Changeset 7408


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 26, 2009, 10:16:42 AM (11 years ago)
Author:
ole
Message:

Flagged FIXMEs that relate to Richard's work with: Search for RICHARD

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • anuga_work/publications/boxing_day_validation_2008/patong_validation.tex

    r7405 r7408  
    277277  bathymetry chart, no. 358, which covers Patong Bay and the
    278278  immediately adjacent regions.
    279   (FIXME (Ole): How was the grid created from these digitised points?)
     279  (FIXME (Ole): How was the grid created from these digitised points?) RICHARD
    280280\end{itemize}
    281 FIXME (Jane): Refs for all these.
     281FIXME (Jane): Refs for all these. RICHARD
    282282
    283283%A number of raw data sets were obtained, analysed and checked for
     
    295295arc grid. A subsection of this region was then replaced by nine second
    296296data which was generated by sub-sampling the three second of arc grid from
    297 NOAA (FIXME (Jane): This was not mentioned in the dots above).
     297NOAA (FIXME (Jane): This was not mentioned in the dots above). RICHARD
    298298
    299299A subset of the nine second grid was replaced by the three second
     
    315315\begin{figure}[ht]
    316316\begin{center}
    317 \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{nested_grids}
     317\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{nested_grids}
    318318\caption{Nested bathymetry grids.}
    319319\label{fig:nested_grids}
     
    367367data which is often not available. In the case of model validation
    368368high quality field measurements are also required. For the proposed
    369 benchmark a high resolution bathymetry (FIXME (Ole): Bathymetry ?) and
     369benchmark a high resolution bathymetry (FIXME (Ole): Bathymetry ? - RICHARD) and
    370370topography data set and a high quality inundation survey map from the
    371371Coordinating Committee Co-ordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes
     
    380380Bay. This elevation data was again created from the digitised Thai
    381381Navy bathymetry chart, no 358.
    382 FIXME (Ole): I don't think so. The Navy chart is only offshore.
     382FIXME (Ole): I don't think so. The Navy chart is only offshore. RICHARD
    383383
    384384 A visualisation of the elevation data
     
    386386Figure~\ref{fig:patong_bathymetry}. The continuous topography
    387387(FIXME(Jane): What is meant by this?) is an
    388 interpolation of known elevation measured at the coloured dots. FIXME ??
    389 
    390 \begin{figure}[ht]
    391 \begin{center}
    392 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patong_bay_data.jpg}
     388interpolation of known elevation measured at the coloured dots. FIXME RICHARD
     389
     390\begin{figure}[ht]
     391\begin{center}
     392\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{patong_bay_data.jpg}
    393393\caption{3D visualisation of the elevation data set used in Patong Bay showing data points, contours, rivers and roads draped over the final model.}
    394394\label{fig:patong_bathymetry}
     
    396396\end{figure}
    397397FIXME (Jane): legend? Were the contours derived from the final dataset?
    398 This is not the entire model, only the bay and the beach.
     398This is not the entire model, only the bay and the beach. RICHARD
    399399
    400400\subsubsection{Buildings and Other Structures}
     
    423423\begin{figure}[ht]
    424424\begin{center}
    425 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patongescapemap.jpg}
     425%\includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{patongescapemap.jpg}
     426\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{post_tsunami_survey.jpg}
    426427\caption{Tsunami survey mapping the maximum observed inundation at
    427428  Patong beach courtesy of the CCOP \protect \cite{szczucinski06}.}
     
    446447\begin{figure}[ht]
    447448\begin{center}
    448 \includegraphics[width=8.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_locations.jpg}
     449\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges.jpg}
    449450\caption{Location of timeseries extracted from the model output.}
    450451\label{fig:gauge_locations}
     
    492493were found to be in the range of 5 to 7 metres per second (+/- 2 m/s)
    493494in the north and 0.5 to 2 metres per second (+/- 1 m/s) in the south.
    494 FIXME (Jane): How were these error bounds derived?
     495FIXME (Jane): How were these error bounds derived? RICHARD
    495496Water depths could also
    496497be estimated from the videos by the level at which water rose up the
     
    714715\begin{figure}[ht]
    715716\begin{center}
    716 \includegraphics[width=5cm,keepaspectratio=true]{surface_deformation.jpg}
     717\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{surface_deformation.jpg}
    717718%\includegraphics[totalheight=0.3\textheight,width=0.8\textwidth]{surface_deformation.jpg}
    718719\caption{Location and magnitude of the vertical component of the sea
     
    751752were coupled, I didn't think nested grids were used with URSGA -
    752753and certainly not down to 1 arc second. Can someone shed some light
    753 on this please?
    754 
    755 \begin{figure}[ht]
    756 \begin{center}
    757 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ursga_model.jpg}
    758 %\includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{ursgaDomain.jpg}
    759 \includegraphics[width=5.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ANUGA_model.jpg}
     754on this please? RICHARD
     755
     756\begin{figure}[ht]
     757\begin{center}
     758\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{extent_of_ANUGA_model.jpg}
    760759\caption{Computational domain of the \textsc{ursga} simulation (inset: white and black squares and main: black square) and the \textsc{anuga} simulation (main and inset: red polygon).}
    761760\label{fig:computational_domain}
     
    785784\begin{figure}[ht]
    786785\begin{center}
    787 \includegraphics[width=12.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{jasonComparison.jpg}
     786\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{jasonComparison.jpg}
    788787\caption{Comparison of the \textsc{ursga}-predicted surface elevation
    789788  with the \textsc{jason} satellite altimetry data. The \textsc{ursga} wave
     
    817816region in Patong Bay. The coarse resolution was chosen to be
    818817commensurate with the model output from the \textsc{ursga} model
    819 (FIXME - this has to be clearly stated in ursga section)
     818(FIXME - this has to be clearly stated in ursga section) RICHARD
    820819while the latter was chosen to match the available resolution of topographic
    821820data and building data in Patong city.
     
