Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 26, 2006, 10:15:11 PM (19 years ago)
Author:
sexton
Message:

textual updates

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • production/onslow_2006/report/computational_setup.tex

    r3235 r3240  
    1414
    1515{\bf Need some words here about why pick 100m.}
    16 
     16Preliminary investigations indicate that MOST and ANUGA compare
     17well at the 100m contour line.
    1718
    1819\begin{figure}[hbt]
     
    7576              {../report_figures/mesh.jpg}}
    7677
    77   \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area.}
     78  \caption{Computational mesh for Onslow study area where the
     79cell areas increase in resolution; 500 m$^2$, 2500 m$^2$, 20000
     80m$^2$ and 100000 m$^2$.}
    7881  \label{fig:mesh_onslow}
    7982\end{figure}
     
    8487as described in Section \ref{sec:methodology}.
    8588MOST was used to initiate the event and propagate the wave in deep water.
    86 ANUGA uses MOST's output in form of the waves amplitude and velocity at
     89ANUGA uses the MOST wave amplitude and velocity at
    8790the boundary (the 100m contour line as shown in Figure \ref{fig:onslow_area})
    8891and continues to propagate the wave in shallow water and onshore.
     
    9194Figure \ref{fig:MOSTsolution} as a surface showing the wave's
    9295amplitude as a function of its spatial location and time.
    93 
     96This figure shows how the wave has been affected by the bathymetry in
     97arriving at these locations as the amplitude is variable. It is also
     98important to note that the tsunami is made up of a series of
     99waves with different amplitudes.
    94100
    95101\begin{figure}[hbt]
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.