Changeset 7377
- Timestamp:
- Aug 16, 2009, 8:28:05 PM (16 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
anuga_work/publications/boxing_day_validation_2008/patong_validation.tex
r7303 r7377 14 14 %----------title-------------% 15 15 \title{Benchmarking Tsunami Models using the December 2004 Indian 16 Ocean Tsunami and its Impact at Patong B each}16 Ocean Tsunami and its Impact at Patong Bay} 17 17 18 18 %-------authors----------- … … 35 35 %------Abstract-------------- 36 36 \begin{abstract} 37 In this paper a new benchmark for tsunami model validation is 38 proposed.The benchmark is based upon the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami,39 which affords a uniquely large amount of observational data for model40 comparison.Unlike the small number of existing benchmarks, the37 This paper proposes a new benchmark for tsunami model validation. 38 The benchmark is based upon the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, 39 which affords a uniquely large amount of observational data for events of this kind. 40 Unlike the small number of existing benchmarks, the 41 41 proposed test validates all three stages of tsunami evolution - 42 generation , propagation and inundation. Specifically we use geodetic42 generation (FIXME (Jane): really?), propagation and inundation. Specifically we use geodetic 43 43 measurements of the Sumatra--Andaman earthquake to validate the 44 44 tsunami source, altimetry data from the \textsc{jason} satellite to 45 45 test open ocean propagation, eye-witness accounts to assess near shore 46 propagation and a detailed inundation survey of Patong Bay, Thailand46 propagation and a detailed inundation survey of Patong city, Thailand 47 47 to compare model and observed inundation. Furthermore we utilise this 48 48 benchmark to further validate the hydrodynamic modelling tool … … 62 62 63 63 \section{Introduction} 64 Tsunami area potential hazard to coastal communities all over the64 Tsunami is a potential hazard to coastal communities all over the 65 65 world. A number of recent large events have increased community and 66 66 scientific awareness of the need for effective detection, forecasting, 67 and emergency preparedness. Probabilistic, geo logical, hydrodynamic,68 and economicmodels are required to predict the location and67 and emergency preparedness. Probabilistic, geophysical and hydrodynamic 68 models are required to predict the location and 69 69 likelihood of an event, the initial sea floor deformation and 70 subsequent propagation and inundation of the tsunami, the 71 effectiveness of hazard mitigation procedures and the economic impact 72 of such measures and of the event itself. Here we focus on modelling of 73 the physical processes. 74 %OLE: I commented this out 23 June 2009 as there was no reference. 75 %For discussion on economic and decision based 76 %models refer to~\cite{} and the references therein. 70 subsequent propagation and inundation of the tsunami. Engineering, economic and social vulnerability models can then be used to estimate the 71 impact of the event as well as the effectiveness of hazard mitigation 72 procedures. In this paper, we focus on modelling of 73 the physical processes only. 77 74 78 75 Various approaches are currently used to assess the potential impact … … 126 123 data also significantly increases the uncertainty of the validation 127 124 experiment that may constrain the ability to make unequivocal 128 statements~\cite{bates01}. 125 statements~\cite{bates01}. FIXME (Jane): Because? 126 FIXME (Phil): references to all of the paragraph above, please 129 127 130 128 Currently, the extent of tsunami-related field data is limited. The … … 133 131 tsunamis pose greatest threat. The resulting lack of data has limited 134 132 the number of field data sets available to validate tsunami 135 models. Synolakis et al~\cite{synolakis07} have developed a set of 133 models. 134 135 Synolakis et al~\cite{synolakis07} have developed a set of 136 136 standards, criteria and procedures for evaluating numerical models of 137 137 tsunami. They propose three analytical solutions to help identify the … … 151 151 provides a good test for real-time forecasting models since the tsunami 152 152 was recorded at three tsunameters. The test requires matching the 153 propagation model datawith the DART recording to constrain the153 tsunami propagation model output with the DART recording to constrain the 154 154 tsunami source model, and then using it to reproduce the tide gauge 155 record at Hilo. 155 record at Hilo, Hawaii. 156 FIXME (Jane): Are the tsunameters and the DART recordings the same thing? 156 157 157 158 In this paper we develop a field data benchmark to be used in … … 164 165 of the tsunami source, altimetry data from the JASON satellite to test 165 166 open ocean propagation, eye-witness accounts to assess near shore 166 propagation, and a detailed inundation survey of Patong Bay, Thailand167 propagation, and a detailed inundation survey of Patong city, Thailand 167 168 to compare model and observed inundation. A description of the data 168 169 required to construct the benchmark is given in … … 170 171 171 172 An associated aim of this paper is to illustrate the use of this new 172 benchmark to validate a n operational tsunamiinundation model called173 benchmark to validate a dedicated inundation model called 173 174 \textsc{anuga} used by Geoscience Australia. A description of 174 175 \textsc{anuga} is given in Section~\ref{sec:models} and the validation 175 176 results are given in Section~\ref{sec:results}. 