Changeset 3407


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 23, 2006, 12:20:47 PM (19 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

tex fixups

Location:
production/onslow_2006/report
Files:
7 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    2828\item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides),
    2929\item boundary conditions (the tsunami source as described in
    30 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}), and
     30Section \ref{sec:methodology}), and
    3131\item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction.
    3232\end{itemize}

  • production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    6262The final item to be addressed to complete the model setup is the
    6363definition of the boundary condition. As
    64 discussed in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}, a Mw 9 event provides
     64discussed in Section \ref{sec:methodology}, a Mw 9 event provides
    6565the tsunami source. The resultant tsunami wave is made up of a series
    6666of waves with different amplitudes which is affected by the energy

  • production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex

    r3405 r3407  
    3434\begin{table}[h]
    3535\label{table:speedexamples}
     36\caption{Examples of a range of velocities.}
    3637\begin{center}
    37 \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.}
    38 \label{table:speedexamples}
    3938\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
    4039{\bf Velocity (m/s)} & {\bf Example} \\ \hline
    … …  
    6968
    7069These
    71 features are illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeest}
     70features are illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeast}
    7271where a small wave can be seen at around 200 mins. For the HAT
    7372case (shown in blue), the amplitude
    … …  
    7574scenario, the initial water level is 1.5 m, which means that
    7675the actual amplitude is the difference between the stage value
    77 and the initial water level; 2.3 - 1.5).
     76and the initial water level; 2.3 - 1.5}.
    7877The drawdown of around 4.3 m (i.e. 2.3 - -2) then occurs at around 230 mins
    7978(i.e. 3.8 hours after the event has been generated), before
    … …  
    162161the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre. 
    163162The airport remains
    164 free of inundation for each tidal scenario. Section \ref{sec:damage}
     163free of inundation for each tidal scenario. Section \ref{sec:impact}
    165164details the impact estimates to the residential infrastructure.

  • production/onslow_2006/report/introduction.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    2525of the North West Shelf. The scenario used for this study has
    2626an unknown return period, but is considered a plausible event (see
    27 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}).
     27Section \ref{sec:methodology}).
    2828Subsequent assessments will use refined hazard models with
    2929associate return periods. A suite of assessments will be

  • production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex

    r3367 r3407  
    6363    \input{modelling_methodology}
    6464   
    65   \section{Tsunami scenarios}
    66     \label{sec:tsunamiscenario}
    67     \input{tsunami_scenario}
     65%  \section{Tsunami scenarios}
     66%    \label{sec:tsunamiscenario}
     67%    \input{tsunami_scenario}
    6868
    6969  \section{Data sources}
    … …  
    122122     \input{damage}
    123123
    124    \section{Impact due to data accuracy}
    125      \input{discussion}
    126      \label{sec:issues}
     124%   \section{Impact due to data accuracy}
     125%     \input{discussion}
     126%     \label{sec:issues}
    127127
    128128     \section{Summary}

  • production/onslow_2006/report/references.tex

    r3240 r3407  
    88Tsunami (MOST) model, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-112.
    99
    10 \bibitem{somerville:urs} Somerville, P., Thio, H.K. and Ichinose, G. (2005)
    11 Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Report delivered to Geoscience
    12 Australia 2005.
     10%\bibitem{somerville:urs} Somerville, P., Thio, H.K. and Ichinose, G. (2005)
     11%Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Report delivered to Geoscience
     12%Australia 2005.
    1313
    1414\bibitem{matsuyama:1999}

  • production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    77scenario have also been described.
    88
    9 As discussed in Section \ref{sec:issues}, it is imperative
     9As shown in Section \ref{sec:data}, it is imperative
    1010that the best available data is used to increase confidence
    1111in the inundation maps.
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.