Changeset 3988


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 14, 2006, 3:04:25 PM (16 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

dampier report updates

Location:
anuga_work/production/dampier_2006
Files:
2 added
6 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/make_report_cipma.py

    r3959 r3988  
    8484max_maps = {'Mw 9.0': 'mw9_map'}
    8585
    86 gauge_map = 'cipma_gauges.jpg'
     86gauge_map = 'dampier_gauges.jpg'
    8787gauge_filename = 'test.xya'
    8888# Create sections and graphs for each designated production directory
     
    226226
    227227# Generate latex output for location points
    228 s = '\\begin{table} \\begin{center} \n'
    229 fid.write(s)
    230 s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario_name
    231 fid.write(s)
    232 s = """
    233 \label{table:locations}
    234 \\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
    235 \\bf{Point Name} & \\bf{Easting} & \\bf{Northing} & \\bf{Elevation}\\\\ \hline
    236 """
    237 fid.write(s)
    238 
    239 gauges, locations, elevation = get_gauges_from_file(project.gauge_filename)
    240 
    241 for name, gauges, elev in zip(locations, gauges, elevation):
    242     east = gauges[0]
    243     north = gauges[1]
    244     s = '%s & %.2f & %.2f & %.2f \\\\ \hline \n' %(name.replace('_',' '), east, north, elev)
    245     fid.write(s)
    246 
    247 s = '\\end{tabular} \n  \end{center} \n \end{table} \n \n'
    248 fid.write(s)
    249 
    250 #s = '\\begin{figure}[hbt] \n \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=\paperwidth]{../report_figures/%s}}' %gauge_map
    251 #fid.write(s)
     228##s = '\\begin{table} \\begin{center} \n'
     229##fid.write(s)
     230##s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario_name
     231##fid.write(s)
     232##s = """
     233##\label{table:locations}
     234##\\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
     235##\\bf{Point Name} & \\bf{Easting} & \\bf{Northing} & \\bf{Elevation}\\\\ \hline
     236##"""
     237##fid.write(s)
     238##
     239##gauges, locations, elevation = get_gauges_from_file(project.gauge_filename)
     240##
     241##for name, gauges, elev in zip(locations, gauges, elevation):
     242##    east = gauges[0]
     243##    north = gauges[1]
     244##    s = '%s & %.2f & %.2f & %.2f \\\\ \hline \n' %(name.replace('_',' '), east, north, elev)
     245##    fid.write(s)
     246##
     247##s = '\\end{tabular} \n  \end{center} \n \end{table} \n \n'
     248##fid.write(s)
     249##
     250s = '\\begin{figure}[hbt] \n \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=\paperwidth]{../report_figures/%s}}' %gauge_map
     251fid.write(s)
    252252
    253253#s  = """
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3955 r3988  
    2424\begin{figure}[hbt]
    2525
    26   %\centerline{ \includegraphics[scale=0.15]{../report_figures/dampier_resolution_zones.jpg}}
     26  \centerline{ \includegraphics[scale=0.15]{../report_figures/dampier_model.jpg}}
    2727
    2828  \caption{Study area for Dampier scenario highlighting four regions of increased refinement.
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/report/dampier_2006_report_CIPMA.tex

    r3959 r3988  
    7272     \label{sec:results}
    7373         
    74 \begin{table} \begin{center}
    75 \caption{Defined point locations for dampier study area.}
    76 \label{table:locations}
    77 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
    78 \bf{Point Name} & \bf{Easting} & \bf{Northing} & \bf{Elevation}\\ \hline
    79 facility & 476207.36 & 7723356.47 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    80 pipeline1 & 476265.07 & 7724374.92 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    81 pipeline2 & 476636.17 & 7724412.99 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    82 pipeline3 & 476116.11 & 7743471.30 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    83 pipeline4 & 476911.02 & 7733579.11 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    84 pipeline5 & 467786.69 & 7757885.91 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    85 pipeline6 & 463430.70 & 7756564.43 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    86 boundaryNW & 442923.91 & 7750054.93 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    87 boundaryNE & 484330.25 & 7755928.16 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    88 internal & 469353.49 & 7740461.97 & 0.00 \\ \hline
    89 \end{tabular}
    90   \end{center}
    91  \end{table}
    92  
    93 \input{mw9_map}
     74\begin{figure}[hbt]
     75 \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=\paperwidth]{../report_figures/dampier_gauges.jpg}}\input{mw9_map}
    9476 \clearpage
    9577 
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/report/data.tex

    r3955 r3988  
    4141at the derived coastline.
    4242
    43 Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare} shows the contour lines for
    44 HAT, MSL and LAT for Dampier using the combined DLI and DTED data.
     43%Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare} shows the contour lines for
     44%HAT, MSL and LAT for Dampier using the combined DLI and DTED data.
    4545
    46 \begin{figure}[p]
    47 \center{(a)}
     46%\begin{figure}[p]
     47%\center{(a)}
    4848  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]{../report_figures/dampier_contour.jpg}}
    4949
    50   \caption{Dampier region showing the -m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)
    51 and 2.4m AHD (HAT) contour lines using the combined DTED Level 2 data and
    52 the WA DLI data.}
    53  \label{fig:contours_compare}
    54 \end{figure}
     50%  \caption{Dampier region showing the -m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL)
     51%and 2.4m AHD (HAT) contour lines using the combined DTED Level 2 data and
     52%the WA DLI data.}
     53 %\label{fig:contours_compare}
     54%\end{figure}
    5555
    5656
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/report/modelling_methodology.tex

    r3955 r3988  
    6363The event chosen for this study has been determined from the probabilistic
    6464hazard modelling being undertaken by the Earthquake and Hazards Project.
    65 The likelihood of the Mw 9.0 event is estimated to be years.
     65The low probability, high potential impact Mw 9.0 event has been chosen
     66for this study.
    6667
    67 \begin{figure}[h]
     68%\begin{figure}[h]
    6869
    6970  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=140mm, height=100mm]
    7071%{../report_figures/mw9.jpg}}
    7172
    72   \caption{Maximum wave height (in cms) for a Mw 9.0 event off the
    73 coast of Java}
    74   \label{fig:mw9}
    75 \end{figure}
     73%  \caption{Maximum wave height (in cms) for a Mw 9.0 event off the
     74%coast of Java}
     75%  \label{fig:mw9}
     76%\end{figure}
    7677
    7778
  • anuga_work/production/dampier_2006/report/summary.tex

    r3955 r3988  
    33generated by a Mw 9 earthquake on the Sunda Arc subduction zone
    44occurring at Highest Astronomical Tide.
    5 The return period for this event is estimated to be ?.
    65Velocity data has also been provided at the locations of interest surrounding the gas pipeline.
    76The results described must be tempered with the modelling assumptions
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.