Changeset 3253

Timestamp:

Jun 28, 2006, 7:41:31 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

sexton

Message:

few more changes

Location:

production/onslow_2006/report

Files:

• damage.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• data.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• discussion.tex (modified) (2 diffs)
• onslow_2006_report.tex (modified) (1 diff)
• summary.tex (modified) (1 diff)

production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex

@@ -96 +96 @@
 MSL &43 & 11 & 6 & 20 \\ \hline
 HAT & & & & \\ \hline
-LAT & & & & \\ hline
+LAT & & & & \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}

production/onslow_2006/report/data.tex

@@ -56 +56 @@
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
-
+\end{table}
 
 %\begin{figure}[hbt]

production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex

@@ -17 +17 @@
 
 Initial simulations for this study used the DIGO DTED Level 2 data
-(see Section \sec:data} due to the fact it is
+(see Section \ref{sec:data}) due to the fact it is
 ``bare earth'', whereas the DLI data is distorted by 
 vegetation and buildings.
 Figure \ref{fig:contours_dted} shows the contour lines for
-HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the DTED data. 
-It is evident from Figure \ref{fig:contours_dted}
-that the extent of the tidal inundation is exaggerated which is due to
+HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the DTED data where it is evident 
+that the extent of the tidal inundation is exaggerated. This is due to
 short comings with the digital elevation model (DEM) created from 
 the DTED data. The DEM has been 
@@ -47 +46 @@
 \begin{figure}[hbt]
 
-  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
-{../report_figures/contours_dli.jpg}}
+%  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm]
+%{../report_figures/contours_dli.jpg}}
 
   \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 

production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex

@@ -116 +116 @@
    \section{Issues}
      \input{discussion}
+\label{sec:issues}
 
      \section{Summary}

production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex

@@ -6 +6 @@
 required to determine the impact to Onslow have also
 been described. 
-As discussed in Section \ref{sec:issues}, there are issues
-with the underlying data set which may have vertical inaccuracies
-of approximately 1-2m. As a result, these results should be considered
-preliminary. 
+As discussed in Section \ref{sec:issues}, it is imperative
+that the best available data is used to increase confidence
+in the inundation maps. It is not yet clear what onshore grid resolution
+is required.
 These scenarios will be revisited once the probabilistic models
 are complete so that a suite of tsunami impact assessments can be made.
-It is therefore imperative that suitably accurate onshore data
-be made available to raise confidence in the impact assessments.
 
 Future activities to support the impact studies on the North West Shelf