Changeset 3407


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 23, 2006, 12:20:47 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

tex fixups

Location:
production/onslow_2006/report
Files:
7 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    2828\item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides),
    2929\item boundary conditions (the tsunami source as described in
    30 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}), and
     30Section \ref{sec:methodology}), and
    3131\item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction.
    3232\end{itemize}
  • production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    6262The final item to be addressed to complete the model setup is the
    6363definition of the boundary condition. As
    64 discussed in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}, a Mw 9 event provides
     64discussed in Section \ref{sec:methodology}, a Mw 9 event provides
    6565the tsunami source. The resultant tsunami wave is made up of a series
    6666of waves with different amplitudes which is affected by the energy
  • production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex

    r3405 r3407  
    3434\begin{table}[h]
    3535\label{table:speedexamples}
     36\caption{Examples of a range of velocities.}
    3637\begin{center}
    37 \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.}
    38 \label{table:speedexamples}
    3938\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
    4039{\bf Velocity (m/s)} & {\bf Example} \\ \hline
     
    6968
    7069These
    71 features are illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeest}
     70features are illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeast}
    7271where a small wave can be seen at around 200 mins. For the HAT
    7372case (shown in blue), the amplitude
     
    7574scenario, the initial water level is 1.5 m, which means that
    7675the actual amplitude is the difference between the stage value
    77 and the initial water level; 2.3 - 1.5).
     76and the initial water level; 2.3 - 1.5}.
    7877The drawdown of around 4.3 m (i.e. 2.3 - -2) then occurs at around 230 mins
    7978(i.e. 3.8 hours after the event has been generated), before
     
    162161the road infrastructure in the Onslow town centre. 
    163162The airport remains
    164 free of inundation for each tidal scenario. Section \ref{sec:damage}
     163free of inundation for each tidal scenario. Section \ref{sec:impact}
    165164details the impact estimates to the residential infrastructure.
  • production/onslow_2006/report/introduction.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    2525of the North West Shelf. The scenario used for this study has
    2626an unknown return period, but is considered a plausible event (see
    27 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}).
     27Section \ref{sec:methodology}).
    2828Subsequent assessments will use refined hazard models with
    2929associate return periods. A suite of assessments will be
  • production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex

    r3367 r3407  
    6363    \input{modelling_methodology}
    6464   
    65   \section{Tsunami scenarios}
    66     \label{sec:tsunamiscenario}
    67     \input{tsunami_scenario}
     65%  \section{Tsunami scenarios}
     66%    \label{sec:tsunamiscenario}
     67%    \input{tsunami_scenario}
    6868
    6969  \section{Data sources}
     
    122122     \input{damage}
    123123
    124    \section{Impact due to data accuracy}
    125      \input{discussion}
    126      \label{sec:issues}
     124%   \section{Impact due to data accuracy}
     125%     \input{discussion}
     126%     \label{sec:issues}
    127127
    128128     \section{Summary}
  • production/onslow_2006/report/references.tex

    r3240 r3407  
    88Tsunami (MOST) model, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-112.
    99
    10 \bibitem{somerville:urs} Somerville, P., Thio, H.K. and Ichinose, G. (2005)
    11 Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Report delivered to Geoscience
    12 Australia 2005.
     10%\bibitem{somerville:urs} Somerville, P., Thio, H.K. and Ichinose, G. (2005)
     11%Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Report delivered to Geoscience
     12%Australia 2005.
    1313
    1414\bibitem{matsuyama:1999}
  • production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex

    r3402 r3407  
    77scenario have also been described.
    88
    9 As discussed in Section \ref{sec:issues}, it is imperative
     9As shown in Section \ref{sec:data}, it is imperative
    1010that the best available data is used to increase confidence
    1111in the inundation maps.
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.