Changeset 3268
- Timestamp:
- Jul 3, 2006, 11:50:15 AM (19 years ago)
- Location:
- production/onslow_2006
- Files:
-
- 8 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/onslow_2006/make_report.py
r3267 r3268 213 213 214 214 # Generate latex output for location points 215 s = '\\begin{table} \ label{table:locations} \n'215 s = '\\begin{table} \\begin{center} \n' 216 216 fid.write(s) 217 217 s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %report_title 218 218 fid.write(s) 219 219 s = """ 220 \ \begin{center}220 \label{table:locations} 221 221 \\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 222 222 \\bf{Point Name} & \\bf{Easting} & \\bf{Northing} & \\bf{Elevation}\\\\ \hline -
production/onslow_2006/report/anuga.tex
r3252 r3268 20 20 \begin{itemize} 21 21 \item onshore and offshore elevation data (topographic and bathymetric data, 22 see Section \ref{sec:data}) 23 \item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides) 22 see Section \ref{sec:data}), 23 \item initial conditions, such as initial water levels (e.g. determined by tides), 24 24 \item boundary condition (the tsunami source as described in 25 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}) 26 \item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction 25 Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}), 26 \item computational requirements relating to the mesh construction. 27 27 \end{itemize} 28 28 … … 30 30 extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts 31 31 from the event. The Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest 32 Astronomical Tide (LAT) are defined as 1.5m A HD and -1.5m AHD33 respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}, with Mean Sea Level approximately 34 equal to 0m Australian Height Datum. These values are tidal32 Astronomical Tide (LAT) are defined as 1.5m Australian Height Datum (AHD) 33 and -1.5m AHD respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}, with 34 Mean Sea Level approximately equal to 0m AHD. These values are tidal 35 35 predictions based on continous tidal observations from Standard Ports 36 36 over a period of -
production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex
r3241 r3268 63 63 The resultant computational mesh is shown in Figure \ref{fig:mesh_onslow}. 64 64 65 With these cell areas, the study area consists of 4 40150triangles65 With these cell areas, the study area consists of 401939 triangles 66 66 in which water levels and momentums are tracked through time. 67 67 The associated lateral accuracy -
production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex
r3253 r3268 74 74 75 75 \begin{table}[h] 76 \begin{center} 77 \caption{Residential damage sustained for the MSL, HAT and LAT scenarios.} 76 78 \label{table:damageoutput} 77 \caption{Residential damage sustained for the MSL, HAT and LAT scenarios.}78 \begin{center}79 79 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline 80 80 &Houses & Houses & Structural & Repair Cost \% & Contents & Contents Loss \% \\ … … 89 89 90 90 \begin{table}[h] 91 \begin{center} 92 \caption{Injuries sustained for the MSL, HAT and LAT scenarios.} 91 93 \label{table:injuries} 92 \caption{Injuries sustained for the MSL, HAT and LAT scenarios.}93 \begin{center}94 94 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline 95 95 &Minor & Moderate & Serious & Fatal \\ \hline -
production/onslow_2006/report/damage_inputs.tex
r3237 r3268 1 1 \begin{table} 2 \ label{table:collapse}2 \begin{center} 3 3 \caption{Framed residential building collapse probability. $h$ is the 4 4 inundation height (m) above ground where the ground floor height of 0.3m is 5 5 assumed.} 6 \ begin{center}6 \label{table:collapse} 7 7 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline 8 8 Building Location & … … 19 19 20 20 \begin{table} 21 \begin{center} 22 \caption{Mortality and injury state probability} 21 23 \label{table:casualty} 22 \caption{Mortality and injury state probability}23 \begin{center}24 24 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline 25 25 Hazard Exposure & & Unharmed &Minor … … 37 37 38 38 \begin{table} 39 \begin{center} 40 \caption{Injury level classifications} 39 41 \label{table:injury} 40 \caption{Injury level classifications}41 \begin{center}42 42 \begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{|l|p{.695\textwidth}|}\hline 43 43 Injury Severity Level &Injury Description \\ \hline -
production/onslow_2006/report/data.tex
r3267 r3268 21 21 covering the NW Shelf. The DTED Level 2 data is ``bare earth'' with 22 22 the DLI data is distored by vegetation and buildings. The WA DLI data 23 is used for the simulation results which follow, due to the24 increased accuracy o f the DLIdata. Further discussion on the comparison23 is used for the simulation results which follow, due to its overall 24 increased accuracy over the DTED data. Further discussion on the comparison 25 25 between these data sets is deferred to Section \ref{sec:issues}. 26 26 %However, the 30m … … 39 39 The coastline has been generated by 40 40 using the aerial photography and two detailed surveys provided 41 by WA D epartment of Planning and Infrastructure as the WA DLI data42 along the coast is error prone. {\bf confirm}41 by WA DPI. The WA DLI data surrounding the coast is error prone and 42 has been clipped at the derived coastline. {\bf confirm} 43 43 Appendix \ref{sec:metadata} provides more details and metadata for data 44 44 used for this study. -
production/onslow_2006/report/execsum.tex
r3242 r3268 20 20 decision support tools consist of inundation 21 21 maps overlaid on aerial photography of the region 22 detailing critical infrastructure as as damage modelling estimates.22 detailing critical infrastructure as well as damage modelling estimates. 23 23 24 24 This report describes the modelling methodology and the results -
production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex
r3267 r3268 19 19 20 20 \begin{table} 21 \begin{center} 22 \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.} 21 23 \label{table:speedexamples} 22 \caption{Examples of a range of velocities.}23 \begin{center}24 24 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline 25 25 {\bf Velocity (m/s)} & {\bf Example} \\ \hline
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.