- Timestamp:
- Dec 19, 2006, 3:46:28 PM (18 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
anuga_work/production/sydney_2006/report/interpretation.tex
r4093 r4096 16 16 \caption{Parameters used in ANUGA for the the submarine mass failure scenarios.} 17 17 \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline 18 Parameter & Bulli & Shovel & Yacaaba\\ \hline19 Length & 16840 m & 13500m & 7050m \\ \hline20 Width & 8860 m & 4350m & 3080m \\ \hline21 Thickness & 424 m & 165m & 144m \\ \hline18 {\bf Parameter} & {\bf Bulli} & {\bf Shovel} & {\bf Yacaaba }\\ \hline 19 Length & 16840 m & 13500 m & 7050 m \\ \hline 20 Width & 8860 m & 4350 m & 3080 m \\ \hline 21 Thickness & 424 m & 165 m & 144 m \\ \hline 22 22 Density & 1.46 & 1.49 & 1.48 \\ \hline 23 Water depth to centre of mass & 2087 m & 968m & 1119m \\ \hline23 Water depth to centre of mass & 2087 m & 968 m & 1119 m \\ \hline 24 24 Bathymetric slope & 4 \degree & 4 \degree & 3 \degree \\ \hline 25 25 Angular orientation & 126 \degree & 118 \degree & 133 \degree \\ \hline … … 28 28 \end{center} 29 29 \end{table} 30 31 The modelling has considered three separate regions based on the location 32 of the potential slide failures. The regions A, B and C refer 33 to Wollongong, Sydney and Newcastle. See Appendix \ref{sec:anugasetup} 34 for the extent of each region. 30 35 31 36 Figures \ref{fig:bulliA}, \ref{fig:bulliB} and \ref{fig:bulliC} … … 46 51 slides are considered to occur in different depths of water, the 47 52 resultant amplitude are approximately equal. 53 54 \begin{figure} 55 \centerline{\includegraphics{../report_figures/depth_vs_amp_dataslide.jpg}} 56 \caption{Relationship between characteristic 3D amplitude and depth 57 for each slide volume.} 58 \label{fig:depthvsamp} 59 \end{figure}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.