176 177 177 The numerical models used to model tsunami are extremely178 computationally intensive. Fullresolution models of the entire178 The numerical models used to simulate tsunami impact 179 are computationally intensive and high resolution models of the entire 179 180 evolution process will often take a number of days to 180 run. Consequently the uncertainty in model predictions is difficult to 181 quantify. However model uncertainty should not be ignored. Section 182 ~\ref{sec:sensitivity} provides a simple sensitivity analysis that can 181 run. Consequently, the uncertainty in model predictions is difficult to 182 quantify as it would require a very large number of runs. 183 However, model uncertainty should not be ignored. Section 184 ~\ref{sec:sensitivity} provides a simple analysis that can 183 185 be used to investigate the sensitivity of model predictions to model 184 186 parameters. … … 192 194 seismometers, tide gauges, \textsc{gps} surveys, satellite overpasses, 193 195 subsequent coastal field surveys of run-up and flooding, and 194 measurements of coseismic displacements a ndbathymetry from ship-based196 measurements of coseismic displacements as well as bathymetry from ship-based 195 197 expeditions, have now been made 196 available. %~\cite{vigny05,amnon05,kawata05,liu05}. 198 available. %~\cite{vigny05,amnon05,kawata05,liu05}. FIXME (Ole): Refs? 197 199 In this section we present the corresponding data necessary to implement 198 200 the proposed benchmark for each of the three stages of the tsunami's evolution. … … 208 210 by the 2004 Sumatra--Andaman earthquake. 209 211 210 The 2004 Sumatra--Andaman tsunami was generated by a severecoseismic211 displacement of the sea floor as a result ofone of the largest212 The 2004 Sumatra--Andaman tsunami was generated by a coseismic 213 displacement of the sea floor resulting from one of the largest 212 214 earthquakes on record. The mega-thrust earthquake started on the 26 213 215 December 2004 at 0h58'53'' UTC (or just before 8 am local time) … … 248 250 249 251 \subsection{Propagation} 252 \label{sec:propagation data} 250 253 Once generated, a tsunami will propagate outwards from the source until 251 254 it encounters the shallow water bordering coastal regions. This period … … 258 261 259 262 \subsubsection{Bathymetry Data} 260 A number of raw data sets were obtained, analysed and checked for 261 quality and subsequently gridded for easier visualisation and input 262 into the tsunami models. The resulting grid data is relatively coarse 263 in the deeper water and becomes progressively finer as the distance to 264 Patong Bay decreases. 265 266 The nested bathymetry grid was generated from: 263 The bathymetry data used in this study was derived from the following 264 sources: 267 265 \begin{itemize} 268 266 \item a two arc minute grid data set covering the Bay of Bengal, 269 267 DBDB2, obtained from US Naval Research Labs; 270 268 \item a 3 second arc grid covering the whole of the Andaman Sea based 271 on Thai Navy charts no. 45 and no. 362; and 269 on Thai Navy charts no. 45 and no. 362; and 272 270 \item a one second grid created from the digitised Thai Navy 273 271 bathymetry chart, no. 358, which covers Patong Bay and the 274 immediately adjacent regions. 272 immediately adjacent regions. (FIXME (Ole): How was the grid created from these digitised points?) 275 273 \end{itemize} 276 277 The final bathymetry data set consists of four nested grids obtained 278 via interpolation and resampling of the aforementioned data sets. The 279 four grids are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:nested_grids}. The coarsest 274 FIXME (Jane): Refs for all these. 275 276 %A number of raw data sets were obtained, analysed and checked for 277 %quality and subsequently gridded for easier visualisation and input 278 %into the tsunami models. 279 280 These sets were combined via 281 interpolation and resampling to produce four nested grids 282 which are relatively coarse in the deeper water and 283 progressively finer as the distance to 284 Patong Beach decreases as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:nested_grids}. 285 286 The coarsest 280 287 bathymetry was obtained by interpolating the DBDB2 grid to a 27 second 281 288 arc grid. A subsection of this region was then replaced by nine second 282 289 data which was generated by sub-sampling the three second of arc grid from 283 NOAA. A subset of the nine second grid was replaced by the three second 290 NOAA (FIXME (Jane): This was not mentioned in the dots above). 291 A subset of the nine second grid was replaced by the three second 284 292 data. Finally, the one second grid was used to approximate the 285 293 bathymetry in Patong Bay and the immediately adjacent regions. Any 286 294 points that deviated from the general trend near the boundary were 287 deleted .295 deleted as a quality check. 288 296 289 297 The sub-sampling of larger grids was performed by using {\bf resample}, … … 300 308 \begin{center} 301 309 \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{nested_grids} 302 \caption{Nested grids of the elevation data.}310 \caption{Nested bathymetry grids.} 303 311 \label{fig:nested_grids} 304 312 \end{center} … … 306 314 307 315 \subsubsection{JASON Satellite Altimetry}\label{sec:data_jason} 308 During the 26 December 2004 event, the Jasonsatellite tracked from316 During the 26 December 2004 event, the \textsc{jason} satellite tracked from 309 317 north to south and over the equator at 02:55 UTC nearly two hours 310 318 after the earthquake \cite{gower05}. The satellite recorded the sea 311 319 level anomaly compared to the average sea level from its previous five 312 passes over the same region in the 20-30 days prior. 