Changeset 3380
- Timestamp:
- Jul 19, 2006, 2:03:57 PM (18 years ago)
- Location:
- production/pt_hedland_2006/report
- Files:
-
- 3 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/damage.tex
r3379 r3380 43 43 district level derived from the ABS 2001 Census. 44 44 45 There are an estimated 46 ? residential structures and a population of approximately ? 47 in Port Hedland\footnote{Population is determined by census data and the 1999 45 South Hedland is not exposed to inundation in this 46 scenario, we therefore restrict the damage modelling to a smaller section of the NBED. 47 For the damage modelling, there 48 are an estimated 3700 residential structures and a population of approximately 49 11500\footnote{Population is determined by census data and the 1999 48 50 ABS housing survey}. 49 The damage to the residential structures in th e Pt Hedland community51 The damage to the residential structures in this section of the Port Hedland community 50 52 is summarised in Table \ref{table:damageoutput}. The percentage 51 53 of repair cost to structural value shown is based on the total structural value 52 54 of \$M. Likewise, the percentage of contents loss shown is 53 55 based on the total contents value of \$M for 54 the Onslowregion.56 the region. 55 57 %The injuries sustained is summarised in Table \ref{table:injuries}. 56 58 The HAT scenario is the only scenario to cause damage 57 to Onslow with around 10-15\% of the population affected.59 to Port Hedland with around \% of the population affected. 58 60 59 61 \begin{table}[h] … … 90 92 and would be therefore overlooked in damage model estimates. 91 93 92 There are four indigeneous communities located in this study area. 93 The community located in a potentially vulnerable 94 There are four indigeneous communities located in this study areal Tjalkli Warra, Jinparinya, 95 Punju Ngarugundi Njamal and Tjalka Boorda. 96 Tjalka Boorda is located in a potentially vulnerable 94 97 position 95 (on the headland) is Tjalka Boorda whose population is not registered. 98 (on the headland) whose population is not registered 99 \footnote{get a reference from Anita}. 100 %The community is not affected for any of the scenarios (see Figure 101 %\ref{fig:gaugeTjalkaBoordaAboriginalReserve}). 96 102 97 During the HAT scenario, over ?m of water will inundate parts of the community causing significant impact? 98 99 \begin{center} 100 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 101 Easting & Northing & Community & Population \\ \hline 102 677055.85& 7742819.31& Tjalkli Warra& 100 \\ \hline 103 690756.92& 7746148.99& Jinparinya& 30 \\ \hline 104 691091.39& 7747119.61& Punju Ngarugundi Njamal& 22 \\ \hline 105 669526.15& 7752820.51& Tjalka Boorda & 0 \\ \hline 106 \end{tabular} 107 \end{center} 103 %\begin{center} 104 %\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 105 %Easting & Northing & Community & Population \\ \hline 106 %677055.85& 7742819.31& Tjalkli Warra& 100 \\ \hline 107 %690756.92& 7746148.99& Jinparinya& 30 \\ \hline 108 %691091.39& 7747119.61& Punju Ngarugundi Njamal& 22 \\ \hline 109 %669526.15& 7752820.51& Tjalka Boorda & 0 \\ \hline 110 %\end{tabular} 111 %\end{center} 108 112 109 113 -
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/interpretation.tex
r3375 r3380 35 35 \end{center} 36 36 \end{table} 37 38 {\bf this needs to reflect what happens for port hedland} 37 39 38 40 Examining the offshore locations shown in Appendix -
production/pt_hedland_2006/report/introduction.tex
r3375 r3380 29 29 Subsequent assessments will use refined hazard models with 30 30 associate return rates for other localities, as advised by FESA. 31 P t Hedland has a population of around 42000 (including South Hedland) and31 Port Hedland has a population of around 42000 (including South Hedland) and 32 32 is part of the Pilbara region of Western Autralia 33 33 \footnote{http://www.porthedland.wa.gov.au/}. Pt Hedland itself has a
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.