Changeset 3365
- Timestamp:
- Jul 19, 2006, 8:40:39 AM (19 years ago)
- Location:
- production/pt_hedland_2006/report
- Files:
-
- 1 added
- 3 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/anuga.tex
r3364 r3365 36 36 as the vertical datum. Mean Sea Level (MSL) is approximately equal to 37 37 0m AHD with the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) 38 and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) defined as 1.5m AHD39 and - 1.5m AHD respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}.38 and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) defined as 3.6m AHD 39 and -3.9m AHD respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}. 40 40 These values are tidal 41 41 predictions based on continous tidal observations from Standard Ports -
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/computational_setup.tex
r3364 r3365 2 2 determined. Preliminary investigations have indicated the point 3 3 at which the output from MOST is the input to ANUGA is 4 sufficient at the 100m bathymetric contour line\footnote{ 4 sufficient at between the 50m and 100m bathymetric contour line. 5 In constrast to the Onslow study, 6 we choose the 50m contour line as the seaward boundary due primarily 7 to computational constraints. 8 \footnote{ 5 9 Preliminary investigations indicate that MOST and ANUGA compare 6 well at the 100m contour line. In addition, the resolution for10 well at the 50m and 100m contour line. In addition, the resolution for 7 11 the MOST modelling indicate that it can theoretically model 8 12 tsunamis with a wavelength of 20-30km, and the wavelength of 9 13 the tsunami wave at the boundary is approximately 20km. A much 10 14 higher model resolution will be used in developing the probabilistic 11 models for further studies.}. Historical runup heights are15 models for further studies.}. Historical runup heights are 12 16 of the order of 10m and we would expect that a tsunami wave 13 17 would penetrate no higher for this scenario. 14 18 Current computation requirements define a coastline 15 extent of around 100km. Therefore, the study area of around 6300km$^2$19 extent of around 100km. Therefore, the study area of around ? km$^2$ 16 20 covers approximately 100km of 17 coastline and extends offshore to the 100m contour line and inshore to21 coastline and extends offshore to the 50m contour line and inshore to 18 22 approximately 10m elevation. 19 23 … … 33 37 \caption{Study area for the Port Hedland scenario highlighting four regions of increased refinement. 34 38 Region 1: Surrounds Port Hedland town centre with a cell area of 500 m$^2$ (lateral accuracy 30m). 35 Region 2: Surrounds the coastal region with a cell area of 2500 m$^2$ (lateral accuracy 70m).36 Region 3: Water depths to the 50m contour line (approximately) with a cell area of 2 0000 m$^2$ (later accuracy 200m).39 Region 2: Surrounds the coastal region with a cell area of 50000 m$^2$ (lateral accuracy 220m). 40 Region 3: Water depths to the 50m contour line (approximately) with a cell area of 250000 m$^2$ (later accuracy 700m). 37 41 } 38 42 \label{fig:pt_hedland_area} … … 45 49 46 50 \caption{Computational mesh for Port Hedland study area where the 47 cell areas increase in resolution; 500 m$^2$, 2500 m$^2$, 20000 48 m$^2$ and 100000 m$^2$.} 51 cell areas increase in resolution; 500 m$^2$, 50000 m$^2$ and 250000 m$^2$.} 49 52 \label{fig:mesh_pt_hedland} 50 53 \end{figure} -
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/data.tex
r3364 r3365 40 40 {../report_figures/pt_hedland_dted_contour.jpg}} 41 41 42 % \caption{Port Hedland region showing the - 1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)43 %and - 1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the DTED Level 2 data.}42 % \caption{Port Hedland region showing the -3.9m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 43 %and -3.6m AHD (LAT) contour lines using the DTED Level 2 data.} 44 44 % \label{fig:contours_dted} 45 45 %\end{figure} … … 50 50 {../report_figures/pt_hedland_dli_contour.jpg}} 51 51 52 \caption{Port Hedland region showing the - 1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)53 and 1.5m AHD (HAT) contour lines using the (a) DTED Level 2 data and52 \caption{Port Hedland region showing the -3.9m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 53 and 3.6m AHD (HAT) contour lines using the (a) DTED Level 2 data and 54 54 the (b) WA DLI data.} 55 55 % \label{fig:contours_dli}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.