320 passes over the same region in the 20-30 days prior. This data was 313 321 used to validate the propagation stage in Section 314 322 \ref{sec:resultsPropagation}. … … 334 342 335 343 \subsection{Inundation} 344 \label{sec:inundation data} 345 FIXME (Ole): Technically propagation covers everything up to 346 the coastline and inundation everything on-shore. 347 This means that ANUGA covers the final part of the propagation and the inundation part. Should we adopt this distiction throughout the paper? 348 336 349 Inundation refers to the final stages of the evolution of a tsunami and 337 covers the propagation of the tsunami in shallow coastal waterand the350 covers the propagation of the tsunami in coastal waters and the 338 351 subsequent run-up onto land. This process is typically the most 339 352 difficult of the three stages to model due to thin layers of water … … 343 356 data which is often not available. In the case of model validation 344 357 high quality field measurements are also required. For the proposed 345 benchmark the authors have obtained a high resolution bathymetryand358 benchmark a high resolution bathymetry (FIXME (Ole): Bathymetry ?) and 346 359 topography data set and a high quality inundation survey map from the 347 CCOP in Thailand (\cite{szczucinski06}) to validate model inundation. 348 349 The datasets necessary for reproducing the results 350 of the inundation stage are available on Sourceforge under the \textsc{anuga} 351 project (\url{http://sourceforge.net/projects/anuga}). At the time of 352 writing the direct link is \url{http://tinyurl.com/patong2004-data}. 353 % 354 %\url{http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=172848&package_id=319323&release_id=677531}. 355 356 In this section we also present eye-witness accounts which can be used to qualitatively validate tsunami inundation. 360 Coordinating Committee Co-ordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes 361 in East and Southeast Asia (CCOP) (\cite{szczucinski06}) was obtained 362 to validate model inundation. See also acknowledgements at the end of this paper. 363 364 In this section we also present eye-witness accounts which can be used 365 to qualitatively validate tsunami inundation. 357 366 358 367 \subsubsection{Topography Data} 359 368 A one second grid was used to approximate the topography in Patong 360 369 Bay. This elevation data was again created from the digitised Thai 361 Navy bathymetry chart, no 358. A visualisation of the elevation data 370 Navy bathymetry chart, no 358. 371 FIXME (Ole): I don't think so. The Navy chart is only offshore. 372 373 A visualisation of the elevation data 362 374 set used in Patong Bay is shown in 363 Figure~\ref{fig:patong_bathymetry}. The continuous topography is an 364 interpolation of known elevation measured at the coloured dots. 375 Figure~\ref{fig:patong_bathymetry}. The continuous topography 376 (FIXME(Jane): What is meant by this?) is an 377 interpolation of known elevation measured at the coloured dots. FIXME ?? 365 378 366 379 \begin{figure}[ht] 367 380 \begin{center} 368 381 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patong_bay_data.jpg} 369 \caption{ Visualisation of the elevation data set used in Patong Bay showing data points, contours, rivers and roads draped over the final model.}382 \caption{3D visualisation of the elevation data set used in Patong Bay showing data points, contours, rivers and roads draped over the final model.} 370 383 \label{fig:patong_bathymetry} 371 384 \end{center} 372 385 \end{figure} 386 FIXME (Jane): legend? Were the contours derived from the final dataset? 387 This is not the entire mode, only the bay and the beach. 373 388 374 389 \subsubsection{Buildings and Other Structures} 375 Human-made build and structures can significantly effect tsunami 376 inundation. The location and size and number of floors of the 377 buildings in Patong Bay were extracted from a GIS data set provided by 378 the CCOP in Thailand (see acknowledgements at the end of this paper). 390 Human-made buildings and structures can significantly affect tsunami 391 inundation. The footprint and number of floors of the 392 buildings in Patong Bay were extracted from a GIS data set which was also provided by the CCOP (see Section \ref{sec:inundation data} for details). 379 393 The heights of these 380 buildings were estimated assuming that each floor has a height of 3 m. 394 buildings were estimated assuming that each floor has a height of 3 m and they 395 were added to the topographic dataset. 381 396 382 397 \subsubsection{Inundation Survey} 383 Tsunami run-up is oftenthe cause of the largest financial and human398 Tsunami run-up is the cause of the largest financial and human 384 399 losses, yet run-up data that can be used to validate model run-up 385 predictions is scarce. Of the two field benchmarks proposed in~\cite{synolakis07}, 400 predictions is scarce. Of the two field benchmarks proposed 401 in~\cite{synolakis07}, 386 402 only the Okushiri benchmark facilitates comparison between 387 403 modelled and observed run-up. One of the major strengths of the … … 390 406 rather than at a series of discrete sites. The survey map is 391 407 shown in Figure~\ref{fig:patongescapemap} and plots the maximum run-up 392 of the 2004 tsunami in Patong Bay. Refer to Szczucinski et408 of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Patong city. Refer to Szczucinski et 393 409 al~\cite{szczucinski06} for further details. 410 411 \begin{figure}[ht] 412 \begin{center} 413 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patongescapemap.jpg} 414 \caption{Tsunami survey mapping the maximum observed inundation at 415 Patong beach courtesy of the CCOP \protect \cite{szczucinski06}.