \input{summary}
+     \section{Acknowledgements}
+     \input{acknowledgements}
     \input{references}

-                      r3360
+                      r3361
 is summarised in Table \ref{table:damageoutput}. The percentage
 of repair cost to structural value shown is based on the total structural value
+of \$60,187,955. Likewise, the percentage of contents loss shown is
+based on the total contents value of \$85,410,060 for
+the Onslow region. The injuries sustained is summarised
+in Table \ref{table:injuries}. The HAT scenario is the only scenario to cause damage
+to Onslow with around \%13 of the population affected.
+of \$60M. Likewise, the percentage of contents loss shown is
+based on the total contents value of \$85M for
+the Onslow region.
+%The injuries sustained is summarised in Table \ref{table:injuries}.
+The HAT scenario is the only scenario to cause damage
+to Onslow with around 10-15\% of the population affected.
 \begin{table}[h]
 …
 & of Total Value & Losses & of Total Value \\ \hline
 %MSL & & 1 & \$ &   \% & \$ &  \% \\ \hline
 HAT 68& 1&\$6 237 263 & &\$12 664 077 & & \\ \hline
+HAT 68& 1&\$6M & &\$13M & & \\ \hline
 %LAT & & & & & & \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}

-                      r3345
+                      r3361
 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and orthophotography
 covering the NW Shelf. The DTED Level 2 data is ``bare earth'' and
+the DLI data distorted by vegetation and buildings. The WA DLI data
+is used for the simulation results, due to its overall
+increased accuracy over the DTED data.
+the DLI data distorted by vegetation and buildings.
 Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare}(a) shows the contour lines for
 …
 that the extent of the tidal inundation is exaggerated. This is due to
 short comings with the digital elevation model (DEM) created from
 the DTED data. The DEM has been
 derived from 20m contour lines. {\bf Need some words from hamish here.} Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare}(b) shows
+the DTED data.
+Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare}(b) shows
 the contour lines for HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the WA DLI data.
 It is obvious that there are significant differences in each DEM with

-                      r3340
+                      r3361
 line is further from the coast for the DTED data than the DLI data, we
 expect the inundation to extend further and thus be greater than
+that seen in Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map}. Further, the impact modelling
+that seen in Figure \ref{fig:MSL_max_inundation}.
+Further, the impact modelling
 will result in inflated structural and contents loss figures as well as
 numbers of people affected.

-                      r3340
+                      r3361
 \end{table}
 Examining the offshore locations shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseries},
 the drawdown prior to the tsunami wave
+Examining the offshore locations shown in Appendix
+\ref{sec:timeseries}, the drawdown prior to the tsunami wave
 arriving at the shore can be seen to occur around 230 mins
 (3.8 hours) after the tsunami is generated.
 …
 location.
 Subsequent drawdowns are seen as the multitude of waves which make up the
 event (see Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}) propagate towards the shore.
+event propagate towards the shore.
 %At some gauge locations, these

-                      r3349
+                      r3361
      \section{Summary}
      \input{summary}
+     \section{Acknowledgements}
+     \input{acknowledgements}
     \input{references}

Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.