Changeset 3252 for production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex
- Timestamp:
- Jun 28, 2006, 6:39:06 PM (18 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
production/onslow_2006/report/discussion.tex
r3240 r3252 1 %As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the 2 %extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts 3 %from the event. The Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest 4 %Astronomical Tide (LAT) are defined as 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD 5 %respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}. These values are tidal 6 %predictions based on continous tidal observations from Standard Ports 7 %over a period of 8 %at least one year, with the Australian Hydrographic Service 9 %recommending this be extended to three years to capture 10 %changes to the mean sea level. Onslow is listed as 11 %a Standard Port. 1 12 2 As part of the CRA, it was decided to provide results for the 3 extremes of the tidal regimes to understand the potential range of impacts 4 from the event. The Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) and Lowest 5 Astronomical Tide (LAT) are defined as 1.5m AHD and -1.5m AHD 6 respectively for Onslow, \cite{antt:06}. These values are tidal 7 predictions based on continous tidal observations from Standard Ports 8 over a period of 9 at least one year, with the Australian Hydrographic Service 10 recommending this be extended to three years to capture 11 changes to the mean sea level. Onslow is listed as 12 a Standard Port. 13 %As an aside, current work at GA is 14 %extracting information from LANDSAT imagery to reconstruct the 15 %tidal variations for various WA locations. Future modelling of 16 %these areas will incorporate this information. 13 17 14 Figure \ref{fig:contours} shows the contour lines for 15 HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow. 16 It is evident from this figure that the extent of the tidal 17 inundation is exaggerated which is due to 18 short comings with the digital elevation model (DEM). The DEM has been 18 Initial simulations for this study used the DIGO DTED Level 2 data 19 (see Section \sec:data} due to the fact it is 20 ``bare earth'', whereas the DLI data is distorted by 21 vegetation and buildings. 22 Figure \ref{fig:contours_dted} shows the contour lines for 23 HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the DTED data. 24 It is evident from Figure \ref{fig:contours_dted} 25 that the extent of the tidal inundation is exaggerated which is due to 26 short comings with the digital elevation model (DEM) created from 27 the DTED data. The DEM has been 19 28 derived from 20m contour lines. {\bf Need some words from hamish here.} 20 21 As an aside, current work at GA is 22 extracting information from LANDSAT imagery to reconstruct the 23 tidal variations for various WA locations. Future modelling of 24 these areas will incorporate this information. 29 As a result, we turned to the WA DLI onshore data to present 30 the results in this report. Figure \ref{fig:contours_dli} shows 31 the contour lines for HAT, MSL and LAT for Onslow using the WA DLI data. 32 It is obvious that there are significant differences in each DEM with 33 secondary information regarding total station surveys and the knowledge 34 of the HAT contour line pointing to increased confidence in the WA DLI 35 data over the DTED data for use in inundation modelling. 25 36 26 37 \begin{figure}[hbt] 27 38 28 39 \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm] 29 {../report_figures/contours .jpg}}40 {../report_figures/contours_dted.jpg}} 30 41 31 \caption{Onslow regions showing the 1.5m AHD, 0m AHD and -1.5m AHD contour lines.} 32 \label{fig:contours} 42 \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 43 and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines.} 44 \label{fig:contours_dted} 33 45 \end{figure} 46 47 \begin{figure}[hbt] 48 49 \centerline{ \includegraphics[width=150mm, height=100mm] 50 {../report_figures/contours_dli.jpg}} 51 52 \caption{Onslow region showing the -1.5m AHD (LAT), 0m AHD (MSL) 53 and -1.5m AHD (LAT) contour lines.} 54 \label{fig:contours_dli} 55 \end{figure} 56 57 The purpose of this section then is to 58 show the differences to the impact ashore when each data set is used 59 to demonstrate the importance of using the best possible data set. As 60 before, we show the time history of the water's stage and velocity for the 61 point locations in Table \ref{table:locations} for the DTED data. 62 These results are shown in Section \ref{sec:timeseriesdted}. 63
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.