} 416 \label{fig:patongescapemap} 417 \end{center} 418 \end{figure} 419 394 420 395 421 \subsubsection{Eyewitness Accounts}\label{sec:eyewitness data} … … 402 428 minutes after the source rupture (09:55am to 10:05am local time). 403 429 404 Two videos were sourced from the internet\footnote{The footage is430 Two videos were sourced\footnote{The footage is 405 431 widely available and can for example be obtained from 406 432 \url{http://www.archive.org/download/patong_bavarian/patong_bavaria.wmv} … … 410 436 %http://wizbangblog.com/content/2005/01/01/wizbang-tsunami.php 411 437 which include footage of the tsunami in Patong Bay on the day 412 of the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Both videos show an already inundated438 of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Both videos show an already inundated 413 439 group of buildings. They also show what is to be assumed as the second 414 440 and third waves approaching and further flooding of the buildings and … … 438 464 were found to be in the range of 5 to 7 metres per second (+/- 2 m/s) 439 465 in the north and 0.5 to 2 metres per second (+/- 1 m/s) in the south. 466 FIXME (Jane): How were these error bounds derived? 440 467 Water depths could also 441 468 be estimated from the videos by the level at which water rose up the … … 446 473 speeds in the range of 2 to 5 m/s. 447 474 448 \begin{figure}[ht]449 \begin{center}450 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patongescapemap.jpg}451 \caption{Tsunami survey mapping the maximum observed inundation at452 Patong beach courtesy of the Thai Department of Mineral Resources453 \protect \cite{szczucinski06}.}454 \label{fig:patongescapemap}455 \end{center}456 \end{figure}457 475 458 476 \subsection{Validation Check-List} … … 465 483 \item reproduce the vertical deformation observed in north-western 466 484 Sumatra and along the Nicobar--Andaman islands (see 467 Section~\ref{sec:gen_data}) .485 Section~\ref{sec:gen_data}), 468 486 \item reproduce the \textsc{jason} satellite altimetry sea surface 469 anomalies (see Section~\ref{sec:data_jason}) .470 \item reproduce the inundation survey map in Patong bay471 (Figure~\ref{fig:patongescapemap}) .487 anomalies (see Section~\ref{sec:data_jason}), 488 \item reproduce the inundation survey map in Patong city 489 (Figure~\ref{fig:patongescapemap}), 472 490 \item simulate a leading depression followed by two distinct crests 473 of decreasing magnitude .491 of decreasing magnitude at the beach, and 474 492 \item predict the water depths and flow speeds, at the locations of 475 493 the eye-witness videos, that fall within the bounds obtained from … … 479 497 Ideally, the model should also be compared to measured timeseries of 480 498 waveheights and velocities but the authors are not aware of the 481 availability of such data .499 availability of such data near Patong Bay. 482 500 483 501 … … 493 511 494 512 There are various approaches to modelling the expected crustal 495 deformation from an earthquake at depth. Most approaches model the513 deformation from an earthquake. Most approaches model the 496 514 earthquake as a dislocation in a linear elastic medium. Here we use 497 515 the method of Wang et al~\cite{wang03}. One of the main advantages … … 509 527 using a combination of Hankel's transform and Wang et al's 510 528 implementation of the Thomson-Haskell propagator 511 algorithm~\cite{wang03}. Once the Green's functions are calculated we 512 use a slightly modified version of \textsc{edcmp} to calculate the sea 529 algorithm~\cite{wang03}. Once the Green's functions are calculated 530 a slightly modified version of \textsc{edcmp}\footnote{For this study, 531 we have made minor modifications 532 to \textsc{edcmp} in order for it to provide output in a file format 533 compatible with the propagation code in the following section. Otherwise it 534 is similar to the original code.} is used to calculate the sea 513 535 floor deformation for a specific subfault. This second code 514 536 discretises the subfault into a set of unit sources and sums the … … 517 539 deformation caused by a two dimensional dislocation along the 518 540 subfault. This step is possible because of the linearity of the 519 governing equations. For this study, we have made minor modifications 520 to \textsc{edcmp} in order for it to provide output in a file format 521 compatible with the propagation code in the following section. Otherwise it 522 is similar to the original code. 523 524 In order to calculate the crustal deformation using these codes we 525 need a model that describes the variation in elastic 541 governing equations. 542 543 In order to calculate the crustal deformation using these codes 544 a model that describes the variation in elastic 526 545 properties with depth and a slip model of the earthquake to describe 527 the dislocation. The elastic parameters used for this study are the 528 same as those in Table 2 of Burbidge~\cite{burbidge08}. For the slip 546 the dislocation is required. 