
The modelling has considered three separate regions based on the location
of the potential slide failures. The regions A, B and C refer
to Wollongong, Sydney and Newcastle. Figure \ref{fig:overallmodel} shows
each model with respect to each other and highlights the location
of the slides modelled in this study. See Appendix \ref{sec:anugasetup}
for the detailed inundation modelling setup for each study region.

\begin{figure}[h]
\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{../report_figures/overallmodel.jpg}}
\caption{NSW region showing the location of each study region and the location
of the origin of the slide.}
\label{fig:overallmodel}
\end{figure}

The purpose of this section is show the maximum inundation map for each
slide scenario for region A, B and C. The Bulli slide is considered to
have occurred with the Shovel and Yacaaba considered as potential slides.
The modelling effectively describes the output as a function of slide
volume with Bulli the largest. The outputs should thus be interpretted
as potential outputs with the Bulli volume occurring in region A as the 
only to have occurred. This event may be used in paleo-tsunami 
investigations due to occur in early 2007. The remaining events may
then be used to described the potential tsunami inundation for slides 
of varied volume.

The time to impact after the initiation of the slide is approximately 25 mins 
for region A and B and approximately 35 mins for region C. See Appendix \ref{sec:timeseries}
for time series outputs at Fairy Meadow (for region A), Manly Beach (for region B) and 
Stockton Beach (for region C).

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}

\caption{Parameters used in ANUGA for the the submarine mass failure scenarios.}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
{\bf Parameter} & {\bf Bulli} & {\bf Shovel} & {\bf Yacaaba }\\ \hline
Length (m) & 16840  & 13500  & 7050  \\ \hline
Width (m) & 8860   & 4350  & 3080  \\ \hline
Thickness (m) & 424  & 165  & 144  \\ \hline
Density g m$^{-3}$ & 1.46  & 1.49  & 1.48  \\ \hline
Water depth to centre of mass (m) & 2087  & 968  & 1119  \\ \hline
Bathymetric slope (\degree) & 4  & 4  & 3  \\ \hline
Angular orientation (\degree) & 126 & 118  & 133  \\ \hline
\end{tabular}

\end{center}
\end{table}



Figures \ref{fig:bulliA}, \ref{fig:bulliB} and \ref{fig:bulliC}
describe the inundation extent to regions A, B and C respectively
for the Bulli volume. Similarly, Figures \ref{fig:shovelA}, \ref{fig:shovelB}
and \ref{fig:shovelC} describe the inundation extent for the Shovel
volume with Figures \ref{fig:yacaabaA}, \ref{fig:yacaabaB} and 
\ref{fig:yacaabaC} describing the inundation extent for the Yacaaba volume.
It is immediately apparent that there is little difference in the
inundation extents between the Bulli and Shovel slide volumes.  The reason
for this may possibly be explained in Figure \ref{fig:depthvsamp}. Here, the 
characteristic three dimensional 
amplitude is determined as a function of depth for each
slide volume (see Appendix \ref{sec:smfmodel} for details) 
with the location of each specific slide marked on its
corresponding volume. 
As Figure \ref{fig:depthvsamp} shows, even though the Bulli and Shovel
slides are considered to occur in different depths of water, the
resultant amplitude are approximately equal.

\begin{figure}[h]
\centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{../report_figures/depthvsampdataslide.png}}
\caption{Relationship between characteristic 3D amplitude and depth
for each slide volume.}
\label{fig:depthvsamp}
\end{figure}
