Changeset 9371

Timestamp:

Nov 26, 2014, 10:05:47 AM (10 years ago)

Author:

davies

Message:

Fixing documentation errors in validation test

Location:

trunk/anuga_core/validation_tests/analytical_exact/supercritical_over_bump

Files:

• report.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• results.tex (modified) (2 diffs)

trunk/anuga_core/validation_tests/analytical_exact/supercritical_over_bump/report.tex

@@ -16 +16 @@
 %=========================================
 
-\title{Automated Report on the Performance of \anuga{} on the Steady State of Moving Water with an Immersed Bump:\\Subcritical Flow without a Shock}
+\title{Automated Report on the Performance of \anuga{} on the Steady State of Moving Water with an Immersed Bump:\\Supercritical Flow without a Shock}
 \maketitle
 %\tableofcontents

trunk/anuga_core/validation_tests/analytical_exact/supercritical_over_bump/results.tex

@@ -1 +1 @@
 
-\section{Subcritical flow without a shock over a bump}
+\section{Supercritical flow without a shock over a bump}
 
-This is a subcritical flow over a bump. This test is adapted from Goutal and Maurel~\cite{GM1997}. No shock occurs in this scenario. 
+This is a supercritical flow over a bump. This test is adapted from Goutal and Maurel~\cite{GM1997}. No shock occurs in this scenario. 
 
 Consider a one dimensional domain $[0,25]$ with topography
@@ -25 +25 @@
 \begin{equation}
 u(x,y,0)=v(x,y,0)=0\,, \quad
-w(x,y,0)= 0.2\,,
+w(x,y,0)= 2\,,
 \end{equation}
 and the Dirichlet boundary conditions at $x=0^{-}$ and $25^{+}$ to be 
 \begin{equation}
-[w,hu,hv]=[2, 4.42, 0]\,.
+[w,hu,hv]=[0.5, 10., 0]\,.
 \end{equation}
 Representatives of the simulation results are given in the following three figures. Even though we have small discrepancy in the numerical and analytical momenta, these numerical an analytical solutions should agree quite well.