547 The elastic parameters used for this study are the 548 same as those in Table 2 of Burbidge et al~\cite{burbidge08}. For the slip 529 549 model, there are many possible models for the 2004 Andaman--Sumatran 530 550 earthquake to select from … … 532 552 determined from various geological surveys of the site. Others solve 533 553 an inverse problem which calibrates the source based upon the tsunami 534 wave signal, the seismic signal and/or the run-up. The source 554 wave signal, the seismic signal and/or even the run-up. 555 The source 535 556 parameters used here to simulate the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami were 536 557 taken from the slip model G-M9.15 of Chlieh … … 550 571 551 572 \subsection{Propagation}\label{sec:modelPropagation} 552 We use the \textsc{ursga} model described belowto simulate the553 propagation of the 2004 tsunami in the deep ocean ocean, based on a573 The \textsc{ursga} model described below was used to simulate the 574 propagation of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami across the open ocean, based on a 554 575 discrete representation of the initial deformation of the sea floor, as 555 576 described in Section~\ref{sec:modelGeneration}. For the models shown 556 here, we assume that the uplift isinstantaneous and creates a wave of577 here, the uplift is assumed to be instantaneous and creates a wave of 557 578 the same size and amplitude as the co-seismic sea floor deformation. 558 579 … … 563 584 spherical co-ordinates with friction and Coriolis terms. The code is 564 585 based on Satake~\cite{satake95} with significant modifications made by 565 the \textsc{urs} corporation~\cite{thio08} and Geoscience 566 Australia~\cite{burbidge08}. The tsunami is propagated via the nested 567 grid system. Coarse grids are used in the open ocean and the finest 568 resolution grid is employed in the region of most 569 interest. \textsc{Ursga} is not publicly available. 586 the \textsc{urs} corporation, Thio et al~\cite{thio08} and Geoscience 587 Australia, Burbidge et al~\cite{burbidge08}. 588 The tsunami was propagated via the nested 589 grid system described in Section \ref{sec:propagation data} where 590 the coarse grids were used in the open ocean and the finest 591 resolution grid was employed in the region closest to Patong bay. 592 \textsc{Ursga} is not publicly available. 570 593 571 594 \subsection{Inundation}\label{sec:modelInundation} … … 578 601 Geoscience Australia tsunami modelling methodology is based on a 579 602 hybrid approach using models like \textsc{ursga} for tsunami 580 propagation up to a 100 m depth contour.603 propagation up to an offshore depth contour, typically 100 m. 581 604 %Specifically we use the \textsc{ursga} model to simulate the 582 605 %propagation of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in the deep ocean, based 583 606 %on a discrete representation of the initial deformation of the sea 584 607 %floor, described in Section~\ref{sec:modelGeneration}. 585 The wave signal is then used as a time varying boundary condition for 608 The wave signal and the velocity field is then used as a 609 time varying boundary condition for 586 610 the \textsc{anuga} inundation simulation. 587 611 % A description of \textsc{anuga} is the following section. 588 612 589 613 \subsubsection{ANUGA} 590 \textsc{Anuga} is a nOpen Source hydrodynamic inundation tool that614 \textsc{Anuga} is a Free and Open Source hydrodynamic inundation tool that 591 615 solves the conserved form of the depth-integrated nonlinear shallow 592 water wave equations. The scheme used by \textsc{anuga}, first 616 water wave equations using a Finite-Volume scheme on an 617 unstructured triangular mesh. 618 The scheme, first 593 619 presented by Zoppou and Roberts~\cite{zoppou99}, is a high-resolution 594 620 Godunov-type method that uses the rotational invariance property of … … 598 624 et al~\cite{kurganov01} for solving one-dimensional conservation 599 625 equations. The numerical scheme is presented in detail in 600 Roberts and Zoppou~\cite{zoppou 99,roberts00} and626 Roberts and Zoppou~\cite{zoppou00,roberts00} and 601 627 Nielsen et al~\cite{nielsen05}. An important capability of the 602 software is that it can model the process of wetting and drying as 603 water enters and leaves an area. This means that it is suitable for 628 finite-volume scheme is that discontinuities in all conserved quantities 629 are allowed at every edge in the mesh. This means that the tool is 630 well suited to adequately resolving hydraulic jumps, transcritical flows and 631 the process of wetting and drying. This means that \textsc{Anuga} 632 is suitable for 604 633 simulating water flow onto a beach or dry land and around structures 605 such as buildings. It is also capable of adequately resolving 606 hydraulic jumps due to the ability of the finite-volume method to 607 handle discontinuities. The numerical scheme can also handle 608 transitions between sub-critical and super-critical flow regimes 609 seamlessly. \textsc{Anuga} has been validated against a number of 610 analytical solutions and the wave tank simulation of the 1993 Okushiri 634 such as buildings. \textsc{Anuga} has been validated against 635 %a number of analytical solutions and FIXME: These have not been published 636 the wave tank simulation of the 1993 Okushiri 611 637 Island tsunami~\cite{nielsen05,roberts06}. 638 FIXME (Ole): Add reference to Tom Baldock's Dam Break valiadation of ANUGA. 