Changeset 3330 for production/onslow_2006
- Timestamp:
- Jul 13, 2006, 3:34:29 PM (18 years ago)
- Location:
- production/onslow_2006
- Files:
-
- 5 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/onslow_2006/make_report.py
r3326 r3330 215 215 s = '\\begin{table} \\begin{center} \n' 216 216 fid.write(s) 217 s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario 217 s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario_name 218 218 fid.write(s) 219 219 s = """ -
production/onslow_2006/report/damage.tex
r3323 r3330 94 94 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline 95 95 &Minor & Moderate & Serious & Fatal \\ \hline 96 MSL & 43 & 11 & 6 & 20\\ \hline96 MSL & & & & \\ \hline 97 97 HAT & & & & \\ \hline 98 98 LAT & & & & \\ \hline -
production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex
r3329 r3330 37 37 ashore when each data set is used to demonstrate the importance of using the 38 38 best possible data set. The maximum inundation map is shown fo MSL in 39 Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map_DTED} which can be compared with teh equivalent map for 40 the WA DLI data, Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map}. Additionally, we show the time 41 history of the water's stage and velocity for the point locations in 42 Table \ref{table:locations} for both the DTED and DLI data at MSL. These 43 results are shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseriescompare}. 39 Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map_DTED} which can be compared with the equivalent map for 40 the WA DLI data, Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map}. Given that the 1.5m contour 41 line is further from the coast for the DTED data than the DLI data, we 42 expect to see the inundation to reach further and thus be greater than 43 that seen in Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map}. This is confirmed by 44 Figure \ref{fig:MSL_map_DTED}. These results point to the need for the best 45 available data so that more accurate predictions regarding the 46 inundation can be made. 44 47 45 48 \pagebreak … … 76 79 \label{fig:MSL_map_DTED} 77 80 \end{figure} 81 82 Additionally, we show the time 83 history of the water's stage and velocity for the point locations in 84 Table \ref{table:locations} for both the DTED and DLI data at MSL. These 85 results are shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseriescompare}. 86 87 88 -
production/onslow_2006/report/interpretation.tex
r3323 r3330 47 47 after the drawdown ranges from approximately 2m in the 48 48 west of Beadon Bay (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBaywest}) 49 to 1.5m in the east of Beadon Bay50 (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadon Bayeast}).49 to over 3m in the mouth of Beadon Creek 50 (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonCreekmouth}). 51 51 The speed 52 52 sharply increases at drawdown with further increases as the 53 53 wave grows in amplitude. 54 There is an increased amplitude of approximately 3m found in54 There is an increased amplitude of approximately 4m found in 55 55 east of Beadon Bay for the secondary wave, as opposed to the first wave. 56 This feature is also evident at the West of Groyne location. 56 This feature is also evident at the West of Groyne location but 57 with decreased amplitude. 57 58 This may be due to the geography of the bay, including the groyne west of 58 59 the creek mouth opening, the local bathymetry … … 60 61 61 62 The maximum speed found for the offshore locations occur at the West of 62 Groyne location (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeWestofGroyne}) 63 with speeds halved at the Beadon Bay west location. 64 The speed at west of Beadon Bay is greater than the east of Beadon 65 Bay location (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeast}). 66 There is similar differences in amplitude (from drawdown to maximum 67 amplitude), however, the western location is in deeper water than the eastern 68 location which may indicate the increased speed found in the east of the 69 bay. Subsequent drawdowns are seen as the multitude of waves which make up the 63 Groyne location (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeWestofGroyne}). 64 The speeds at west and east of Beadon Bay are quite similar 65 (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBayeast} and Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonBaywest}). 66 however, there are increased amplitudes (from drawdown to maximum 67 amplitude), in the eastern location which is in shallower water than the western 68 location. 69 Subsequent drawdowns are seen as the multitude of waves which make up the 70 70 event (see Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution}) propagate towards the shore. 71 71 … … 76 76 77 77 It is evident that the sand dunes west of 78 Onslow are very effective in halting the tsunami wave which rise to approximately 79 10m in height, 78 Onslow are very effective in halting the tsunami wave, 80 79 see Figure \ref{fig:MSL_max_inundation}. 81 %There is inundation between the sand dunes at high 82 %tide, Figure \ref{fig:HAT_max_inundation}, however, this water 83 %penetrated from the north east (via 84 %Onslow town centre) rather than seaward. 85 The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow which 86 rise to 15m in height. Currently, we do not model changes 80 There is inundation between the western sand dunes at high 81 tide, Figure \ref{fig:HAT_max_inundation}, however, this water 82 penetrated from the north east (via 83 Onslow town centre) rather than seaward. (The DEM indicates that 84 this area is under 1.5m which is automatically deemed to inundated 85 at HAT.) 86 The same feature is evident for the sand dunes east of Onslow. 87 Currently, we do not model changes 87 88 to the bathymetry or topography due to effects of the water flow. 88 89 Therefore, we do not know whether these sand dunes would withstand the 89 90 transmitted energy of the tsunami wave. 90 The tsunami wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with wave height91 approximately2m at the mouth91 The tsunami wave penetrates the river east of Onslow with a wave height 92 over 2m at the mouth 92 93 (Figure \ref{fig:gaugeBeadonCreekmouth}) 93 94 and inundation -
production/onslow_2006/report/summary.tex
r3300 r3330 18 18 19 19 \begin{itemize} 20 \item Sourcing of data sets 20 \item Sourcing of data sets, 21 21 \item Investigation of solution sensitivity to cell resolution, 22 bathymetry and tsunami source uncertainties 23 \item Location of boundary for simulation study area 24 \item Investigation of friction coefficients 22 bathymetry and tsunami source uncertainties, 23 \item Location of boundary for simulation study area, and 24 \item Investigation of friction coefficients. 25 25 \end{itemize} 26 26
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.