Changeset 5599 for anuga_work

Timestamp:

Aug 4, 2008, 9:20:36 AM (16 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

(1) update to validation paper - references and loose text and (2) update to urs2sts testing

Location:

anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007

Files:

• anuga-bibliography.bib (modified) (1 diff)
• anuga_validation.tex (modified) (3 diffs)

anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007/anuga-bibliography.bib

@@ -383 +383 @@
 }
 
+@ARTICLE{Delis2008,
+AUTHOR = {A. I. Delis, M. Kazolea and N. A. Kampanis},
+TITLE = {A robust high-resolution finite volume scheme for the simulation of long waves
+over complex domains},
+YEAR = {2008},
+volume = {56},
+pages = {419--452},
+JOURNAL = {International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids},
+}
+
+@ARTICLE{DaiHong2007,
+AUTHOR = {D-H. Kim, Y-S, Cho and Y-K, Yi},
+TITLE = {Propagation and run-up of nearshore tsunamis with HLLC approximated Riemann solver},
+YEAR = {2007},
+volume = {34},
+pages = {1164--1173},
+JOURNAL = {Ocean Engineering},
+}
+
+@ARTICLE{Brocchini2008,
+AUTHOR = {M. Brocchini and N. Dodd},
+TITLE = {Nonlinear Shallow Water Equation Modeling for Coastal Engineering},
+YEAR = {2008},
+volume = {March-April},
+pages = {104--119},
+JOURNAL = {Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering},
+}
+
+@ARTICLE{Fuhrman2008,
+AUTHOR = {D. R. Fuhrman and P. A. Madsen},
+TITLE = {Simulation of nonlinear wave run-up with a high-order Boussinesq model},
+YEAR = {2008},
+volume = {55},
+pages = {139--154},
+JOURNAL = {Ocean Engineering},
+}

anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007/anuga_validation.tex

@@ -62 +62 @@
 \ead{Matthew.Barnes@uq.edu.au}
 
-\address[GA]{Natural Hazard Impacts Project,
+\address[GA]{Georisk Project,
  Geospatial and Earh Monitoring Division, 
  Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia} 
@@ -152 +152 @@
 tests. They described the evolution of these models from fixed, nested
 to adaptive grids and the ability of the solvers to cope with the
-moving shoreline. They highlighted the difficulty in verify the
+moving shoreline. They highlighted the difficulty in verifying the
 nonlinear shallow water equations themselves as the only standard
 analytical solution is that of \citet{Carrier58} that is strictly for 
@@ -201 +201 @@
 conclusions outlined in section~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
 
+NOTE: This is just a brain dump at the moment and needs to be incorporated properly
+in the text somewhere.
+
+Need some discussion on Bousssinesq type models - Boussinesq equations get the 
+nonlinearity and dispersive effects to a high degree of accuracy
+
+moving wet-dry boundary algorithms - applicability to coastal engineering
+
+Fuhrman and Madesn 2008 \cite{Fuhrman2008}do validation - they have a Boussinesq type 
+model, finite
+difference (therefore needing a supercomputer), 4th order, four stage RK time stepping
+scheme.
+ 
+their tests are (1) nonlinear run-up on periodic and transient waves on a sloping
+beach with excellent comparison to analytic solutions (2) 2d parabolic basin
+(3) solitary wave evolution through 2d triangular channel (4) solitary wave evolution on 
+conical island (we need to compare to their computation time and note they use a 
+vertical exaggeration for their images)
+
+excellent accuracy mentioned - but what is it - what does it mean?
+
+of interest is that they mention mass conservation and calculate it throughout the simulations
+
+Kim et al \cite{DaiHong2007} use Riemann solver - talk about improved accuracy by using 2nd order upwind
+scheme. Use finite volume on a structured mesh. Do parabolic basic and circular island. Needed?
+
+Delis et all 2008 \cite{Delis2008}- finite volume, Godunov-type explicit scheme coupled with Roe's
+approximate Riemann solver. It accurately describes breaking waves as bores or hydraulic jumps
+and conserves volume across flow discontinuties - is this just a result of finite volume?
+
+They also show mass conservation for most of the simulations
+
+similar range of validation tests that compare well - our job to compare to these as well
 
 \section{Mathematical model, numerical scheme and implementation}