639 612 640 613 641 %================Section=========================== … … 629 657 (arrows point down) during and immediately after the earthquake. Most 630 658 of this data comes from uplifted or subsided coral heads. The length of 631 vector increases with the magnitude of the displacement; the length659 the vector increases with the magnitude of the displacement; the length 632 660 corresponding to 1 m of observed motion is shown in the top right 633 661 corner of the figure. As can be seen, the source model detailed in … … 642 670 points) is only 0.06 m, well below the typical error of the 643 671 observations of between 0.25 and 1.0 m. However, the occasional point 644 has quite a large error (over 1 m); for example a couple 645 uplifted/subsided points appear to be on a wrong side of the predicted 672 has quite a large error (over 1 m); for example a couple of 673 uplifted/subsided points appear to be on a wrong 674 (FIXME (Jane): This is incorrect) side of the predicted 646 675 pivot line~\ref{fig:surface_deformation}. The excellence of the fit is 647 676 not surprising, since the original slip model was chosen 648 677 by~\cite{chlieh07} to fit this (and the seismic data) well. 649 678 This does demonstrate, however, that \textsc{edgrn} and our modified version of 650 \textsc{edstat} can reproduce the correct pattern of vertical 679 \textsc{edstat} (FIXME(Jane): This has never been mentioned before) 680 can reproduce the correct pattern of vertical 651 681 deformation very well when the slip distribution is well constrained 652 682 and when reasonable values for the elastic properties are used. … … 665 695 hand corner of the figure. The cross marks show the location of 666 696 the pivot line (the region between the uplift and subsided region 667 where the uplift is zero) derived from remote sensing. All the 697 where the uplift is zero) derived from remote sensing 698 (FIXME(Jane): How was that possible?). All the 668 699 observational data are from the dataset collated 669 700 by~\cite{chlieh07}.} … … 686 717 shown in Figure~\ref{fig:computational_domain}. 687 718 719 \begin{figure}[ht] 720 \begin{center} 721 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ursga_model.jpg} 722 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{ursgaDomain.jpg} 723 \includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ANUGA_model.jpg} 724 \caption{Computational domain of the \textsc{ursga} simulation (inset: white and black squares and main: black square) and the \textsc{anuga} simulation (main and inset: red polygon).} 725 \label{fig:computational_domain} 726 \end{center} 727 \end{figure} 728 729 688 730 Figure \ref{fig:jasonComparison} provides a comparison of the 689 \textsc{ursga}-predicted sea surface elevation with the JASON731 \textsc{ursga}-predicted sea surface elevation with the \textsc{jason} 690 732 satellite altimetry data. The \textsc{ursga} model replicates the 691 733 amplitude and timing of the the wave observed at $2.5^0$ South, … … 696 738 as can be seen in the satellite data. Also note 697 739 that the \textsc{ursga} model prediction of the ocean surface 698 elevation becomes out of phase with the JASON data at $3^0$ to $7^0$ North 740 elevation becomes out of phase with the \textsc{jason} 741 data at $3^0$ to $7^0$ North 699 742 latitude. Chlieh et al~\cite{chlieh07} also observed these misfits and 700 743 suggest it is caused by a reflected wave from the Aceh Peninsula that 701 744 is not resolved in the model due to insufficient resolution of the 702 745 computational mesh and bathymetry data. This is also a limitation of 703 the model presented here , but probablycould be improved by nesting746 the model presented here which could be improved by nesting 704 747 grids near Aceh. 705 748 … … 708 751 \includegraphics[width=12.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{jasonComparison.jpg} 709 752 \caption{Comparison of the \textsc{ursga}-predicted surface elevation 710 with the JASONsatellite altimetry data. The \textsc{ursga} wave753 with the \textsc{jason} satellite altimetry data. The \textsc{ursga} wave 711 754 heights have been corrected for the time the satellite passed 712 overhead compared to JASONsea level anomaly.}755 overhead compared to \textsc{jason} sea level anomaly.} 713 756 \label{fig:jasonComparison} 714 757 \end{center} 715 758 \end{figure} 759 FIXME (Jane): This graph does not look nice. The legend URS Model should 760 be URSGA model. 716 761 717 762 \subsection{Inundation} 718 763 After propagating the tsunami in the open ocean using \textsc{ursga}, 719 764 the approximated ocean and surface elevation and horisontal flow 720 velocities were extracted and used to construct a boundary condition 765 velocities were extracted and used to construct a boundary condition 721 766 for the \textsc{anuga} model. The interface between the \textsc{ursga} 722 and \textsc{anuga} models was chosen to roughly follow the 100 767 and \textsc{anuga} models was chosen to roughly follow the 100~m depth 723 768 contour along the west coast of Phuket Island. The computational 724 769 domain is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:computational_domain}. 725 \begin{figure}[ht]726 \begin{center}727 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ursga_model.jpg}728 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{ursgaDomain.jpg}729 \includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ANUGA_model.jpg}730 \caption{Computational domain of the URSGA simulation (inset: white and black squares and main: black square) and the \textsc{anuga} simulation (main and inset: red polygon).