Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 8, 2007, 5:59:47 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

(1) updates to Dampier script based on Perth script (2) minor updates to Onslow report

Location:
anuga_work/production/onslow_2006
Files:
19 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • anuga_work/production/onslow_2006/make_report.py

    r4145 r4147  
    229229s = '\\begin{table} \\begin{center} \n'
    230230fid.write(s)
    231 s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario_name
     231s = '\caption{Defined point locations for %s study area.}' %scenario_name.title()
    232232fid.write(s)
    233233s = """

  • anuga_work/production/onslow_2006/report/modelling_methodology.tex

    r4145 r4147  
    7979for a range of probabilities (or return periods). As Figure \ref{fig:probonslow}
    8080shows, for a given probability, a number of events are possible. The resulting
    81 impact to Onslow would then vary depending on the source of the event.  Further detail
    82 on the tsunami scenarios are outlined in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}.
     81impact to Onslow would then vary depending on the source of the event.  The
     82tsunami scenarios selected for the tsunami risk assessment
     83are discussed in Section \ref{sec:tsunamiscenario}.
    8384
    8485% used for the 2005 report when looking at one event

  • anuga_work/production/onslow_2006/report/onslow_2006_report.tex

    r4145 r4147  
    8787 
    8888\begin{table} \begin{center}
    89 \caption{Defined point locations for onslow study area.}
     89\caption{Defined point locations for Onslow study area.}
    9090\label{table:locations}
    9191\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
    … …  
    158158 
    159159
     160
    160161   \section{Damage modelling inputs}
    161162     \label{sec:damageinputs}

  • anuga_work/production/onslow_2006/report/timeseriesdiscussion.tex

    r4134 r4147  
    77case of MSL, this water level will be 0. As the tsunami wave moves
    88through this point, the water height may grow and thus the stage will
    9 represent the amplitude of the wave. For an onshore location such as the
    10 Light Tower, the actual water depth will be the difference between
    11 the stage and the elevation at that point. Therefore, at the beginning
    12 of the simulation, there will be no water onshore and therefore
    13 the stage and the elevation will be identical.}. Both stage and speed
     9represent the amplitude of the wave.} For an onshore location such as the
     10Light Tower, the actual water depth will be shown rather than the stage.
     11Both stage and speed
    1412(in metres/second) for
    1513each scenario (HAT, MSL and LAT) are shown
    … …  
    6260the actual amplitude is the difference between the stage value
    6361and the initial water level; 2.3 - 1.5}.
    64 The drawdown of around 4.3 m (i.e. 2.3 - -2) then occurs at around 230 mins
     62The drawdown of 4.05 m (i.e. 2.3 - -1.75) then occurs at around 230 mins
    6563(i.e. 3.8 hours after the event has been generated), before
    6664the second wave arrives

  • anuga_work/production/onslow_2006/report/tsunami_scenario.tex

    r3402 r4147  
    1 The tsunamigenic event used in this report was developed for a
    2 preliminary tsunami hazard assessment study delivered by GA
    3 to FESA in September 2005
    4 \cite{BC:FESA}. In the assessment, a suite of Mw 9 earthquakes
    5 were evenly spaced along the Sunda Arc subduction zone and there
    6 was no consideration of the likelihood of each event.
    7 Other less likely sources were not considered, such
    8 as intra-plate earthquakes near the WA coast, volcanoes, landslides
    9 or asteroids.
    10 In the preliminary assessment,
    11 the maximum magnitude of earthquakes off Java was considered to be
    12 at least 8.5 and could potentially be as high as 9.
     1% for original scenario
     2%The tsunamigenic event used in this report was developed for a
     3%preliminary tsunami hazard assessment study delivered by GA
     4%to FESA in September 2005
     5%\cite{BC:FESA}. In the assessment, a suite of Mw 9 earthquakes
     6%were evenly spaced along the Sunda Arc subduction zone and there
     7%was no consideration of the likelihood of each event.
     8%Other less likely sources were not considered, such
     9%as intra-plate earthquakes near the WA coast, volcanoes, landslides
     10%or asteroids.
     11%In the preliminary assessment,
     12%the maximum magnitude of earthquakes off Java was considered to be
     13%at least 8.5 and could potentially be as high as 9.
    1314
    14 FESA is interested in the ``most frequent worst case scenario''. Whilst
    15 we currently cannot determine exactly what that event may be, the Mw 9 event
    16 provides a plausible worst case scenario. To understand the
    17 frequency of these tsunami-genic events,
    18 GA is building probabilistic
    19 models to develop a more complete tsunami hazard assessment
    20 for the Sunda Arc subduction zone,
    21 due for completion in late 2006. In the preliminary assessment for
    22 example, it was suggested that while Mw 7 and 8 earthquakes are expected
    23 to occur with a greater frequency than Mw 9 events,
    24 they are likely to pose a comparatively low and more localised hazard to WA.
     15%FESA is interested in the ``most frequent worst case scenario''. Whilst
     16%we currently cannot determine exactly what that event may be, the Mw 9 event
     17%provides a plausible worst case scenario. To understand the
     18%frequency of these tsunami-genic events,
     19%GA is building probabilistic
     20%models to develop a more complete tsunami hazard assessment
     21%for the Sunda Arc subduction zone,
     22%due for completion in late 2006. In the preliminary assessment for
     23%example, it was suggested that while Mw 7 and 8 earthquakes are expected
     24%to occur with a greater frequency than Mw 9 events,
     25%they are likely to pose a comparatively low and more localised hazard to WA.
    2526
    26 Figure \ref{fig:mw9} shows the maximum wave height of a tsunami initiated
    27 by a Mw 9 event off
    28 the coast of Java. This event provides the source and
    29 boundary condition to the
    30 inundation model presented in Section \ref{sec:anuga}.
     27%Figure \ref{fig:mw9} shows the maximum wave height of a tsunami initiated
     28%by a Mw 9 event off
     29%the coast of Java. This event provides the source and
     30%boundary condition to the
     31%inundation model presented in Section \ref{sec:anuga}.
    3132
    3233
    33 \begin{figure}[hbt]
     34%\begin{figure}[hbt]
    3435
    35   \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=140mm, height=100mm]
    36 {../report_figures/mw9.jpg}}
     36%  \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=140mm, height=100mm]
     37%{../report_figures/mw9.jpg}}
    3738
    38   \caption{Maximum wave height (in cms) for a Mw 9 event off the
    39 coast of Java}
    40   \label{fig:mw9}
    41 \end{figure}
     39%  \caption{Maximum wave height (in cms) for a Mw 9 event off the
     40%coast of Java}
     41%  \label{fig:mw9}
     42%\end{figure}
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.