Changeset 7473 for anuga_work/publications/boxing_day_validation_2008/results.tex

Timestamp:

Sep 3, 2009, 2:04:19 PM (15 years ago)

Author:

ole

Message:

Updated data section with more info from Richard and the generation section with input from David

File:

• anuga_work/publications/boxing_day_validation_2008/results.tex (modified) (4 diffs)

anuga_work/publications/boxing_day_validation_2008/results.tex

@@ -51 +51 @@
   hand corner of the figure. The cross marks show the location of
   the pivot line (the region between the uplift and subsided region
-  where the uplift is zero) derived from remote sensing 
-  (FIXME(Jane): How was that possible?). All the
+  where the uplift is zero) derived from remote sensing of where there
+  were no changes in the amount of reef or land exposure before and after
+the earthquake (\cite{meltzner06}). All the
   observational data are from the dataset collated
   by~\cite{chlieh07}.}
@@ -69 +70 @@
 sequence of grids was used. The grid resolution of the nested grids
 went from 27 arc seconds in the coarsest grid, down to nine arc seconds
-in the second grid, three arc seconds in the third grid and finally one arc
-second in the finest grid near Patong. The computational domain is
+in the second grid and three arc seconds in the third grid. The computational domain is
 shown in Figure~\ref{fig:computational_domain}.
 
@@ -118 +118 @@
 for the \textsc{anuga} model. The interface between the \textsc{ursga}
 and \textsc{anuga} models was chosen to roughly follow the 100~m depth
-contour along the west coast of Phuket Island. The computational
+contour along the west coast of Phuket Island. Data from the 
+3 second grid was decimated to match the resolution chosen in ANUGA. 
+The computational
 domain is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:computational_domain}.
 
@@ -133 +135 @@
 region in Patong Bay. The coarse resolution was chosen to be 
 commensurate with the model output from the \textsc{ursga} model (FIXME (Ole): Richard says that the ursga model used all four grids which would mean that the
-resolution at the ANUGA boundary was 1 second or about 30m.
+resolution at the ANUGA boundary was 1 second or about 30 m.
 This is not consistent with my memory and certainly not with us choosing a
-resolution of 440m. John, do you remember what the spacing was between the
+resolution of 440 m. John, do you remember what the spacing was between the
 URSGA points? Did we weed them out or did we take them as they were?)