}731 \label{fig:computational_domain}732 \end{center}733 \end{figure}734 770 735 771 The domain was discretised into 386,338 triangles. The resolution of 736 the grid was increased in certain regions to efficiently increase the 737 accuracy of the simulation. The grid resolution ranged between a 738 maximum triangle area of $1\times 10^5$ m$^2$ near the Western ocean 772 the grid was increased in regions inside the bay and on-shore to 773 efficiently increase the simulation accuracy for the impact area. 774 The grid resolution ranged between a 775 maximum triangle area of $1\times 10^5$ m$^2$ near the western ocean 739 776 boundary to $20$ m$^2$ in the small regions surrounding the inundation 740 777 region in Patong Bay. Due to a lack of available data, friction was 741 778 set to a constant throughout the computational domain. For the 742 reference simulation a Manning's coefficient of 0.01 was chosen to779 reference simulation, a Manning's coefficient of 0.01 was chosen to 743 780 represent a small resistance to the water flow. See Section 744 781 \ref{sec:friction sensitivity} for details on model sensitivity to … … 747 784 748 785 The boundary condition at each side of the domain towards the south 749 and the north where no data was available was chosen as a transmissive 786 and the north where no information about the incident wave or 787 its velocity field is available 788 was chosen as a transmissive 750 789 boundary condition, effectively replicating the time dependent wave 751 height present just inside the computational domain. Momentum was set 790 height present just inside the computational domain. 791 The velocity field on these boundaries was set 752 792 to zero. Other choices include applying the mean tide value as a 753 Dirichlet typeboundary condition. But experiments as well as the793 Dirichlet boundary condition. But experiments as well as the 754 794 result of the verification reported here showed that this approach 755 795 tends to underestimate the tsunami impact due to the tempering of the … … 761 801 specified by the Thai Navy tide charts 762 802 (\url{http://www.navy.mi.th/hydro/}) at the time the tsunami arrived 763 at Patong Bay. Although the tsunami propagated for approximately 3803 at Patong Bay. Although the tsunami propagated for approximately three 764 804 hours before it reach Patong Bay, the period of time during which the 765 805 wave propagated through the \textsc{anuga} domain is much … … 767 807 reasonable. 768 808 769 Maximum onshore inundation elevationwas computed from the model809 Maximum onshore inundation depth was computed from the model 770 810 throughout the entire Patong Bay region. 771 811 Figure~\ref{fig:inundationcomparison1cm} (left) shows very good … … 790 830 791 831 832 The datasets necessary for reproducing the results 833 of the inundation stage are available on Sourceforge under the \textsc{anuga} 834 project (\url{http://sourceforge.net/projects/anuga}). 835 At the time of 836 writing the direct link is \url{http://tinyurl.com/patong2004-data}. 837 %%\url{http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=172848&package_id=319323&release_id=677531}. 838 The scripts required are part of the \textsc{anuga} distribution also 839 available from Sourceforge \url{http://sourceforge.net/projects/anuga} under 840 the validation section. 841 792 842 An animation of this simulation is available on the \textsc{anuga} website at \url{https://datamining.anu.edu.au/anuga} or directly from \url{http://tinyurl.com/patong2004}. 793 794 843 %\url{https://datamining.anu.edu.au/anuga/attachment/wiki/AnugaPublications/patong_2004_indian_ocean_tsunami_ANUGA_animation.mov}. 795 844 … … 826 875 parameterisation of the source model, effect of humans structures on 827 876 flow, as well as uncertainties in the elevation data, effects of 828 erosion and deposition by the tsunami event, measurement errors, and 877 erosion and deposition by the tsunami event, 878 measurement errors in the GPS survey recordings, and 829 879 missing data in the field survey data itself. The impact of some of 830 880 these sources of uncertainties are is investigated in … … 852 902 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_depth.jpg} 853 903 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_speed.jpg} 854 \caption{Time series obtained from the two offshore locations shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.} 904 \caption{Time series obtained from the two offshore gauge locations, 905 7C and 10C, shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.} 855 906 \end{center} 856 907 \label{fig:offshore_timeseries} … … 861 912 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_depths.jpg} 862 913 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_speed.jpg} 863 \caption{Time series obtained from the two onshore locations shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.} 914 \caption{Time series obtained from the two onshore locations, North and South, 915 shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.} 864 916 \end{center} 865 917 \label{fig:onshore_timeseries} … … 867 919 868 920 869 The estimated maxdepths and flow rates given in Section921 The estimated depths and flow rates given in Section 870 922 \ref{sec:eyewitness data} are shown together with the modelled depths 871 923 and flow rates obtained from the model in Table \ref{tab:depth and … … 891 943 \label{tab:depth and flow comparisons} 892 944 \end{table} 945 FIXME (Jane): We should perhaps look at average data in area surrounding these points 893 946 894 947 %can be estimated with landmarks found in … … 921 974 model maximum inundation. The reference model is the one reported in 922 975 Figure~\ref{fig:inundationcomparison1cm} (right) with a friction coefficient of 0.01, 923 buildings included and the boundary condition produced by the URSGA model. 976 buildings included and the boundary condition produced by the 977 \textsc{ursga} model. 