Changeset 5679
- Timestamp:
- Aug 25, 2008, 3:04:15 PM (16 years ago)
- Location:
- anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007
- Files:
-
- 8 added
- 8 deleted
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
anuga_work/publications/anuga_2007/anuga_validation.tex
r5678 r5679 563 563 period range of 0.3 - 7.0 seconds. 564 564 565 Four tests with different combinations of wave height and wave period566 were used, with each testbeing repeated once.565 Four scenarios with different combinations of wave height and wave period 566 were used, with each scenario being repeated once. 567 567 568 568 A variety of measurements were taken during the simulation. Mid-depth … … 572 572 determined the location of breaking waves. All the tests produced 4 to 573 573 7 waves. Generally the first wave did not break, with subsequent 574 waves breaking; accept for T2R1 and T2R2, for which the first 3 waves574 waves breaking; accept for scenario 2, for which the first 3 waves 575 575 did not break. 576 576 … … 585 585 Test Name & Beach slope nominal, \emph{degrees} & Water depth offshore, 586 586 \emph{mm } & Wave frequency nominal, \emph{Hz} \\ \hline 587 T1R1 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.200 \\ \hline588 T1R2 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.200 \\ \hline589 T2R1 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.125 \\ \hline590 T2R2 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.125 \\ \hline591 T3R1 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.200 \\ \hline592 T3R2 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.200 \\ \hline593 T4R1 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.125 \\ \hline594 T4R2 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.125 \\ \hline587 S1R1 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.200 \\ \hline 588 S1R2 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.200 \\ \hline 589 S2R1 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.125 \\ \hline 590 S2R2 & 3.5 & 400 & 0.125 \\ \hline 591 S3R1 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.200 \\ \hline 592 S3R2 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.200 \\ \hline 593 S4R1 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.125 \\ \hline 594 S4R2 & 1.5 & 336 & 0.125 \\ \hline 595 595 596 596 % Mapping of new names to old names … … 624 624 \] 625 625 626 Figures \ref{fig:T1-rmsd} to \ref{fig:T4-rmsd} show the RMSD of all 627 the sensors in four tests and the location where each wave broke. 628 629 Figures \ref{fig:T1-rmsd} to \ref{fig:T4-rmsd} show the RMSD of each 626 Figures \ref{fig:S1-rmsd} to \ref{fig:S4-rmsd} show the RMSD of each 630 627 sensor in four tests and the location where each wave broke. The 631 628 RMSD is calculated over the time of the experiment. 632 629 633 630 \begin{figure}[htbp] 634 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{ T1-rmsd}}635 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for T1R1 and T1R2}636 \label{fig: T1-rmsd}637 \end{figure} 638 639 640 \begin{figure}[htbp] 641 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{ T2-rmsd}}642 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for T2R1 and T2R2}643 \label{fig: T2-rmsd}644 \end{figure} 645 646 \begin{figure}[htbp] 647 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{ T3-rmsd}}648 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for T3R1 and T3R2}649 \label{fig: T3-rmsd}650 \end{figure} 651 652 \begin{figure}[htbp] 653 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{ T4-rmsd}}654 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for T4R1 and T4R2}655 \label{fig: T4-rmsd}631 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{S1-rmsd}} 632 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for S1R1 and S1R2} 633 \label{fig:S1-rmsd} 634 \end{figure} 635 636 637 \begin{figure}[htbp] 638 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{S2-rmsd}} 639 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for S2R1 and S2R2} 640 \label{fig:S2-rmsd} 641 \end{figure} 642 643 \begin{figure}[htbp] 644 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{S3-rmsd}} 645 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for S3R1 and S3R2} 646 \label{fig:S3-rmsd} 647 \end{figure} 648 649 \begin{figure}[htbp] 650 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{S4-rmsd}} 651 \caption{RMSD of stage between the wave tank and ANUGA for S4R1 and S4R2} 652 \label{fig:S4-rmsd} 656 653 \end{figure} 657 654 658 655 For a more direct comparision between the simulation and the 659 656 experiment the stages at three gauges, generally the initial, final 660 and worst fit, were compared in Figures \ref{fig: T1-stage-compare} to661 \ref{fig: T4-stage-compare}.662 663 664 \begin{figure}[htbp] 665 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{ T1-stage-compare}}657 and worst fit, were compared in Figures \ref{fig:S1-stage-compare} to 658 \ref{fig:S4-stage-compare}. 659 660 661 \begin{figure}[htbp] 662 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{S1-stage-compare}} 666 663 \caption{Comparison of wave tank (solid line) and ANUGA (broken line) 667 water stages at three gauges for T1R1.}668 \label{fig: T1-stage-compare}669 \end{figure} 670 671 \begin{figure}[htbp] 672 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{ T2-stage-compare}}664 water stages at three gauges for S1R1.} 665 \label{fig:S1-stage-compare} 666 \end{figure} 667 668 \begin{figure}[htbp] 669 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{S2-stage-compare}} 673 670 \caption{Comparison of wave tank (solid line) and ANUGA (broken line) 674 671 water stages at three 675 gauges for T2R1.}676 \label{fig: T2-stage-compare}677 \end{figure} 678 679 \begin{figure}[htbp] 680 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{ T3-stage-compare}}672 gauges for S2R1.} 673 \label{fig:S2-stage-compare} 674 \end{figure} 675 676 \begin{figure}[htbp] 677 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{S3-stage-compare}} 681 678 \caption{Comparison of wave tank (solid line) and ANUGA (broken line) 682 679 water stages at three 683 gauges for T3R1.}684 \label{fig: T3-stage-compare}685 \end{figure} 686 687 \begin{figure}[htbp] 688 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{ T4-stage-compare}}680 gauges for S3R1.} 681 \label{fig:S3-stage-compare} 682 \end{figure} 683 684 \begin{figure}[htbp] 685 \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in]{S4-stage-compare}} 689 686 \caption{Comparison of wave tank (solid line) and ANUGA (broken line) 690 687 water stages at three 691 gauges for T4R1.}692 \label{fig: T4-stage-compare}688 gauges for S4R1.} 689 \label{fig:S4-stage-compare} 693 690 \end{figure} 694 691
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.