    891890\begin{figure}[ht]
    892891\begin{center}
    893 \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{final_1cm.jpg}
    894 \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{final_10cm.jpg}
     892%\includegraphics[width=6.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{final_1cm.jpg}
     893%\includegraphics[width=6.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{final_10cm.jpg}
     894\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{threshold.jpg}
    895895\caption{Simulated inundation versus observed inundation using an
    896896inundation threshold of 1cm (left) and 10cm (right).}
     
    937937\begin{figure}[ht]
    938938\begin{center}
    939 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_depth.jpg}
    940 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_speed.jpg}
     939\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_depth.jpg}
     940\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{gauge_bay_speed.jpg}
    941941\caption{Time series obtained from the two offshore gauge locations,
    9429427C and 10C, shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.}
     
    947947\begin{figure}[ht]
    948948\begin{center}
    949 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_depths.jpg}
    950 \includegraphics[width=10.0cm,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_speed.jpg}
     949\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_depths.jpg}
     950\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{gauges_hotels_speed.jpg}
    951951\caption{Time series obtained from the two onshore locations, North and South,
    952952shown in Figure \protect \ref{fig:gauge_locations}.}
     
    11331133\section{Appendix}
    11341134
    1135 This appendix present the images used to assess the model sensitivities described in
     1135This appendix present the images used to assess the model
     1136sensitivities described in
    11361137Section~\ref{sec:sensitivity}.
    11371138
    11381139\begin{figure}[ht]
    11391140\begin{center}
    1140 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_reference_depth}
    1141 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_reference_speed}
    1142 \caption{Results from reference model as reported in Section \protect \ref{sec:results},
    1143   i.e.\ including buildings and a friction value of 0.01. The seaward boundary condition is as
     1141%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_reference_depth}
     1142%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_reference_speed}
     1143\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{reference}
     1144\caption{Results from reference model as reported in Section
     1145\protect \ref{sec:results},
     1146  i.e.\ including buildings and a friction value of 0.01.
     1147  The seaward boundary condition is as
    11441148  provided by the \textsc{ursga} model. The left image shows the maximum
    11451149  modelled depth while the right hand image shows the maximum modelled
     
    11531157\begin{figure}[ht]
    11541158\begin{center}
    1155 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_minus10cm_depth}
    1156 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_plus10cm_depth}
     1159%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_minus10cm_depth}
     1160%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_plus10cm_depth}
     1161\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_boundary_wave}
    11571162\caption{Model results with wave height at \textsc{anuga} boundary artificially
    1158   modified to assess sensitivities. The reference inundation extent is shown in Figure
     1163  modified to assess sensitivities.
     1164  The reference inundation extent is shown in Figure
    11591165  \protect \ref{fig:reference_model} (left).  The left and right images
    11601166  show the inundation results if the wave at the \textsc{anuga} boundary
     
    11831189\begin{figure}[ht]
    11841190\begin{center}
    1185 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_depth}
    1186 \includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_speed}
     1191%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_depth}
     1192%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_nobuildings_speed}
     1193\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_buildings}
    11871194\caption{Model results show the effect of buildings in
    11881195  the elevation data set.
    1189   The left hand image shows the maximum inundation depth results for
    1190   a model entirely without buildings.  As expected, the absence of
     1196  The left hand image shows the inundation extent as modelled in the reference
     1197  model (Figure \protect \ref{fig:reference_model}.})
     1198  which includes buildings in the elevation data. The right hand image
     1199  shows the result for a bare-earth model i.e. entirely without buildings. 
     1200  As expected, the absence of
    11911201  buildings will increase the inundation extent beyond what was
    1192   surveyed. The right hand image shows the corresponding flow speeds in the absence of buildings. 
    1193   The reference results are as shown in Figure
    1194   \protect \ref{fig:reference_model}.}
     1202  surveyed.
     1203 
     1204  % FIXME (Ole): Include speed picture elsewhere
     1205  %The right hand image shows the corresponding flow speeds in the absence of buildings. 
     1206  %The reference results are as shown in Figure
     1207  %\protect \ref{fig:reference_model}.}
    11951208\label{fig:sensitivity_nobuildings}
    11961209\end{center}
     
    12021215%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_f0_0003_depth}
    12031216%\includegraphics[width=6cm,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_f0_03_depth}
    1204 \includegraphics[width=12cm,keepaspectratio=true]{friction_comparison_depth}
     1217\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{sensitivity_friction}
    12051218\caption{Model results for different values of Manning's friction
    1206   coefficient shown to assess sensitivities. The reference inundation extent for a
     1219  coefficient shown to assess sensitivities.
     1220  The reference inundation extent for a
    12071221  friction value of 0.01 is shown in Figure
    12081222  \protect \ref{fig:reference_model} (left).  The left and right images
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.