924 978 925 979 %========================Friction==========================% 926 980 \subsection{Friction} 927 981 \label{sec:friction sensitivity} 928 The first s tudy investigated the impact of surface roughness on the982 The first sensitivity study investigated the impact of surface roughness on the 929 983 predicted run-up. According to Schoettle~\cite{schoettle2007} 930 984 appropriate values of Manning's coefficient range from 0.007 to 0.03 … … 949 1003 severity is directly proportional to the boundary waveheight but small 950 1004 perturbations in the input wave height of 10 cm appear to have little 951 effect on the final on-shore run-up. Obviously larger perturbations 952 will have greater impact. However, this value is generally well 1005 effect on the final inundated area. Obviously larger perturbations 1006 will have greater impact. However, wave heights in the open ocean are 1007 generally well 953 1008 predicted by the generation and propagation models such as 954 \textsc{ursga}. See e.g.\ \cite{thomas2009}. 1009 \textsc{ursga} as demonstrated in Section \ref{sec:resultsPropagation} 1010 and also in \cite{thomas2009}. 955 1011 956 1012 … … 958 1014 %========================Buildings==========================% 959 1015 \subsection{Buildings and Other Structures} 960 The presence of buildings has the greatest influence on the maximum 961 on-shore inundation extent. Figure~\ref{fig:sensitivity_nobuildings} 962 shows the maximum run-up and associated flow speeds in the presence and absence of buildings. It 963 is apparent that the inundation is much more severe when the presence 964 of human made structures and buildings are ignored. 1016 The presence or absence of physical buildings in the elevation model was also 1017 investigated. 1018 Figure~\ref{fig:sensitivity_nobuildings} 1019 shows the inundated area and the associated maximum flow speeds 1020 in the presence and absence of buildings. It 1021 is apparent that densely built-up areas act as 1022 dissipators greatly reducing the inundated area. However, flow speeds 1023 tend to increase in passages between buildings. 1024 965 1025 966 1026 \begin{table} … … 1001 1061 1002 1062 This study also shows that the tsunami impact modelling methodology 1003 adopted is sane and able to predict inundation extents with reasonable1063 adopted is credible and able to predict inundation extents with reasonable 1004 1064 accuracy. An associated aim of this paper was to further validate the 1005 1065 hydrodynamic modelling tool \textsc{anuga} which is used to simulate 1006 the tsunami inundation and run rain-induced floods. Model predictions1007 matched well geodetic measurements of the Sumatra--Andaman earthquake,1066 the tsunami inundation. Model predictions 1067 matched well the geodetic measurements of the Sumatra--Andaman earthquake, 1008 1068 altimetry data from the \textsc{jason}, eye-witness accounts of wave 1009 1069 front arrival times and flow speeds and a detailed inundation survey … … 1013 1073 small changes in friction, wave height at the 100 m depth contour and 1014 1074 the presence of buildings and other structures on the model 1015 predictions. The presence of buildings has the greatest influence on 1075 predictions. Of these three, the presence of buildings was shown to 1076 have the greatest influence on 1016 1077 the simulated inundation extent. The value of friction and small 1017 1078 perturbations in the waveheight at the \textsc{anuga} boundary have … … 1022 1083 This project was undertaken at Geoscience Australia and the Department 1023 1084 of Mathematics, The Australian National University. The authors would 1024 like to thank Niran Chaimanee from the CCOP , Thailandfor providing1085 like to thank Niran Chaimanee from the CCOP for providing 1025 1086 the post 2004 tsunami survey data, building footprints, aerial 1026 photography and the elevation data for Patong beach, Prapasri Asawakun1087 photography and the elevation data for Patong city, Prapasri Asawakun 1027 1088 from the Suranaree University of Technology and Parida Kuneepong for 1028 1089 supporting this work; and Drew Whitehouse from the Australian National 1029 University for preparing the animation of the inundation model.1090 University for preparing the animation of the simulated impact. 1030 1091 1031 1092 \clearpage … … 1041 1102 \caption{Results from reference model as reported in Section \protect \ref{sec:results}, 1042 1103 i.e.\ including buildings and a friction value of 0.01. The seaward boundary condition is as 1043 provided by the URSGAmodel. The left image shows the maximum1104 provided by the \textsc{ursga} model. The left image shows the maximum 1044 1105 modelled depth while the right hand image shows the maximum modelled 1045 1106 flow velocities.} … … 1058 1119 \protect \ref{fig:reference_model} (left). The left and right images 1059 1120 show the inundation results if the wave at the \textsc{anuga} boundary 1060 is reduced or increased by 10 cm respectively. The inundation1121 is reduced or increased by 10 cm respectively. The inundation 1061 1122 severity varies in proportion to the boundary waveheight, but the 1062 1123 model results are only slightly sensitive to this parameter for the … … 1065 1126 \end{center} 1066 1127 \end{figure} 1128 FIXME (Jane): How and why was the +/- 10 cm chosen? 1067 1129 1068 1130 … … 1083 1145 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_depth} 1084 1146 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_speed} 1085 \caption{ This figure shows the effect of having buildings as part of1147 \caption{Model results show the effect of buildings in 1086 1148 the elevation data set. 1087 The left hand image shows the inundation depth results for1149 The left hand image shows the maximum inundation depth results for 1088 1150 a model entirely without buildings. As expected, the absence of 1089 1151 buildings will increase the inundation extent beyond what was
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.