Changeset 5140

Timestamp:

Mar 7, 2008, 4:56:35 PM (17 years ago)

Author:

duncan

Message:

adding pdfs with alot of white space at the bottom on the pretext that no pdf is worse that crappy pdf's. pdflatex uses them. I made them in irfanview.

Location:

anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007

Files:

• anuga_validation.tex (modified) (6 diffs)
• uq-flume-depth.pdf (added)
• uq-flume-sloped-depth.pdf (added)
• uq-flume-sloped-velocity.pdf (added)
• uq-flume-velocity.pdf (added)
• uq-friction-depth.pdf (added)

anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007/anuga_validation.tex

@@ -15 +15 @@
 % what packages to use.  Three useful packages are the following:
 \usepackage{graphicx} % avoid epsfig or earlier such packages
+
+
 \usepackage{url}      % for URLs and DOIs
 \newcommand{\doi}[1]{\url{http://dx.doi.org/#1}}
@@ -63 +65 @@
 
 \newcommand{\code}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
+
 
 
@@ -487 +490 @@
 modelling capability. 
 
-\subsection{UQ friction Validation}
+\subsection{Manning's Friction Model Validation}
  
 % Validation UQ friction
@@ -494 +497 @@
 % run plot.py to create graphs, and move them here
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
-\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-friction-depth.eps}}
+\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-friction-depth}}
 \caption{Comparison of wave tank and \ANUGA{} water height at .4 m
   from the gate, simulated using a Mannings friction of 0.0 and 0.1.}\label{fig:uq-friction-depth}
 \end{figure}
 
- Friction is modelled in ANUGA using the Manning's friction
+ The bed friction is modelled in ANUGA using the Manning's 
  model. Validation of this model was carried out by comparing results
  from ANUGA against experimental results from flume wave tanks. The
@@ -505 +508 @@
 at St Lucia, University of Queensland.
  
- 
+%The Manning's friction model is 
+
+%To validate the friction model 
+
+\subsection{Stage and Velocity Validation in a Flume}
 % Validation UQ flume
 % at X:\anuga_validation\uq_sloped_flume_2008
 % run run_dam.py to create sww file and .csv files
 % run plot.py to create graphs heere automatically
+% The Coasts and Ports '2007 paper is in TRIM d2007-17186
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
-\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-flume-depth.eps}}
+\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-flume-depth}}
 \caption{Comparison of wave tank and \ANUGA{} water height at .4 m
   from the gate}\label{fig:uq-flume-depth}
@@ -517 +525 @@
 
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
-\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-flume-velocity.eps}}
+\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{uq-flume-velocity}}
 \caption{Comparison of wave tank and \ANUGA{} water velocity at .45 m
   from the gate}\label{fig:uq-flume-velocity}
 \end{figure}
 
-Flume data from the University of Queensland has also been used for
-validating the water height and velocity predicted by \ANUGA{}.  The
-Flume was set up for Dam-break experiments, having a water reservior
-at one end.  The flume was glass-sided, 3m long, 0.4m in wide, and
-0.4m deep, with a PVC bottom. The reservoir in the flume was 0.75m
-long.  For this experiment the reservoir water was 0.2m deep. At time
-zero the reservoir gate is opened and the water flows into the other
-side of the flume.  The water ran up a flume slope of 0.03 m/m.  To
-accurately model the bed surface a Manning's friction value of 0.01,
-representing PVC was used.
+Flume experiments caried out at the University of Queensland has also
+been used for validating the water height and velocity predicted by
+\ANUGA{}.  The Flume was set up for Dam-break experiments, having a
+water reservior at one end.  The flume was glass-sided, 3m long, 0.4m
+in wide, and 0.4m deep, with a PVC bottom. The reservoir in the flume
+was 0.75m long.  For this experiment the reservoir water was 0.2m
+deep. At time zero the reservoir gate is opened and the water flows
+into the other side of the flume.  The water ran up a flume slope of
+0.03 m/m.  To accurately model the bed surface a Manning's friction
+value of 0.01, representing PVC was used.
 
 % Neale, L.C. and R.E. Price.  Flow characteristics of PVC sewer pipe.