The calculated run-up height and resulting inundation ashore is controlled by
the input topographic and bathymetric elevation, the
initial and boundary conditions, as well as the cell area of the computational
mesh. 
Ideally, the topographic and bathymetric data
should adequately capture all complex features
of the underlying bathymetry and topography. Any limitations
in the resolution and accuracy of the data will introduce 
errors to the inundation maps, in addition to the range of approximations
made within the model.

In this study, we used the Australian Height Datum (AHD)
as the vertical datum. Mean Sea Level (MSL) is approximately equal to
0m AHD with the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) 
defined as 2.4m AHD for Dampier \cite{antt:06}. 

Data for this study have been sourced from a number of agencies. With
respect to the onshore data, the Defence Imagery and Geospatial
Organisation (DIGO) supplied the Digital Terrain Elevation
Data Level 2 (DTED) which has been authorised for Australian Tsunami
Warning System use only. The resolution of this data is 1 second
(about 30 metres), and has been produced from 1:50 000 contours, elevations and
drainage. In addition, the Department of Land Information (DLI) has provided a
20m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and orthophotography 
covering the NW Shelf. The DTED Level 2 data is ``bare earth'' while the 
DLI data is distorted by vegetation and buildings. Due to data accuracies, we 
use the DLI data everywhere apart from the islands, where the DTED data is used.

With respect to the offshore data, the Department of Planning and
Infrastructure (DPI) have provided state digital fairsheet data around
Dampier. This data covers a very small geographic area. 
The Australian Hydrographic Office (AHO) has supplied extensive
fairsheet data which has also been utilised. In contrast to the onshore data, 
the offshore data is a series of survey points which is typically 
not supplied on a fixed grid. In addition, offshore data typically 
does not have the coverage of the onshore data, and often the 
offshore data will have gaps where surveys have not been conducted.
The coastline has been generated by using the aerial photography as
the WA DLI data surrounding the coast are error prone. Therefore the WA DLI data has been clipped 
at the derived coastline. 

%Figure \ref{fig:contours_compare} shows the contour lines for
%HAT, MSL and LAT for Dampier using the combined DLI and DTED data.

%\begin{figure}[p]
%\center{(a)}
  %\centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]{../report_figures/dampier_contour.jpg}}

%  \caption{Dampier region showing the -m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 
%and 2.4m AHD (HAT) contour lines using the combined DTED Level 2 data and
%the WA DLI data.}
 %\label{fig:contours_compare}
%\end{figure}


Appendix \ref{sec:metadata} provides more details and the supporting metadata 
for this study, including images of the data extent.
Table \ref{table:data} summarises the available data. 

\begin{table}
\caption{Available data for the North West shelf tsunami inundation studies.}
\label{table:data}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
Data & Specifications \\ \hline 
DIGO DTED Level 2  & Onshore, 1 second $\approx$ 30m \\ \hline 
DLI & Onshore, 20m DEM and orthophotography \\ \hline
DPI & Offshore, fairsheet data around Dampier \\ \hline
AHO & Offshore, fairsheet data for North West Shelf region \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}


\pagebreak

