source: production/onslow_2006/report/introduction.tex @ 3240

Last change on this file since 3240 was 3240, checked in by sexton, 19 years ago

textual updates

File size: 2.4 KB
Line 
1
2This report is being provided to the Fire and Emergency Services Authority
3(FESA) as part of the Collaborative Research Agreement (CRA)
4with Geoscience Australia (GA).
5FESA recognises the potential vulnerability of the Western Australia
6coastline to tsunamigenic earthquakes originating from
7the Sunda Arc subduction zone that caused the December 2004 event which
8fortunately had no impact on Australia.
9However, there is historic evidence of tsunami events affecting the
10Western Australia coastline, \cite{CB:ausgeo},
11and FESA has sought to assess
12the relative risk of its urban and regional communities to the tsunami
13threat and develop detailed response plans for a range of plausible events.
14
15This report is the first in a series of studies which
16go towards building the suite of tsunami assessments for the North West
17Shelf.
18Subsequent reports will not only
19describe studies for other localities, they will also revisit these
20scenarios as more refined hazard models with associated return rates
21become available. In this report,
22the methods, assumptions and impacts of a
23single tsunami source scenario is described for the Onslow area in the
24North West shelf region.
25Onslow has a population of around 800
26is part of the Shire of Ashburton in the Pilbara region of
27Western Autralia\footnote{http://www.pdc.wa.gov.au/region/political.htm}.
28Onslow supports
29a variety of industries, including oil, gas, mining, cattle,
30fishing and tourism.
31
32The report will outline the methods of modelling the tsunami from its
33source to its impact ashore and present the predicted consequences.
34The scenario used for this study has an unknown
35return period, however it
36can be classed as a plausible event, see Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}.
37Future studies
38will present a series of scenarios for a range of return periods to
39assist FESA in developing appropriate plans for a range of event impacts.
40The details of the hazard modelling will not be described here, however,
41the modelling technique to simulate the
42impact ashore will be discussed in Section \ref{sec:anuga} with data inputs
43discussed in Section \ref{sec:data}.
44The inundation results will be shown and discussed in Section \ref{sec:results} 
45with the impact modelling outputs shown in Section \ref{sec:impact}.
46The report concludes with a summary of the results detailing issues
47regarding underlying data and further model development.
48
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.